Conservative Bible

[Taz]

I explained what science says. You don’t like what science says.

Taz has no idea if he/she likes what science says or not. He/she isn't capable of understanding your explanation, even when you draw pictures. Taz just assumes that science agrees with his/her perceptions of the world as the epitome of knowledge, and then runs with it.

He's not the only one. I am beginning to believe that people don't want to believe in a Creator.

Well; yeah. You think arrogant, self-absorbed leftist navel-gazers want to deal with the fact that they're not the pinnacle of all existence, and that there might be a higher life form and higher authority than themselves?

That's the thing that's odd though, they literally deny that humans are the pinnacle of existence even though the data we have at our disposal overwhelmingly says we are.

lol.... the pinnacle of existence? How very arrogant and vain of you, your highness. what about the angels in heaven? the cherubim and seraphim?

If you think that human beings are as good as it gets, your god who needs 'us' to experience the material world, (whoever us is), is a fuck up.

So where are your angels in heaven? Where is that? Please provide scientific proof.

 

[hobelim]

Taz has no idea if he/she likes what science says or not. He/she isn't capable of understanding your explanation, even when you draw pictures. Taz just assumes that science agrees with his/her perceptions of the world as the epitome of knowledge, and then runs with it.

He's not the only one. I am beginning to believe that people don't want to believe in a Creator.

Well; yeah. You think arrogant, self-absorbed leftist navel-gazers want to deal with the fact that they're not the pinnacle of all existence, and that there might be a higher life form and higher authority than themselves?

That's the thing that's odd though, they literally deny that humans are the pinnacle of existence even though the data we have at our disposal overwhelmingly says we are.

lol.... the pinnacle of existence? How very arrogant and vain of you, your highness. what about the angels in heaven? the cherubim and seraphim?

If you think that human beings are as good as it gets, your god who needs 'us' to experience the material world, (whoever us is), is a fuck up.

So where are your angels in heaven? Where is that? Please provide scientific proof.

Thats classified. They are in the witness protection program being kept safe from degenerate perverts like you.

 

[Taz]

He's not the only one. I am beginning to believe that people don't want to believe in a Creator.

Well; yeah. You think arrogant, self-absorbed leftist navel-gazers want to deal with the fact that they're not the pinnacle of all existence, and that there might be a higher life form and higher authority than themselves?

That's the thing that's odd though, they literally deny that humans are the pinnacle of existence even though the data we have at our disposal overwhelmingly says we are.

lol.... the pinnacle of existence? How very arrogant and vain of you, your highness. what about the angels in heaven? the cherubim and seraphim?

If you think that human beings are as good as it gets, your god who needs 'us' to experience the material world, (whoever us is), is a fuck up.

So where are your angels in heaven? Where is that? Please provide scientific proof.

Thats classified. They are in the witness protection program being kept safe from degenerate perverts like you.

So you have nothing, WHAT A FUCKING SURPRISE!!!!!!!!!

 

[hobelim]

Well; yeah. You think arrogant, self-absorbed leftist navel-gazers want to deal with the fact that they're not the pinnacle of all existence, and that there might be a higher life form and higher authority than themselves?

That's the thing that's odd though, they literally deny that humans are the pinnacle of existence even though the data we have at our disposal overwhelmingly says we are.

lol.... the pinnacle of existence? How very arrogant and vain of you, your highness. what about the angels in heaven? the cherubim and seraphim?

If you think that human beings are as good as it gets, your god who needs 'us' to experience the material world, (whoever us is), is a fuck up.

So where are your angels in heaven? Where is that? Please provide scientific proof.

Thats classified. They are in the witness protection program being kept safe from degenerate perverts like you.

So you have nothing, WHAT A FUCKING SURPRISE!!!!!!!!!

Yes! Exactly. If thats all you can see. What you see is what you get. Nothing. Congratulations!

 

[ding]

I explained what science says. You don’t like what science says.

Taz has no idea if he/she likes what science says or not. He/she isn't capable of understanding your explanation, even when you draw pictures. Taz just assumes that science agrees with his/her perceptions of the world as the epitome of knowledge, and then runs with it.

He's not the only one. I am beginning to believe that people don't want to believe in a Creator.

Well; yeah. You think arrogant, self-absorbed leftist navel-gazers want to deal with the fact that they're not the pinnacle of all existence, and that there might be a higher life form and higher authority than themselves?

That's the thing that's odd though, they literally deny that humans are the pinnacle of existence even though the data we have at our disposal overwhelmingly says we are.

lol.... the pinnacle of existence? How very arrogant and vain of you, your highness. what about the angels in heaven? the cherubim and seraphim?

If you think that human beings are as good as it gets, your god who needs 'us' to experience the material world, (whoever us is), is a fuck up.

Absolutely. Beings that know and create (i.e. intelligence) are the most complex thing produced by the creation of space and time. It's not even close. Look it up for yourself.

Angels are not products of the creation of the material world.

 

[ding]

I explained what science says. You don’t like what science says.

Taz has no idea if he/she likes what science says or not. He/she isn't capable of understanding your explanation, even when you draw pictures. Taz just assumes that science agrees with his/her perceptions of the world as the epitome of knowledge, and then runs with it.

He's not the only one. I am beginning to believe that people don't want to believe in a Creator.

Well; yeah. You think arrogant, self-absorbed leftist navel-gazers want to deal with the fact that they're not the pinnacle of all existence, and that there might be a higher life form and higher authority than themselves?

That's the thing that's odd though, they literally deny that humans are the pinnacle of existence even though the data we have at our disposal overwhelmingly says we are.

So you know for sure that there aren't other beings in the universe that are more advanced than we are?

It doesn't matter, Taz. Intelligence is the most complex thing that the creation of space and time has produced. So if there are other beings out there that know and create, the pinnacle of creation comment applies to them as well.

 

[ding]

I’ve explained it to you like a dozen times already. You are the one blowing fart smoke.

You explained your own theory, not what science says.

I explained what science says. You don’t like what science says.

Taz has no idea if he/she likes what science says or not. He/she isn't capable of understanding your explanation, even when you draw pictures. Taz just assumes that science agrees with his/her perceptions of the world as the epitome of knowledge, and then runs with it.

He's not the only one. I am beginning to believe that some people don't want to believe in a Creator.

Only one you can confirm with a real science site. But you can't, that's why you never refer to any.

That seems to be your consistent argument but I have provided those links many times. You dismissed them each and every time. You on the other hand have never produced any evidence to support your beliefs.

So go ahead and prove me wrong now. We both know you can't. You don't even have a concise position on what you believe so you wouldn't even know what to look for.

 

[Taz]

Taz has no idea if he/she likes what science says or not. He/she isn't capable of understanding your explanation, even when you draw pictures. Taz just assumes that science agrees with his/her perceptions of the world as the epitome of knowledge, and then runs with it.

He's not the only one. I am beginning to believe that people don't want to believe in a Creator.

Well; yeah. You think arrogant, self-absorbed leftist navel-gazers want to deal with the fact that they're not the pinnacle of all existence, and that there might be a higher life form and higher authority than themselves?

That's the thing that's odd though, they literally deny that humans are the pinnacle of existence even though the data we have at our disposal overwhelmingly says we are.

So you know for sure that there aren't other beings in the universe that are more advanced than we are?

It doesn't matter, Taz. Intelligence is the most complex thing that the creation of space and time has produced. So if there are other beings out there that know and create, the pinnacle of creation comment applies to them as well.

You don’t know if that’s the pinnacle because you don’t know what’s out there in the universe.

 

[Taz]

You explained your own theory, not what science says.

I explained what science says. You don’t like what science says.

Taz has no idea if he/she likes what science says or not. He/she isn't capable of understanding your explanation, even when you draw pictures. Taz just assumes that science agrees with his/her perceptions of the world as the epitome of knowledge, and then runs with it.

He's not the only one. I am beginning to believe that some people don't want to believe in a Creator.

Only one you can confirm with a real science site. But you can't, that's why you never refer to any.

That seems to be your consistent argument but I have provided those links many times. You dismissed them each and every time. You on the other hand have never produced any evidence to support your beliefs.

So go ahead and prove me wrong now. We both know you can't. You don't even have a concise position on what you believe so you wouldn't even know what to look for.

You say that science backs up your claim for a creator. Prove it or stfu.

 

[ding]

He's not the only one. I am beginning to believe that people don't want to believe in a Creator.

Well; yeah. You think arrogant, self-absorbed leftist navel-gazers want to deal with the fact that they're not the pinnacle of all existence, and that there might be a higher life form and higher authority than themselves?

That's the thing that's odd though, they literally deny that humans are the pinnacle of existence even though the data we have at our disposal overwhelmingly says we are.

So you know for sure that there aren't other beings in the universe that are more advanced than we are?

It doesn't matter, Taz. Intelligence is the most complex thing that the creation of space and time has produced. So if there are other beings out there that know and create, the pinnacle of creation comment applies to them as well.

You don’t know if that’s the pinnacle because you don’t know what’s out there in the universe.

Can you name something more complex than intelligence? No. You don't even have the knowledge of the different types of evolution of space and time to even properly assess what kind of things could be more complex than intelligence.

 

[ding]

I explained what science says. You don’t like what science says.

