Don't go getting your knickers in a knot - just read the entire quote and you'll get the entire meaning (you can do that right?). Where did this array of species spring whole and in entirety from? The fertile imagination of a deity along with a bit of magical mud and some potter's skill and a spare rib? How DO you explain it within the constraints of science?
Again, I don't think you understand what you are typing. Do you or do you not want to talk about origins?
Nope. I'll type S-L-O-W-L-Y for you. Origin of species. Three simple words that even you should be able to make out.
You claim that all species came from one cell, I claim that all species exist in a similar form to what they are today as they continue to adapt and change as observed today.
I'm trying to make sense of your claim. Where did they come from?
I know, it is hard for you to make sense out of things that are right in front of you since you are to busy living in a world of fairy tales.
Up to this point, I've provided evidence. You have not.
Same evidence as yours, just minues the missing links and hoaxes.
Back up and re-read. I'm being specific enough for even a paramecium to understand and I'm assuming you're at least a couple of cognitive levels above that unicellular creation.
Here is your quote:
"Your theory seems to be something along the line of ZAP! - flip the switch and there they are. Deus ex Machina - a bored deity, and empty universe. What evidence supports that theory? You seem to be dodging that pesky detail. "
What part of the word origin do you not understand?
Dreams and visions...that's pretty cool....but, I was hoping for something a bit more concrete?
Coming right up...
And there you go, you made my point - that's evolution.
You don't really understand what you believe do you?
Let me see if I can dumb it down even more. Being "exposed" to something doesn't mean something will "adapt" to it.

You're gettin there. Keep up the good work. Climbing the mountain of truth takes awhile though so don't give up.
There has to be a need and a niche to fill.
Wow
Long ago and far away....
...a fairy tale is coming next...
broke off and committed to a land-running, plains dwelling social hunter
Wow
- a meat-eating development that gave us the energy to devote to building better brains and intricate hands instead of better guts -
Wow
a development which has served us well and isn't conducive to flight.
So if you eat meat you can't fly...errrr....um... no... couldn't be that... birds eat meat.... think harder....
I've got it...
If you are smart you can't fly.

The guy at 1:07 must have had to big of a brain.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEdtvct6Tf0"]YouTube - Man's Early Quest to Fly[/ame]
Desire isn't need and need is determined by environmental conditions and the opening of new niches to exploit - like the high altitude tibetans.
So what need is there to fly?
I answered that. Several times.
If you consider "Again, who created the creator? " an answer, then we have bigger problems than what I orignally thought.
Again, how did the giraffe evolve?
Now, how about you answer a question: who created the creator? Or...can you? Shall I be prepared for yet another dodge?
Again, do you want to talk about origins or not?