Woodznutz
Platinum Member
- Dec 9, 2021
- 17,572
- 8,255
- 473
SNAP and other programs provide the means for millions.Their nutrition would improve even more if they worked to obtain the food.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
SNAP and other programs provide the means for millions.Their nutrition would improve even more if they worked to obtain the food.
That’s silly. Most poor do work.Their nutrition would improve even more if they worked to obtain the food.
More woo woo. Unimpressed.It's rocket science, because you haven't any clue whether position 408 and 410 of the SARS-CoV-2 spike that locks onto fatty acids was deliberately designed in the lab.
Finding a good supermarket isn't rocket science. Of course you can't shoplift the place into bankruptcy as often happens in poor neighborhoods.Wrong, twice.
As a retiree, Badger's SNAP right now stands at $786, enough into Fall, 2022.SNAP and other programs provide the means for millions.
Minimal subsistence. It provides food. Ask anyone who works at shelters or provides foot through Salvation Army et al. It’s subsistence food and no where near what’s needed for better nutritional benefits. Providing a balanced meal on a regular basis is well beyound the means of any charity.SNAP and other programs provide the means for millions.
If you expected a left-wing echo chamber, yes you did.Wow, I can see I made a mistake coming to this site.
That's only because you are uneducated in the science that you criticize, and because of your inherent stupidity, which always gets precisely the reality it deserves.More woo woo. Unimpressed.
Dipshit, for those with an IQ over 80, charity-mafia shelters have not been an option since Feb 2020.Minimal subsistence. It provides food. Ask anyone who works at shelters or provides foot through Salvation Army et al. It’s subsistence food and no where near what’s needed for better nutritional benefits. Providing a balanced meal on a regular basis is well beyound the means of any charity.
Ridiculous. The poor don’t have the transportation nor the means to pay for and store it. Your comments are silly and untrue. The better of every product tends to be more expensive.Finding good food isn't rocket science.
Your comments are uneducated, ignorant and uninformed. Only someone with the mentality of a mature cumber would think the most nutritious foods are available to anyone. It’s no more easily available then the better of any product, including clean air and water. The majority of poor do work.That's only because you are uneducated in the science that you criticize, and because of your inherent stupidity, which always gets precisely the reality it deserves.
I would receive $116 per month, if I were on it. My monthly food costs are about $130, so SNAP would cover most of it.As a retiree, Badger's SNAP right now stands at $786, enough into Fall, 2022.
A simpleton who just mentions the word scientist and thinks they are. Amazing. There is no science on the right for sure. Just BS woo woo.That's only because you are uneducated in the science that you criticize, and because of your inherent stupidity, which always gets precisely the reality it deserves.
SNAP is intended to provide about 70 percent of a family's nutritional needs. The rest is up to them. It's a supplemental program, not a complete program. SNAP recipients also have access to other free food sources.Minimal subsistence. It provides food. Ask anyone who works at shelters or provides foot through Salvation Army et al. It’s subsistence food and no where near what’s needed for better nutritional benefits. Providing a balanced meal on a regular basis is well beyound the means of any charity.
That’s silly. There is more to providing better nutrition then just the cost of the food. Maybe someone else does your shopping for you and preparing your meals.I would receive $116 per month, if I were on it. My monthly food costs are about $130, so SNAP would cover most of it.
The poor are more mobile than you think. They can find their way to a good supermarket. Also the best foods are actually the cheapest. They just need to be prepared, i.e. cooked, baked, peeled, etc.Ridiculous. The poor don’t have the transportation nor the means to pay for and store it. Your comments are silly and untrue. The better of every product tends to be more expensive.
Any restaurant where the more nutritious foids are provided are ALWAYS among the most expensive.
Fast foods are cheaper, easier to get and promote obesity.
Yes there's pantry access, though one must get more technical in deciding what to do about the violence of the American diet that promotes an arrogant medical mafia. The SNAP addict may not know that it's better to buy an apple and learn how to shrink the stomach, even in Northern climates.SNAP is intended to provide about 70 percent of a family's nutritional needs. The rest is up to them. It's a supplemental program, not a complete program. SNAP recipients also have access to other free food sources.
I live alone, do my own shopping, cooking. I study health and know more about it than most.That’s silly. There is more to providing better nutrition then just the cost of the food. Maybe someone else does your shopping for you and preparing your meals.
More silly arguments that completely neglect that healthier organic more nutritious foods need more refrigeration, access and the means to prepare that the poor don’t have. It’s not the food alone it’s the logistics around its consumption. Geesus, the middle class who can easily afford these foods are grossly obese as well. Look at fucking Trump. He’s unhealthy by choice. The poor have little choice.SNAP is intended to provide about 70 percent of a family's nutritional needs. The rest is up to them. It's a supplemental program, not a complete program. SNAP recipients also have access to other free food sources.