Conny — Short For Conservatism

American far right conservatism must either compromise with Trump, penalize Trump and Palin by backing a moderate candidate, or sitting out the election.
To JakeStarkey: You failed to mention the best option. Do not vote for a president.
QUOTE="Flanders, post: 13304652, member: 25144"]p.s. Tea Partiers are back to square one. Concentrate on electing conservatives to Congress so they are strong enough to shove the rigid rod of reality right up the rear end of the sewer rat’s replacement should he or she be a clone.[/QUOTE]
She hasn't left her conservative values but thinks he is the one that can get things done.
To Iceweasel: Trump’s long list of negatives can be excused if he changes his tune. But this alone disputes Sarah’s switch:

I’m sensing an undercurrent that says some big name establishment Republicans are threatening to leave the party if Donald Trump gets the nomination. The threat is horseshit. Trump billing himself as a negotiator is fine if it ended at negotiating with foreign governments, but it also means bipartisan legislation which is exactly how Republicans and Democrats have been screwing Americans since the LBJ years. Democrats love bipartisan negotiations because they never once compromised entre nous on their Socialist agenda.​

NOTE: I do not know how it is in Trump’s business negotiations, but should he get the nomination he better understand that Democrats negotiate incrementally. Anything Democrats agree to moves their agenda forward one baby step at a time. Example:​

XXXXX

Question: When did the negotiations take place for the Affordable Care Act? Answer: Democrats began negotiating after the pubic found out what was in it.

Establishment Republicans would leave the party a lot faster if Ted Cruz gets the nomination. They fear Cruz will negotiate the same way Democrats negotiate —— It’s our way or nothing. Bottom line: Karl Rove’s Republicans and Democrats can live with Trump, but they will not live with Ted Cruz.​


Here is another take on Palin that might give you second thoughts about defending her infidelity:

This year, it appears we have Colin Powell II, the Palining. In a country of overabundant sequels, this is one we could do without. In this edition, instead of a pillar of the Republican Party endorsing perhaps the most radical-left major party nominee ever, we have a major figure of the Tea Party throwing support behind the candidate perhaps least concerned with the Constitution or limited government of any major GOP contender.​

January 20, 2016
Sarah Palin goes full Colin Powell on the Tea Party
By Joseph Ashby

Blog: Sarah Palin goes full Colin Powell on the Tea Party
I am a moderate Republican who now sees a strong possibility for a Kasich Rubio ticket at a brokered convention.
To JakeStarkey: Yeah, right —— but only if moderate Republican means flaming liberal. You cannot have Hillary Clinton, or Bernie Sanders, so you are trying to plug Kasich and Rubio among USMB conservatives.
Who was the last POTUS to adequately reflect your values?
To IcebergSlim: Thomas Jefferson
 
Flanders you can define me as blue if you want.

The fact is that we in the moderate GOP will not let Cruz be the nominee, and we will do our best to co-opt Trump (he likes deals) if we cannot prevent his nomination. That would be much easier than co-opting Cruz, because Trump's ideals are negotiable.
 
American far right conservatism must either compromise with Trump, penalize Trump and Palin by backing a moderate candidate, or sitting out the election.
To JakeStarkey: You failed to mention the best option. Do not vote for a president.
QUOTE="Flanders, post: 13304652, member: 25144"]p.s. Tea Partiers are back to square one. Concentrate on electing conservatives to Congress so they are strong enough to shove the rigid rod of reality right up the rear end of the sewer rat’s replacement should he or she be a clone.
She hasn't left her conservative values but thinks he is the one that can get things done.
To Iceweasel: Trump’s long list of negatives can be excused if he changes his tune. But this alone disputes Sarah’s switch:

I’m sensing an undercurrent that says some big name establishment Republicans are threatening to leave the party if Donald Trump gets the nomination. The threat is horseshit. Trump billing himself as a negotiator is fine if it ended at negotiating with foreign governments, but it also means bipartisan legislation which is exactly how Republicans and Democrats have been screwing Americans since the LBJ years. Democrats love bipartisan negotiations because they never once compromised entre nous on their Socialist agenda.​

NOTE: I do not know how it is in Trump’s business negotiations, but should he get the nomination he better understand that Democrats negotiate incrementally. Anything Democrats agree to moves their agenda forward one baby step at a time. Example:​

XXXXX

Question: When did the negotiations take place for the Affordable Care Act? Answer: Democrats began negotiating after the pubic found out what was in it.

