Bullshit!
Could The Trump Landslide Be America Living "they know not what they do,"????
- Thread starter PoliticalChic
- Start date
Mac1958
Diamond Member
That's the kind of thing they believe. If the numbers are mediocre, they just make up new numbers.
Just like their orange Christ, who makes them think they're "winning".
We're in a zombie movie.
Communists did not replace democratic socialism. They replaced right wing dictatorships.
Mac1958
Diamond Member
His margin of victory was low by historical standards.
His percentage of Electoral Votes won was low by historical standards.
So the flock, as always, has to create its own definitions of words. That's one of the signs of a cult.
Oddball
Unobtanium Member
- Thread starter
- #167
The winner in the category of unintentional humor!
You must have been looking in the mirror when you said that.
Just remarking that ‘scum’ is not a term commonly used by an American presidentp about the citizens. What if Obama had called the Tea Party scum?
Silly little boy!
The Duke
Diamond Member
- Jul 30, 2022
- 43,107
- 56,017
- 3,488
Real Socialists don't need no steenkin' Democracy.
- Thread starter
- #171
"When President Obama called Mitt Romney a "bullshitter" in the pages of Rolling Stone earlier this year,..."
Did you post about that?
You didn't....here's why:
1 There are those of us who have been brought up correctly, with the right principles and knowledge of right and wrong
2. Some of us may not have had that start, and been misled by sophistry, but finally saw through it and moved in the right direction.
3. I see that you belong to neither of those categories. But you are not alone: Around 22% of Americans identify as strong Democrats, meaning they are highly likely to consistently vote for Democratic candidates, no matter how many lies and hoaxes are revealed.
- Thread starter
- #172
His margin of victory was low by historical standards.
His percentage of Electoral Votes won was low by historical standards.
So the flock, as always, has to create its own definitions of words. That's one of the signs of a cult.
Would you have rather had his margins than Kamala's?
- Thread starter
- #173
Oddball
Unobtanium Member
GFY, Marxist ******.
Attachments
Oddball
Unobtanium Member
Bubba never got 50% in two elections, dipschitt.
Communism proves that a dictatorship is inappropriate government for a commend economy. It does not prove that democratic socialism cannot work. Under capitalism the rich have advantages in campaign financing and control of the mass media.
- Thread starter
- #178
- Thread starter
- #179
As the rich supported the Fascist Democrats, why did Trump win in a landslide?
The Democrat Party is the party of the rich.
“Democratic Party Won't Admit It's Become the Party of Wealth Democratic Party Won't Admit It's Become the Party of Wealth
Democrats Are the Party of Corporate Oligarchs
The average American is being crushed by leftist Big Government and Big Business.
Democrats Are the Party of Corporate Oligarchs
The average American is being crushed by leftist Big Government and Big Business.patriotpost.us
“The two parties are switching class constituents. Some 65% of the Americans making more than $500,000 a year are Democrats, and 74% of those who earn less than $100,000 a year are Republicans, according to IRS statistics. Gone are the days of working people automatically voting Democratic, or Republicans being caricatured as a party of stockbrokers on golf courses.
By 2018, Democratic representatives were in control of all 20 of the wealthiest congressional districts. In the recent presidential primaries and general election, 17 of the 20 wealthiest ZIP codes gave more money to Democratic candidates than to Republicans.” Democrats Are Now the Party of Wealthy, Woke Elitists
“The New Leviathan,” David Horowitz and Jacob Laksin
- In the conventional wisdom, it is Republicans and the political right, with their corporate sponsors and big-money donors who make up the “party of the rich,” while progressives speak for the poor and powerless.
- And conservatives are agents of an economic “ruling class” organized to defend its social privileges.
- And Democrats are the party of “working Americans and their families.”
- “They're for the powerful, we're for the people!” Al Gore, http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs_nf=1&gs_mss=Al%20Gore%3A%20They&pq=obtunded%20definition&cp=38&gs_id=6g&xhr=t&q=Al%20Gore%3A%20They're%20for%20the%20powerful%3B%20we're%20for%20the%20people&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=Al+Gore:+They're+for+the+powerful%3B+we're+for+the+people&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=708bd950daecd80b&biw=1152&bih=773
- This is standard progressive folklore. Provably false.
- As of 2009, the financial assets of the 115 major tax-exempt foundations of the Left add up to $104.56 billlion. Not only is this total not less than the financial assets of the 75 foundations of the Right, it was more than ten times greater! [p. 8]
- Bradley, Olin, Scaife, the “Big Three” conservative foundations, not one has assets exceeding $1 billion. (Olin has been defunct since 2005).
Bradley Foundation, $623 million.
- Fourteen progressive foundations do, including Gates, Ford, Robert Wood Johnson, Hewlett, Kellogg, Packard, MacArthur, Mellon, Rockefeller, Casey, Carnegie, Simons, Heinz, and the Open Society Institute.
Soros has claimed that he has donated over $7 billion to his Open Society organizations.
The leading Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, $33 billion.
- With over $100 billion in tax-exempt assets at their disposal, left-wing foundations have been able to invest massively greater amounts in their beneficiary groups. Ford gave more in one year than Scaife in 40!
- “By compiling a computerized record of nearly all his contributions over the last four decades, The Washington Post found that Scaife and his family's charitable entities have given at least $340 million to conservative causes and institutions… The Ford Foundation gave away $491 million in 1998 alone.” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/scaifemain050299.htm
Fahr LLC, Renaissance Technologies, Paloma Partners, Newsweb Corp., NextGen Climate, Priorities USA, Soros …..to the Democrats: $311 million
Los Vegas Sands, Adelson Clinic, Elliott Management, Renaissance Technologies….to Republicans: $110 million
Organization Profiles
- Soros money supported and catalyzed theMcCain-Feingold Act, which banned ‘soft money,’ stripping the two major parties of their financial base. This allowed Soros to create a “Shadow Party,” designed to funnel massive amounts of capital into organizations that would assume the role that the political parties traditionally played.
- A 527 group is a private, tax-exempt political organization set up under Section 527 of the U.S. tax code. Such groups have been around for years but never took center stage until 2004, when they became major players. That's because McCain-Feingold shut the door on unlimited contributions (so-called "soft money") to political parties, so that many of the big-dollar donations began flowing to 527 groups instead. McCain-Feingold at Rest
Oddball
Unobtanium Member
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
The Correction was not only confirmed this past week but more downside is now likely to occur- Started by Luckyone
- Replies: 0
-
-
Lessons from cops - How they act when interrogating criminals
- Started by Robert W
- Replies: 0
