Court Filing Exposes Lies and Clinton Campaign Hoax

[Viktor]

Court filing exposes lies and Clinton Campaign Hoax.
Durham Filing Reprises Truth About Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax — It Was a Clinton Campaign Smear Job - The New American

 

[konradv]

Court filing exposes lies and Clinton Campaign Hoax.
Durham Filing Reprises Truth About Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax — It Was a Clinton Campaign Smear Job - The New American

Durham claimed no such thing and people are exaggerating for political points.

How the latest Trump-Russia filing generated buzz

 

[Colin norris]

Court filing exposes lies and Clinton Campaign Hoax.
Durham Filing Reprises Truth About Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax — It Was a Clinton Campaign Smear Job - The New American

No. Heaven forbid. Someone telling lies?
In America? I can't believe it.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Oh Synthaholic...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Durham claimed no such thing and people are exaggerating for political points.

How the latest Trump-Russia filing generated buzz

Let's add to the palpable fear you Democrat supporters evince per the Durham filing:

"The Durham filing then went on:

The defendant’s billing records reflect that the defendant repeatedly billed the Clinton Campaign for his work on the [Alfa Bank] allegations. In compiling and disseminating these allegations, the defendant and Tech Executive-1 also had met and communicated with another law partner at Law Firm-1 who was then serving as General Counsel to the Clinton Campaign (“Campaign Lawyer-1”).

The Words 'Infiltrate' and 'Spy' Appear Exactly Zero Times in John Durham's Recent Court Filing. Here's What It Actually Says — and What It Doesn't.​

The first missive, filed Friday by special counsel John H. Durham, led to claims by conservatives (such as Kash Patel on FOX News) and even by Donald Trump himself that liberal and Democratic figures were "infiltrating" or "spying" on his campaign. The Durham filing, however, does not directly...

lawandcrime.com



Again, from the Durham filing:

The Government’s evidence at trial will also establish that among the Internet data Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited was domain name system (“DNS”) Internet traffic pertaining to (i) a particular healthcare provider, (ii) Trump Tower, (iii) Donald Trump’s Central Park West apartment building, and (iv) the Executive Office of the President of the United States (“EOP”). (Tech Executive-1’s employer, Internet Company-1, had come to access and maintain dedicated servers for the EOP as part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided DNS resolution services to the EOP. Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump.)"
Click to expand...

Ibid

 

[konradv]

Let's add to the palpable fear you Democrat supporters evince per the Durham filing:

"The Durham filing then went on:

The Words 'Infiltrate' and 'Spy' Appear Exactly Zero Times in John Durham's Recent Court Filing. Here's What It Actually Says — and What It Doesn't.​

The first missive, filed Friday by special counsel John H. Durham, led to claims by conservatives (such as Kash Patel on FOX News) and even by Donald Trump himself that liberal and Democratic figures were "infiltrating" or "spying" on his campaign. The Durham filing, however, does not directly...

lawandcrime.com



Again, from the Durham filing:


Ibid

 

[PoliticalChic]

Best rebuttal you are able to make.


But I love watching you Nazis....er, Democrats, sweat.

 

[Ringo]