CPAC crowd cheers for impeachment hearings.

I would have been one of those applauding.

Because I would have been among those who remember how much Trump's popularity increased, the last time the fucktardz tried to impeach him.
So let's try it again, then.
 
e is Like a continuing forever war.

In reality, 47 is a Convicted Felon, an Adjudicated Rapist. He is a5-Deferment Draft Dodging Coward who called U.S. War Dead, "Suckers and Losers".

He took it upon himself (and Violation of Article I Section VIII of the United States Constitution) decide make war on Iran.

He has had over 20+Women accuse him of Sexual Assault, Sexual Abuse, Sexual Harassment AND Improper Sexual Contact. He is Pedophile. That is the reality and IF the Democrats had run someone that you have red, white and blue bloody murder.
 
Fake news....The real story from Chat GPT:

"CPAC attendees were overwhelmingly against Trump’s impeachment. The cheering you saw was likely a mix of sarcasm, crowd energy, and pro-Trump sentiment—not genuine support for removing him from office"
 
You are so right

He likes a continuing forever war.

0311 In reality, 47 is a Convicted Felon, an Adjudicated Rapist. He is a5-Deferment Draft Dodging Coward who called U.S. War Dead, "Suckers and Losers".

He took it upon himself (and Violation of Article I Section VIII of the United States Constitution) decide make war on Iran.

He has had over 20+Women accuse him of Sexual Assault, Sexual Abuse, Sexual Harassment AND Improper Sexual Contact. He is Pedophile. That is the reality and IF the Democrats had run someone that you have red, white and blue bloody murder.
 
Conservative activist and lobbyist Matthew Schlapp drew an unexpected response Friday while addressing attendees at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Texas.

While speaking from the stage, Schlapp asked the audience how many people would like to see impeachment hearings. The question prompted loud cheers from the crowd, prompting Schlapp to respond it was not the answer he was seeking. He repeated the question a second time, which resulted in a mix of applause and boos.


*********************

It is about time that a few so-called “conservatives” wake up to the clusterf*** that the Trump administration is.

Corrupt, warmongering, inept and disasterous.

Trumpism and the GOP are synonymous now with useless wars and covering up for pedos.

Trumpism is worthless as an ideology.

The mid-terms can’t come fast enough.
CPAC is a gathering of the dumbest people on all of planet Earth so there's a good chance they didn't know what they were cheering for
 
Fake news....The real story from Chat GPT:

"CPAC attendees were overwhelmingly against Trump’s impeachment. The cheering you saw was likely a mix of sarcasm, crowd energy, and pro-Trump sentiment—not genuine support for removing him from office"
Your Goodfacts are not Realfacts.
 
Thats not nurturing! Accurate but not nurturing...
All those cheering idiots would still vote for Trump

owning-the-libs-bro-v0-ek7lpoxqvfrg1.jpeg
 
In reality, 47 is a Convicted Felon, an Adjudicated Rapist. He is a5-Deferment Draft Dodging Coward who called U.S. War Dead, "Suckers and Losers".

He took it upon himself (and Violation of Article I Section VIII of the United States Constitution) decide make war on Iran.

He has had over 20+Women accuse him of Sexual Assault, Sexual Abuse, Sexual Harassment AND Improper Sexual Contact. He is Pedophile. That is the reality and IF the Democrats had run someone that you have shouted red, white and blue bloody murder.
 
So what you want is open civil war in the United Ststes… because that’s what your proposed actions will lead to.
Not hardly. A reminder, humans have a shelf life. Gen Z and Millenials don't have the same prejudices as Boomers.
 
No, you have to prove your goodfacts are indeed that. You can't. Ever.
I already proved my point, I gave you Chat GPT. Instead of denigrating my source and insulting me, why don't you come of with any citation. First though, you need to translate into English what exactly you mean. 'goodfacts?' WTF?
 
15th post
I already proved my point, I gave you Chat GPT. Instead of denigrating my source and insulting me, why don't you come of with any citation. First though, you need to translate into English what exactly you mean. 'goodfacts?' WTF?
No, you did not. Why do you lie?
 
CPAC itself has gone to hell. It's been thoroughly jacked and corrupted by the same types of double-talking jive turkeys that jacked and corrupted the Tea Party Movement as well as MAGA.

We're witnessing another attempt at a rise to power by the same big-government, rabidly statist, big spending neo-cons.

But I think it will be short-lived. Not that the Dems are any better at that level of politics, but at least with them they don't try to hide it and pretend that they're something that they are not.

You live in the wrong country
The wrong century
Or both.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom