Cons say the government doesn't create jobs....

[Redfish]

A bridge over the river is an interstate matter.
you lose.

Who pays?

If the state on either side (lets call them "red" states) cannot afford a bridge

If you can't afford something, you dont buy it.
This is logic libs just can't grasp.

Libertarian paradise

your liberal paradise has put the country 18 trillion in debt. we are borrowing 40% of what the govt spends every year. How long will you libs support the fiscal destruction of our country?

Reaganomics put us on the path to debt

We haven't loked back since.......as Cheney says....deficits don't matter

Obama will have addeed over 20 trillion to the debt. Is that reagan's fault? Bush added about 4 T. Obama has added 10T.

Reagonomics worked. Clinton benefitted more than any president from Reagonomics.

 

[Redfish]

your liberal paradise has put the country 18 trillion in debt. we are borrowing 40% of what the govt spends every year. How long will you libs support the fiscal destruction of our country?

Reaganomics put us on the path to debt

We haven't loked back since.......as Cheney says....deficits don't matter

There was no federal debt prior to Reagan? Wow, who knew?

Reagan tripled the debt.....what he called a good start

But debt never mattered to Republicans.....until a Democrat became President

Obama adde\d more debt than every other president combined. WHy arent you complaining?

There goes your Rabbi math again

11+ 7 = 22

when obozo took over the debt was 10.6, it will be 22 or more when he leaves. He will have added more than all previous presidents combined. That is a FACT.

 

[rightwinger]

Who pays?

If the state on either side (lets call them "red" states) cannot afford a bridge

If you can't afford something, you dont buy it.
This is logic libs just can't grasp.

Libertarian paradise

your liberal paradise has put the country 18 trillion in debt. we are borrowing 40% of what the govt spends every year. How long will you libs support the fiscal destruction of our country?

Reaganomics put us on the path to debt

We haven't loked back since.......as Cheney says....deficits don't matter

Obama will have addeed over 20 trillion to the debt. Is that reagan's fault? Bush added about 4 T. Obama has added 10T.

Reagonomics worked. Clinton benefitted more than any president from Reagonomics.

WOW....now he has added $20 trillion to the debt
Bringing us to a grand total of $31 trillion in debt

Any other numbers you want to throw at us?

 

[The Rabbi]

There was no federal debt prior to Reagan? Wow, who knew?

Reagan tripled the debt.....what he called a good start

But debt never mattered to Republicans.....until a Democrat became President

Obama adde\d more debt than every other president combined. WHy arent you complaining?

There goes your Rabbi math again

11+ 7 = 22

More distortion. The facts are there. Obama is the biggest spender in history.

Rabbi and his math......gotta love it
He tries so hard

Facts are just not your friends. Actually Haldol is your friend. Or ought to be.

 

[Redfish]

If you can't afford something, you dont buy it.
This is logic libs just can't grasp.

Libertarian paradise

your liberal paradise has put the country 18 trillion in debt. we are borrowing 40% of what the govt spends every year. How long will you libs support the fiscal destruction of our country?

Reaganomics put us on the path to debt

We haven't loked back since.......as Cheney says....deficits don't matter

Obama will have addeed over 20 trillion to the debt. Is that reagan's fault? Bush added about 4 T. Obama has added 10T.

Reagonomics worked. Clinton benefitted more than any president from Reagonomics.

WOW....now he has added $20 trillion to the debt
Bringing us to a grand total of $31 trillion in debt

Any other numbers you want to throw at us?

typo, he will have added over 10 Trillion. when he leaves the debt will be around 22T, it was 10.6 when he took office.

 

[rightwinger]

Reaganomics put us on the path to debt

We haven't loked back since.......as Cheney says....deficits don't matter

There was no federal debt prior to Reagan? Wow, who knew?

Reagan tripled the debt.....what he called a good start

But debt never mattered to Republicans.....until a Democrat became President

Obama adde\d more debt than every other president combined. WHy arent you complaining?

There goes your Rabbi math again

11+ 7 = 22

when obozo took over the debt was 10.6, it will be 22 or more when he leaves. He will have added more than all previous presidents combined. That is a FACT.

The more you try math the worse you do

How do we get from $18 trillion to $22 trillion in a year and a half?

 

[Redfish]

Reagan tripled the debt.....what he called a good start

But debt never mattered to Republicans.....until a Democrat became President

Obama adde\d more debt than every other president combined. WHy arent you complaining?

There goes your Rabbi math again

11+ 7 = 22

More distortion. The facts are there. Obama is the biggest spender in history.

Rabbi and his math......gotta love it
He tries so hard

Facts are just not your friends. Actually Haldol is your friend. Or ought to be.

