Gay couples have the same rights to marriage that everybody else has. A gay man can marry a woman, which is the same right a straight man has. It's equal protection.
By the way, here's what kind of bullcrap we'd put up with if you repealed all minimum sentencing laws.
There was an 18 year old man named Jorge Pabon-Cruz who was caught trafficking in more than 8,000 child pornography images into the country. Now, we're not talking "technically child porn" of 16 and 17 year olds. This is hardcore stuff going all the way down to infants. This is the most vile stuff I think anybody on the planet can look at. The minimum sentence for such a crime is ten years in this country. However, Judge Gerard E. Lynch thought that was too harsh for someone who had helped get profit for the sickos that raped the infants and got these pictures to the sickos that want to see them. During the course of the trial, Lynch urged the prosecution to reconsider the charge or plea bargain, in clear violation of the judge's code of ethics, which demands impartiality. Lynch even violated the law by telling the jury what sentence he would be given before they gave a verdict. At the sentencing hearing, Pabon-Cruz told the judge, "I didn't know it was wrong," a blatant lie. You'd have to be mentally handicapped (and he's not) or mentally ill (also a negative) to be 18 and not think child porn is wrong. Judge Lynch sentenced him to 10 years because his hands were tied. Lynch kept saying that it was the worst decision he had to make and that someone who was "barely more than a child" shouldn't have to serve ten years in prison. If it were up to me, the kid would've gotten the ten years, since he had no priors, but would've gotten two more for telling such a bald-faced lie. If it were up to Lynch, he'd get a fine and community service and would be free to keep trafficking in the kiddy porn. The reason there are minimum sentencing laws is to protect the citizens from idiot judges who try to portray drug dealers and child pornographers, among others, as victims. In truth, these people make victims and need to be locked up.
I originally heard about this story on Bill O'Reilly's "Radio Factor," but the original story is in "The New York Times," which spins it in the judge's favor. I read the article first (found the topic on the web, where it was posted 4 hours before the show is aired here) and was outraged before I heard O'Reilly's opinion on it, so Acludem can't just accuse me of buying in to the "conservative media spin" he's so fixed on.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F30611FB39540C708DDDA80894DC404482