Taz has no idea if he/she likes what science says or not. He/she isn't capable of understanding your explanation, even when you draw pictures. Taz just assumes that science agrees with his/her perceptions of the world as the epitome of knowledge, and then runs with it.

He's not the only one. I am beginning to believe that some people don't want to believe in a Creator.

Only one you can confirm with a real science site. But you can't, that's why you never refer to any.

That seems to be your consistent argument but I have provided those links many times. You dismissed them each and every time. You on the other hand have never produced any evidence to support your beliefs.

So go ahead and prove me wrong now. We both know you can't. You don't even have a concise position on what you believe so you wouldn't even know what to look for.

You say that science backs up your claim for a creator. Prove it or stfu.

The evidence is what was created and how it was created and the laws of nature which governed its creation. And the proof is that matter and energy cannot exist outside of space and time. So the only thing that can create space and time is no thing (which is exactly what science tells us). Spirit is no thing. God is spirit. You guys can't comprehend what I am explaining because you guys can't comprehend the requirements of existing outside of space and time. God is not matter and energy like us and God exists outside of our four dimension space time. So you guys can't comprehend or accept that consciousness without form can exist outside of space and time even though science tells us that only something like consciousness without form can exist outside of space and time. It is literally your ignorance of science which prevents you from exploring the possibility of what I am talking about.

 

[Taz]

Well; yeah. You think arrogant, self-absorbed leftist navel-gazers want to deal with the fact that they're not the pinnacle of all existence, and that there might be a higher life form and higher authority than themselves?

That's the thing that's odd though, they literally deny that humans are the pinnacle of existence even though the data we have at our disposal overwhelmingly says we are.

So you know for sure that there aren't other beings in the universe that are more advanced than we are?

It doesn't matter, Taz. Intelligence is the most complex thing that the creation of space and time has produced. So if there are other beings out there that know and create, the pinnacle of creation comment applies to them as well.

You don’t know if that’s the pinnacle because you don’t know what’s out there in the universe.

Can you name something more complex than intelligence? No. You don't even have the knowledge of the different types of evolution of space and time to even properly assess what kind of things could be more complex than intelligence.

I can’t know what’s out there in the universe. You pretend to.

 

[Taz]

Taz has no idea if he/she likes what science says or not. He/she isn't capable of understanding your explanation, even when you draw pictures. Taz just assumes that science agrees with his/her perceptions of the world as the epitome of knowledge, and then runs with it.

He's not the only one. I am beginning to believe that some people don't want to believe in a Creator.

Only one you can confirm with a real science site. But you can't, that's why you never refer to any.

That seems to be your consistent argument but I have provided those links many times. You dismissed them each and every time. You on the other hand have never produced any evidence to support your beliefs.

So go ahead and prove me wrong now. We both know you can't. You don't even have a concise position on what you believe so you wouldn't even know what to look for.

You say that science backs up your claim for a creator. Prove it or stfu.

The evidence is what was created and how it was created and the laws of nature which governed its creation. And the proof is that matter and energy cannot exist outside of space and time. So the only thing that can create space and time is no thing (which is exactly what science tells us). Spirit is no thing. God is spirit. You guys can't comprehend what I am explaining because you guys can't comprehend the requirements of existing outside of space and time. God is not matter and energy like us and God exists outside of our four dimension space time. So you guys can't comprehend or accept that consciousness without form can exist outside of space and time even though science tells us that only something like consciousness without form can exist outside of space and time. It is literally your ignorance of science which prevents you from exploring the possibility of what I am talking about.

Science doesn’t prove god. Please try again.

 

[ding]

That's the thing that's odd though, they literally deny that humans are the pinnacle of existence even though the data we have at our disposal overwhelmingly says we are.

So you know for sure that there aren't other beings in the universe that are more advanced than we are?

It doesn't matter, Taz. Intelligence is the most complex thing that the creation of space and time has produced. So if there are other beings out there that know and create, the pinnacle of creation comment applies to them as well.

You don’t know if that’s the pinnacle because you don’t know what’s out there in the universe.

Can you name something more complex than intelligence? No. You don't even have the knowledge of the different types of evolution of space and time to even properly assess what kind of things could be more complex than intelligence.

I can’t know what’s out there in the universe. You pretend to.

You can't think of anything more complex than intelligence because whatever you think of would have intelligence.

 

[ding]

He's not the only one. I am beginning to believe that some people don't want to believe in a Creator.

Only one you can confirm with a real science site. But you can't, that's why you never refer to any.

That seems to be your consistent argument but I have provided those links many times. You dismissed them each and every time. You on the other hand have never produced any evidence to support your beliefs.

So go ahead and prove me wrong now. We both know you can't. You don't even have a concise position on what you believe so you wouldn't even know what to look for.

You say that science backs up your claim for a creator. Prove it or stfu.