I am convinced that winger is not a human being but a computer that is programmed to spit out dem talking points and lies all day. He is a parrot robot. No brain, just a hard line to the DNC

 

[The Rabbi]

There was no federal debt prior to Reagan? Wow, who knew?

Reagan tripled the debt.....what he called a good start

But debt never mattered to Republicans.....until a Democrat became President

Obama adde\d more debt than every other president combined. WHy arent you complaining?

There goes your Rabbi math again

11+ 7 = 22

when obozo took over the debt was 10.6, it will be 22 or more when he leaves. He will have added more than all previous presidents combined. That is a FACT.

The more you try math the worse you do

How do we get from $18 trillion to $22 trillion in a year and a half?

A lot of spending.

 

[Redfish]

There was no federal debt prior to Reagan? Wow, who knew?

Reagan tripled the debt.....what he called a good start

But debt never mattered to Republicans.....until a Democrat became President

Obama adde\d more debt than every other president combined. WHy arent you complaining?

There goes your Rabbi math again

11+ 7 = 22

when obozo took over the debt was 10.6, it will be 22 or more when he leaves. He will have added more than all previous presidents combined. That is a FACT.

The more you try math the worse you do

How do we get from $18 trillion to $22 trillion in a year and a half?

The 22 is your number from a few posts ago. But you are probably right.

 

[rightwinger]

Reagan tripled the debt.....what he called a good start

But debt never mattered to Republicans.....until a Democrat became President

Obama adde\d more debt than every other president combined. WHy arent you complaining?

There goes your Rabbi math again

11+ 7 = 22

More distortion. The facts are there. Obama is the biggest spender in history.

Rabbi and his math......gotta love it
He tries so hard

Facts are just not your friends. Actually Haldol is your friend. Or ought to be.

What is it with conservatives and math?

Is math one of those "elitist" subjects that you avoid?

 

[Redfish]

Reagan tripled the debt.....what he called a good start

But debt never mattered to Republicans.....until a Democrat became President

Obama adde\d more debt than every other president combined. WHy arent you complaining?

There goes your Rabbi math again

11+ 7 = 22

when obozo took over the debt was 10.6, it will be 22 or more when he leaves. He will have added more than all previous presidents combined. That is a FACT.

The more you try math the worse you do

How do we get from $18 trillion to $22 trillion in a year and a half?

A lot of spending.

and a lot of borrowing. we currently borrow 40% of what the govt spends. That is fiscal lunacy.

 

[rightwinger]

Reagan tripled the debt.....what he called a good start

But debt never mattered to Republicans.....until a Democrat became President

Obama adde\d more debt than every other president combined. WHy arent you complaining?

There goes your Rabbi math again

11+ 7 = 22

when obozo took over the debt was 10.6, it will be 22 or more when he leaves. He will have added more than all previous presidents combined. That is a FACT.

The more you try math the worse you do

How do we get from $18 trillion to $22 trillion in a year and a half?

The 22 is your number from a few posts ago. But you are probably right.

The 22 trillion was what it would take to satisfy The Rabbis bogus "Obama doubled the debt"
2 x 11 = 22

 

[The Rabbi]

Obama adde\d more debt than every other president combined. WHy arent you complaining?

There goes your Rabbi math again

11+ 7 = 22

when obozo took over the debt was 10.6, it will be 22 or more when he leaves. He will have added more than all previous presidents combined. That is a FACT.

The more you try math the worse you do

How do we get from $18 trillion to $22 trillion in a year and a half?

The 22 is your number from a few posts ago. But you are probably right.

The 22 trillion was what it would take to satisfy The Rabbis bogus "Obama doubled the debt"
2 x 11 = 22

SO if he adds 90% rather than 100% is that somehow OK?

 

[Redfish]

Obama adde\d more debt than every other president combined. WHy arent you complaining?

There goes your Rabbi math again

11+ 7 = 22

More distortion. The facts are there. Obama is the biggest spender in history.

Rabbi and his math......gotta love it
He tries so hard

Facts are just not your friends. Actually Haldol is your friend. Or ought to be.

What is it with conservatives and math?

Is math one of those "elitist" subjects that you avoid?

Hmmm, and thinking for oneself is the subject that you libs avoid. Rabbi's math is correct. Obozo will have doubled the debt by the time he leaves office. Whether its 22T or 20T or 21T. he will have added more than all previous presidents combined.

 

[Redfish]

Obama adde\d more debt than every other president combined. WHy arent you complaining?

There goes your Rabbi math again

11+ 7 = 22

when obozo took over the debt was 10.6, it will be 22 or more when he leaves. He will have added more than all previous presidents combined. That is a FACT.

The more you try math the worse you do

How do we get from $18 trillion to $22 trillion in a year and a half?

The 22 is your number from a few posts ago. But you are probably right.

