Indeed, everyone DOES know.. Now go put on some chapstick and get ready to kiss some white ass starting with
No black man needs to kiss the white man's butt, however, are you kissing the butt of your black boss? If not you're a hypocrite.
Like i've said, negro.. The African Americans I work with are respectable enough not to deserve the label ******.
Because they employ the ungrateful white jackass, thats why. Who the hell have you the right to call the blacks you don't like *******/ Would that so called "respectable" blacks at your job approve of this? Do you use the word ****** around these blacks to describe blacks you don't like?
Unlike you they are not hellbent on blaming ****** for every hangnail and shart. This isn't about fear, jig, it's about respect. And just don't respect you. Not one bit.
The Bass is a self made man from a respectable black family and neighborhood that prides itself on being self sufficient, no need to blame whiet for anything except for what he has obviously been guilty of, things which are true and that you don't like to hear.
So, go ahead.. thank the WHITE man who gave the Emancipation Proclamation to your black ass ancestors...
The same white man who said this:
Concerning Emancipation: Fourth Debate
I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, [applause]---that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will for ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything.
Oh and this proves without a doubt that the Civil War as fought by Lincoln was not some white gesture of white benevolence to blacks:
Abraham Lincoln's Letter to Horace Greeley
"Executive Mansion,
Washington, August 22, 1862.
Hon. Horace Greeley:
Dear Sir.
I have just read yours of the 19th. addressed to myself through the New-York Tribune. If there be in it any statements, or assumptions of fact, which I may know to be erroneous, I do not, now and here, controvert them. If there be in it any inferences which I may believe to be falsely drawn, I do not now and here, argue against them. If there be perceptable [sic] in it an impatient and dictatorial tone, I waive it in deference to an old friend, whose heart I have always supposed to be right.
As to the policy I "seem to be pursuing" as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.
I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was." If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.
I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men everywhere could be free.
Yours,
A. Lincoln.
And why did Lincoln issue the proclamation? Well its simple, he did it in the belief that doing so was best to save the Union, not as an act of good will white benevolence for black people, read again jackass:
Abraham Lincoln's Letter to James Conkling
But the proclamation, as law, either is valid, or is not valid. If it is not valid, it needs no retraction. If it is valid, it can not be retracted, any more than the dead can be brought to life. Some of you profess to think its retraction would operate favorably for the Union. Why better after the retraction, than before the issue? There was more than a year and a half of trial to suppress the rebellion before the proclamation issued, the last one hundred days of which passed under an explicit notice that it was coming, unless averted by those in revolt, returning to their allegiance. The war has certainly progressed as favorably for us, since the issue of proclamation as before. I know, as fully as one can know the opinions of others, that some of the commanders of our armies in the field who have given us our most important successes believe the emancipation policy and the use of the colored troops constitute the heaviest blow yet dealt to the Rebellion, and that at least one of these important successes could not have been achieved when it was but for the aid of black soldiers. Among the commanders holding these views are some who have never had any affinity with what is called abolitionism or with the Republican party policies but who held them purely as military opinions. I submit these opinions as being entitled to some weight against the objections often urged that emancipation and arming the blacks are unwise as military measures and were not adopted as such in good faith.
Simple and plain, Lincoln's freeing of the slaves was just a means to and end to win the ar and preserve the Union, so stop spreading the lie that white soldiers in the Civil war shed their blood to free slaves, they shed their blood to preserve the Union. Lincoln was only opposed to slavery spreading in future US territories, but he was not for ending slavery in the territories where it already existed.
In all, you BS white benevolence argument has been refuted and black people don't need to kiss Lincoln's ass. Also your implying that blacks really did nothing in the war is refuted by the same man who's butt you say blacks should kiss, the participation of blacks in the war was important.
