Could they be connected....??

EMH

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2021
Messages
30,210
Reaction score
17,817
Points
2,788
We have this...




was that somehow involved in manufacturing the image we saw of "Cat 5" which was actually a storm from the past superimposed over the actual Cat 1 that hit Jamaica?





Even if it is determined to be the source of the "cane fraud" at NWS, will anyone ever get indicted by Pam Bondi's DOJ?
 
Elaborate? How did you come to that conclusion?



The storm left the vast majority of trees intact, the storm surge was minimal....



The Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale - According to NOAA



When Is Hurricane Season In St Lucia?


  • Visual Search
  • Save
  • View image

  • More
  • Related searches
 
Like I said in your other thread, this argument isn't realistic. You can't eyeball reality and decide measurements are wrong.

Certain categories don't guarantee certain damage. That's not how scale works. There are many variables involved.
 
^^^^^^^^


If you shoot a 357 magnum at someone's head, it doesn't matter that the head was undamaged after, it was still hit by the 357 but it must have bounced off...


If you boil water at 300F, and the water stays liquid, it really was 300F, the water just decided not to boil then....
 
^^^^^^^^


If you shoot a 357 magnum at someone's head, it doesn't matter that the head was undamaged after, it was still hit by the 357 but it must have bounced off...


If you boil water at 300F, and the water stays liquid, it really was 300F, the water just decided not to boil then....
The laws of physics don’t negotiate with expectations. A .357 round has a defined energy; if it hits a head and the head isn’t penetrated, it’s because of the interaction of material strength, impact angle, and energy, just like water at 300F staying liquid is simply under pressure or not nucleating, not choosing to defy thermodynamics.

Objects respond to forces according to measurable properties, not personal intuition. Saying the water ‘decided’ not to boil is scientifically meaningless.
 
Last edited:
The laws of physics don’t negotiate with expectations. A .357 round has a defined energy; if it hits a head and the head isn’t penetrated, it’s because of the interaction of material strength, impact angle, and energy, just like water at 300F staying liquid is simply under pressure or not nucleating, not choosing to defy thermodynamics.

Objects respond to forces according to measurable properties, not personal intuition. Saying the water ‘decided’ not to boil is scientifically meaningless.



When a Cat 5 makes landfall, no trees are left standing. Find one photo of that on Jamaica...
 
When a Cat 5 makes landfall, no trees are left standing. Find one photo of that on Jamaica...
You’re still confusing classification with visual outcome. A Category 5 is defined by measured sustained wind speed and pressure, not by whether the damage looks dramatic enough to you.
 
You’re still confusing classification with visual outcome. A Category 5 is defined by measured sustained wind speed and pressure, not by whether the damage looks dramatic enough to you.



Really... the official report is that Melissa hit Jamaica as a Cat 5.


The damage from the photos shows Cat 1.

You can't show us anything close to Cat 5 damage, because there wasn't any.


If there isn't Cat 5 damage, it wasn't a Cat 5.


If your dog leaves a footprint in the backyard, and the "climate scientists" claim it was a grizzly bear, that doesn't prove it was a grizzly bear.... which is what your "logic" is here... LOL!!
 
Really... the official report is that Melissa hit Jamaica as a Cat 5.


The damage from the photos shows Cat 1.

You can't show us anything close to Cat 5 damage, because there wasn't any.


If there isn't Cat 5 damage, it wasn't a Cat 5.


If your dog leaves a footprint in the backyard, and the "climate scientists" claim it was a grizzly bear, that doesn't prove it was a grizzly bear.... which is what your "logic" is here... LOL!!
That’s exactly the problem with your logic. You’re treating measured intensity like a subjective look test. A Category 5 isn’t defined by how much damage people see.

Damage is highly variable. It depends on population density, building codes, terrain, storm size, and where the eyewall actually hits. Jamaica’s mountains alone can shred peak winds before they reach towns. You can have a genuine Cat 5 core produce far less visible destruction than a slower, sprawling Cat 3 over a city.
 
Back
Top Bottom