The evidence is what was created and how it was created and the laws of nature which governed its creation. And the proof is that matter and energy cannot exist outside of space and time. So the only thing that can create space and time is no thing (which is exactly what science tells us). Spirit is no thing. God is spirit. You guys can't comprehend what I am explaining because you guys can't comprehend the requirements of existing outside of space and time. God is not matter and energy like us and God exists outside of our four dimension space time. So you guys can't comprehend or accept that consciousness without form can exist outside of space and time even though science tells us that only something like consciousness without form can exist outside of space and time. It is literally your ignorance of science which prevents you from exploring the possibility of what I am talking about.

Science doesn’t prove god. Please try again.

Actually it does. I just explained it to you.

Can you explain what I wrote that you disagreed with?

 

[Taz]

So you know for sure that there aren't other beings in the universe that are more advanced than we are?

It doesn't matter, Taz. Intelligence is the most complex thing that the creation of space and time has produced. So if there are other beings out there that know and create, the pinnacle of creation comment applies to them as well.

You don’t know if that’s the pinnacle because you don’t know what’s out there in the universe.

Can you name something more complex than intelligence? No. You don't even have the knowledge of the different types of evolution of space and time to even properly assess what kind of things could be more complex than intelligence.

I can’t know what’s out there in the universe. You pretend to.

You can't think of anything more complex than intelligence because whatever you think of would have intelligence.

You can’t know what’s in the whole universe. Making you a fool.

 

[Taz]

Only one you can confirm with a real science site. But you can't, that's why you never refer to any.

That seems to be your consistent argument but I have provided those links many times. You dismissed them each and every time. You on the other hand have never produced any evidence to support your beliefs.

So go ahead and prove me wrong now. We both know you can't. You don't even have a concise position on what you believe so you wouldn't even know what to look for.

You say that science backs up your claim for a creator. Prove it or stfu.

The evidence is what was created and how it was created and the laws of nature which governed its creation. And the proof is that matter and energy cannot exist outside of space and time. So the only thing that can create space and time is no thing (which is exactly what science tells us). Spirit is no thing. God is spirit. You guys can't comprehend what I am explaining because you guys can't comprehend the requirements of existing outside of space and time. God is not matter and energy like us and God exists outside of our four dimension space time. So you guys can't comprehend or accept that consciousness without form can exist outside of space and time even though science tells us that only something like consciousness without form can exist outside of space and time. It is literally your ignorance of science which prevents you from exploring the possibility of what I am talking about.

Science doesn’t prove god. Please try again.

Actually it does. I just explained it to you.

Can you explain what I wrote that you disagreed with?

Ya, what you wrote isn’t backed up by science.

 

[ding]

It doesn't matter, Taz. Intelligence is the most complex thing that the creation of space and time has produced. So if there are other beings out there that know and create, the pinnacle of creation comment applies to them as well.

You don’t know if that’s the pinnacle because you don’t know what’s out there in the universe.

Can you name something more complex than intelligence? No. You don't even have the knowledge of the different types of evolution of space and time to even properly assess what kind of things could be more complex than intelligence.

I can’t know what’s out there in the universe. You pretend to.

You can't think of anything more complex than intelligence because whatever you think of would have intelligence.

You can’t know what’s in the whole universe. Making you a fool.

I know that there isn't anything in the universe that is more complex than thought.

 

[ding]

That seems to be your consistent argument but I have provided those links many times. You dismissed them each and every time. You on the other hand have never produced any evidence to support your beliefs.

So go ahead and prove me wrong now. We both know you can't. You don't even have a concise position on what you believe so you wouldn't even know what to look for.

You say that science backs up your claim for a creator. Prove it or stfu.

The evidence is what was created and how it was created and the laws of nature which governed its creation. And the proof is that matter and energy cannot exist outside of space and time. So the only thing that can create space and time is no thing (which is exactly what science tells us). Spirit is no thing. God is spirit. You guys can't comprehend what I am explaining because you guys can't comprehend the requirements of existing outside of space and time. God is not matter and energy like us and God exists outside of our four dimension space time. So you guys can't comprehend or accept that consciousness without form can exist outside of space and time even though science tells us that only something like consciousness without form can exist outside of space and time. It is literally your ignorance of science which prevents you from exploring the possibility of what I am talking about.

Science doesn’t prove god. Please try again.

Actually it does. I just explained it to you.

Can you explain what I wrote that you disagreed with?

Ya, what you wrote isn’t backed up by science.

Sure it is.

Here you go.



Too bad you can't explain what you disagreed with or provide a link to back it up.

 

[ding]

“The human brain has 100 billion neurons, each neuron connected to 10 thousand other neurons. Sitting on your shoulders is the most complicated object in the known universe.” Dr. Michio Kaku