The Duke
Diamond Member
- Jul 30, 2022
- 37,129
- 47,476
- 2,788
That's illegal.And lavish gifts from billionaires with opinions.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's illegal.And lavish gifts from billionaires with opinions.
Mac doesn't know, because he's incapable of discerning.Nah. He’s a piece of shit. As you well know.
Yet it goes on.That's illegal.
Of course you haven't. Your propagandists wouldn't dare show him to you.Never heard of the guy.
So there are no liberal judges either, right?I fail to see why a judge should be "conservative" and not "impartial".![]()
One cannot be neutral when it comes to a threat to our democracy and the rule of law, dipshit.The moment a neutral arbiter reveals himself to be partisan....he is no longer neutral.
You have got to be joking.There's absolutely no reason for a judge to have any political overtones whatever.
There should not be conservative or liberal judges.So there are no liberal judges either, right?
No, I'm not joking.You have got to be joking.
You cannot possibly be this ignorant of American history.There should not be conservative or liberal judges.
There may be, but that should not be the case and is a recent occurence in America.
Hey fucktard! Elaborate on how & why he is "ignorant of American History" or Stfu.You cannot possibly be this ignorant of American history.
On the other hand, your ignorance certainly explains how easily you are gaslighted.
It is simply astounding just how dumbed down your propagandists have made you.
You know I actually did research on propaganda in the media in 2014?Hey fucktard! Elaborate on how & why he is "ignorant of American History" or Stfu.
All you're doing is babbling. How is he wrong, smooth brain? You are saying nothing so far.
Well , simply by default..strict adherance to the constitution would be more favorable to conservative interests than leftist ones. That's why they say the constitution is "a living & breathing document. That view of the constitution is constitutionally invalid. Anyone on any bench who says the constitution is a living breathing document should be kicked off the court & jailed indefinitely for treason against the American people.There should not be conservative or liberal judges.
There may be, but that should not be the case and is a recent occurence in America.
You know that isn't and will not be the case, but it sure would be nice.Well , simply by default..strict adherance to the constitution would be more favorable to conservative interests than leftist ones. That's why they say the constitution is "a living & breathing document. That view of the constitution is constitutionally invalid. Anyone on any bench who says the constitution is a living breathing document should be kicked off the court & jailed indefinitely for treason against the American people.
It needs to happen.You know that isn't and will not be the case, but it sure would be nice.
10 Amendments had to be added before the Founders would even ratify the thing. Their "original intent" included having an amendment process and the SC deciding whether legislation was constitutional or not.Anyone on any bench who says the constitution is a living breathing document should be kicked off the court & jailed indefinitely for treason against the American people.
Try "10 Amendments", rough bwain.The 10th amendment