Creating a God is not an easy task, but since the world has about 4,200 religions, it's been done many, many times. The problem is creating a good one, a popular one, one that seems to give members something to believe in. You got to do your research, learn all you can about the other religions that are already out there. Use the good parts of the old ones ( religious syncretism ) and make it work for you. The narrative you create how to be believable, adding supernatural touches is fine because it's expected. Then you have to put the safeguards in, breaking membership ( exclusivity system )comes with penalties authorized by the god himself, of course it's usually always a guy. All this in the name of God. Please add to the conversation. Thanks, Stan.
It was Durkheim who wrote that it's not G0d who made man in his image, but Man who made God in their image.
I say that man seeks a reality that is tangible and creates G0d in his image and gives him a form which is why we are told not to make anthropomorphic depictions of an Essence being described as the most finite source of creation.
What good is discussing man's making of a God in their tangible image, if people can't properly discern and define God (that power & source of life)?
With no finite definition, their concept of right or wrong is based on affiliation into an error or can be evil without knowing it's evil, just as Radicals don't think they are doing evil.
Without comprehension to your positioning (path) then like being blindfolded in a gyro, you can point up assuming it's the sky, however if you don't know you're facing down (positioned opposite) you would be pointing to the ground. Therefore you need a mediator that defines that Essence power of life, so you can "reflect and manifest" that Essence.
Certain sects of certain faiths accidentally combine a claimed, but imposter mediator, with their god, neither which leads you or they to the proper path or understanding, because "you & they receive from the wrong message & false messengers."
Which is why humanity has failed and why we suffer fallen off our purpose and course, still not complete nor whole far from the kingdom of Shalem, and thus outside the walls of the kingdom & into Gehinom (trash heap of life).
In Judaism you have those who bestow and those n opposite nature, always taking instead of giving, we call this "receiving" nature.
We try to sway society into the bestowing nature over the receiving nature.
The serving of an Icon has not changed our lopsided nature. Moshiach is a servant to humanity not served by it. Thus called top messenger/reflection(arch-malakh) and mediator(meditron). "You are programed to receive the message", but it's up to you to discern which side does that message come from. Is it towards Shalem (stability, completion, and wholeness) or lead you away or in opposition to Shalem?