The 22 trillion was what it would take to satisfy The Rabbis bogus "Obama doubled the debt"
2 x 11 = 22

actually 10.6 times 2 is 21.2. and that is very likely to happen.

 

[Redfish]

There goes your Rabbi math again

11+ 7 = 22

when obozo took over the debt was 10.6, it will be 22 or more when he leaves. He will have added more than all previous presidents combined. That is a FACT.

The more you try math the worse you do

How do we get from $18 trillion to $22 trillion in a year and a half?

The 22 is your number from a few posts ago. But you are probably right.

The 22 trillion was what it would take to satisfy The Rabbis bogus "Obama doubled the debt"
2 x 11 = 22

SO if he adds 90% rather than 100% is that somehow OK?

you just caused RW's computer to overload. he has no programmed answer for that.

 

[rightwinger]

There goes your Rabbi math again

11+ 7 = 22

More distortion. The facts are there. Obama is the biggest spender in history.

Rabbi and his math......gotta love it
He tries so hard

Facts are just not your friends. Actually Haldol is your friend. Or ought to be.

What is it with conservatives and math?

Is math one of those "elitist" subjects that you avoid?

Hmmm, and thinking for oneself is the subject that you libs avoid. Rabbi's math is correct. Obozo will have doubled the debt by the time he leaves office. Whether its 22T or 20T or 21T. he will have added more than all previous presidents combined.

This is getting embarassing showing conservatives how math works

It is not hard. Get yourself a calculator and use the "+" key

 

[mikegriffith1]

The majority of government jobs are unnecessary and in many cases overlap with other jobs in other agencies. In most cases, government does not create real jobs, i.e., jobs that consumers would support if given the choice. In most government jobs, there is little if any consequence for failure or poor performance. In most cases, government is an expense, not an investment.

If government truly created real jobs, Greece, Spain, Italy, England, etc., would be economic powerhouses and would be enjoying robust growth.

 

[Boss]

The majority of government jobs are unnecessary and in many cases overlap with other jobs in other agencies. In most cases, government does not create real jobs, i.e., jobs that consumers would support if given the choice. In most government jobs, there is little if any consequence for failure or poor performance. In most cases, government is an expense, not an investment.

If government truly created real jobs, Greece, Spain, Italy, England, etc., would be economic powerhouses and would be enjoying robust growth.

Exactly! It's not that government CAN'T create jobs... Our problem is they CAN! Every one of them costs us money and make absolutely nothing... (other than bureaucratic problems for others.) Government can't create jobs and stimulate the economy by doing it because the jobs they create are not private sector capitalist free enterprise jobs. We should actually call "government jobs" by a different name... like maybe "anti-jobs!"

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

As long as my federal tax dollars aren't being wasted funding another state's infrastructure budget. Once again, and it's very clear, it's NOT the responsibility of the Federal Government to maintain our states' infrastructure.

However, it very much IS the responsibility of our nation's government to provide funding for our military, which includes maintaining and replacing it's aging aircraft as well as equipment. You see this is why Democrats complain about our troops not being adequately supplied with important necessities like armoured vehicles and vests, but then forget that it's a direct result of their OWN party cutting that funding while still expecting our military to be adequately equipped during a time of combat. This is the problem with giving the role of our Federal Government things it was never meant to do, while neglecting those responsibilities for which they are.

Nonsense

The job should be done at the level that is most efficient and makes the most sense

Some infrastructure projects are too important and require too much funding to be handled at the state level. Providing some federal funding makes sense

No. This is why the state has something called a BUDGET, it's not my fault another state has mismanaged their revenue and neglected their responsibility to upkeep their roads and bridges. If the state misappropriates their funds, that's the states fault, my federal tax dollars should not pay for what is clearly the responsibility of the state to do - period! This is NOT a role that's allocated to our Federal Government, let them manage their OWN funds and be responsibe for their own decisions
(wow! A state that actually has some accountability and responsibility to its taxpayers, now there's a novel concept)

Some states are wealthier than other states

States without a strong source of revenue (lets call them "red states") cannot afford major infrastructure improvements. Lets say one of those red states is on the Mississippi River. A bridge over the river is critical to interstate commerce. Should we allow east west traffic to end because a state is too cheap to build a bridge?

A bridge over the river is an interstate matter.
you lose.

Who pays?

If the state on either side (lets call them "red" states) cannot afford a bridge

Rightwinger, what part of tolls, a state collecting revenue through an added gas tax, and having a state budget did you not quite understand? Who do you think pays tolls and taxes? As far as your "state" reference in your response: have you ever traveled through Pennsylvania to see how that state manages to maintain a lot of their roads? Now would you care to tell us what color the state of Pennsylvania is?