Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Are you guys gonna bring it to the Supreme Court? I wish you luck, as I wished you with the voting fraud thing.White Farmers should file for an injunction in federal court. The Supreme Court ruled in 1976 University of California Board of Regents v. Bakke that university admissions standards based solely on race violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It was the first time the Court addressed reverse discrimination. Bakke won as white applicant to medical school. Also it violates white farmer's 14th Amendment right to "equal protection under law."
It has standing and is justiciable. District courts in Iowa or Nebraska are not the cultural communist courts of 9th District.Are you guys gonna bring it to the Supreme Court? I wish you luck, as I wished you with the voting fraud thing.White Farmers should file for an injunction in federal court. The Supreme Court ruled in 1976 University of California Board of Regents v. Bakke that university admissions standards based solely on race violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It was the first time the Court addressed reverse discrimination. Bakke won as white applicant to medical school. Also it violates white farmer's 14th Amendment right to "equal protection under law."
LOL.
Wrong. Maybe you check what happened to black farmers before you run you reacist mouth.White Farmers should file for an injunction in federal court. The Supreme Court ruled in 1976 University of California Board of Regents v. Bakke that university admissions standards based solely on race violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It was the first time the Court addressed reverse discrimination. Bakke won as white applicant to medical school. Also it violates white farmer's 14th Amendment right to "equal protection under law."
Also, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it illegal over 55 years ago...White Farmers should file for an injunction in federal court. The Supreme Court ruled in 1976 University of California Board of Regents v. Bakke that university admissions standards based solely on race violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It was the first time the Court addressed reverse discrimination. Bakke won as white applicant to medical school. Also it violates white farmer's 14th Amendment right to "equal protection under law."
Exactly why white farmer's have legal standing!Also, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it illegal over 55 years ago...White Farmers should file for an injunction in federal court. The Supreme Court ruled in 1976 University of California Board of Regents v. Bakke that university admissions standards based solely on race violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It was the first time the Court addressed reverse discrimination. Bakke won as white applicant to medical school. Also it violates white farmer's 14th Amendment right to "equal protection under law."
Title VI:
"SEC. 601. No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance."
They had a business that failed.Wrong. Maybe you check what happened to black farmers before you run you reacist mouth.White Farmers should file for an injunction in federal court. The Supreme Court ruled in 1976 University of California Board of Regents v. Bakke that university admissions standards based solely on race violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It was the first time the Court addressed reverse discrimination. Bakke won as white applicant to medical school. Also it violates white farmer's 14th Amendment right to "equal protection under law."
Because they are getting compensated at 120% of debt automatically because they are black. Race based program. No white farmer's will see compensation under this program because their agricultural operations are too big to qualify.Your article says 25% of the poor farmers getting relief are black.... Exactly HOW is that discrimination or reverse discrimination as you claim?
District courts refuses to hear cases in technicalities and legal language, not constitutionality of elections and states.Are you guys gonna bring it to the Supreme Court? I wish you luck, as I wished you with the voting fraud thing.White Farmers should file for an injunction in federal court. The Supreme Court ruled in 1976 University of California Board of Regents v. Bakke that university admissions standards based solely on race violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It was the first time the Court addressed reverse discrimination. Bakke won as white applicant to medical school. Also it violates white farmer's 14th Amendment right to "equal protection under law."
LOL.
Yep.Exactly why white farmer's have legal standing!Also, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it illegal over 55 years ago...White Farmers should file for an injunction in federal court. The Supreme Court ruled in 1976 University of California Board of Regents v. Bakke that university admissions standards based solely on race violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It was the first time the Court addressed reverse discrimination. Bakke won as white applicant to medical school. Also it violates white farmer's 14th Amendment right to "equal protection under law."
Title VI:
"SEC. 601. No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance."
It's the Marxist-Democrat path towards "equality."Yep.Exactly why white farmer's have legal standing!Also, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it illegal over 55 years ago...White Farmers should file for an injunction in federal court. The Supreme Court ruled in 1976 University of California Board of Regents v. Bakke that university admissions standards based solely on race violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It was the first time the Court addressed reverse discrimination. Bakke won as white applicant to medical school. Also it violates white farmer's 14th Amendment right to "equal protection under law."
Title VI:
"SEC. 601. No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance."
All over America now, Dems are trying to fix the sins of past racism with a new form of racism that they refer to as "equity."
Dems are actually passing partisan racist bills, and our president just signed one.
There was a White farmer on Fox this morning. He talked about how he used to have a lot of debt, so he worked hard and paid it off. Now this bill would pay off 120% of minority farmers' debt? And the Caucasian farmers who still have debt would be put at significant financial disadvantage. What's up with that?
The way you fix the system is to give equal opportunity for all, regardless of how they were born. When you give unfair advantages to one group, systematically, you break the natural order of things where the best and brightest achieve success with superior products and advances.
It's similar to lowering performance standards for a group of people. That is not generally helpful. Naturally, when you lower standards, you get lesser performance. The converse is also true.
No, they aren't .Yep.Exactly why white farmer's have legal standing!Also, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it illegal over 55 years ago...White Farmers should file for an injunction in federal court. The Supreme Court ruled in 1976 University of California Board of Regents v. Bakke that university admissions standards based solely on race violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It was the first time the Court addressed reverse discrimination. Bakke won as white applicant to medical school. Also it violates white farmer's 14th Amendment right to "equal protection under law."
Title VI:
"SEC. 601. No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance."
All over America now, Dems are trying to fix the sins of past racism with a new form of racism that they refer to as "equity."
Dems are actually passing partisan racist bills, and our president just signed one.
There was a White farmer on Fox this morning. He talked about how he used to have a lot of debt, so he worked hard and paid it off. Now this bill would pay off 120% of minority farmers' debt? And the Caucasian farmers who still have debt would be put at significant financial disadvantage. What's up with that?
The way you fix the system is to give equal opportunity for all, regardless of how they were born. When you give unfair advantages to one group, systematically, you break the natural order of things where the best and brightest achieve success with superior products and advances.
It's similar to lowering performance standards for a group of people. That is not generally helpful. Naturally, when you lower standards, you get lesser performance. The converse is also true.
> Whites like you are delusional. Whites have given themselves unfair advantages since this country started.No, they aren't .Yep.Exactly why white farmer's have legal standing!Also, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it illegal over 55 years ago...White Farmers should file for an injunction in federal court. The Supreme Court ruled in 1976 University of California Board of Regents v. Bakke that university admissions standards based solely on race violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It was the first time the Court addressed reverse discrimination. Bakke won as white applicant to medical school. Also it violates white farmer's 14th Amendment right to "equal protection under law."
Title VI:
"SEC. 601. No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance."
All over America now, Dems are trying to fix the sins of past racism with a new form of racism that they refer to as "equity."
Dems are actually passing partisan racist bills, and our president just signed one.
There was a White farmer on Fox this morning. He talked about how he used to have a lot of debt, so he worked hard and paid it off. Now this bill would pay off 120% of minority farmers' debt? And the Caucasian farmers who still have debt would be put at significant financial disadvantage. What's up with that?
The way you fix the system is to give equal opportunity for all, regardless of how they were born. When you give unfair advantages to one group, systematically, you break the natural order of things where the best and brightest achieve success with superior products and advances.
It's similar to lowering performance standards for a group of people. That is not generally helpful. Naturally, when you lower standards, you get lesser performance. The converse is also true.
Whites like you are delusional. Whites have given themselves unfair advantages since this country started.
www.usmessageboard.com