Establishment Republicans would leave the party a lot faster if Ted Cruz gets the nomination. They fear Cruz will negotiate the same way Democrats negotiate —— It’s our way or nothing. Bottom line: Karl Rove’s Republicans and Democrats can live with Trump, but they will not live with Ted Cruz.​


Here is another take on Palin that might give you second thoughts about defending her infidelity:

This year, it appears we have Colin Powell II, the Palining. In a country of overabundant sequels, this is one we could do without. In this edition, instead of a pillar of the Republican Party endorsing perhaps the most radical-left major party nominee ever, we have a major figure of the Tea Party throwing support behind the candidate perhaps least concerned with the Constitution or limited government of any major GOP contender.​

January 20, 2016
Sarah Palin goes full Colin Powell on the Tea Party
By Joseph Ashby

Blog: Sarah Palin goes full Colin Powell on the Tea Party
I am a moderate Republican who now sees a strong possibility for a Kasich Rubio ticket at a brokered convention.
To JakeStarkey: Yeah, right —— but only if moderate Republican means flaming liberal. You cannot have Hillary Clinton, or Bernie Sanders, so you are trying to plug Kasich and Rubio among USMB conservatives.
Who was the last POTUS to adequately reflect your values?
To IcebergSlim: Thomas Jefferson[/QUOTE]


Another jewel in the Scrub Legacy........wiping out 200 years of US history...
 
To Iceweasel: Trump’s long list of negatives can be excused if he changes his tune. But this alone disputes Sarah’s switch:

I’m sensing an undercurrent that says some big name establishment Republicans are threatening to leave the party if Donald Trump gets the nomination. The threat is horseshit. Trump billing himself as a negotiator is fine if it ended at negotiating with foreign governments, but it also means bipartisan legislation which is exactly how Republicans and Democrats have been screwing Americans since the LBJ years. Democrats love bipartisan negotiations because they never once compromised entre nous on their Socialist agenda.​

NOTE: I do not know how it is in Trump’s business negotiations, but should he get the nomination he better understand that Democrats negotiate incrementally. Anything Democrats agree to moves their agenda forward one baby step at a time. Example:​

XXXXX

Question: When did the negotiations take place for the Affordable Care Act? Answer: Democrats began negotiating after the pubic found out what was in it.

Establishment Republicans would leave the party a lot faster if Ted Cruz gets the nomination. They fear Cruz will negotiate the same way Democrats negotiate —— It’s our way or nothing. Bottom line: Karl Rove’s Republicans and Democrats can live with Trump, but they will not live with Ted Cruz.​


Here is another take on Palin that might give you second thoughts about defending her infidelity:

This year, it appears we have Colin Powell II, the Palining. In a country of overabundant sequels, this is one we could do without. In this edition, instead of a pillar of the Republican Party endorsing perhaps the most radical-left major party nominee ever, we have a major figure of the Tea Party throwing support behind the candidate perhaps least concerned with the Constitution or limited government of any major GOP contender.​
Op-ed hit pieces are good enough for you? LOL.
 
Flanders, you can define me as a communist if you wish.

We don't let the shitty philosophy of ideologues like you define the GOP.
 
To Iceweasel: Trump’s long list of negatives can be excused if he changes his tune. But this alone disputes Sarah’s switch:

I’m sensing an undercurrent that says some big name establishment Republicans are threatening to leave the party if Donald Trump gets the nomination. The threat is horseshit. Trump billing himself as a negotiator is fine if it ended at negotiating with foreign governments, but it also means bipartisan legislation which is exactly how Republicans and Democrats have been screwing Americans since the LBJ years. Democrats love bipartisan negotiations because they never once compromised entre nous on their Socialist agenda.​

NOTE: I do not know how it is in Trump’s business negotiations, but should he get the nomination he better understand that Democrats negotiate incrementally. Anything Democrats agree to moves their agenda forward one baby step at a time. Example:​

XXXXX

Question: When did the negotiations take place for the Affordable Care Act? Answer: Democrats began negotiating after the pubic found out what was in it.

Establishment Republicans would leave the party a lot faster if Ted Cruz gets the nomination. They fear Cruz will negotiate the same way Democrats negotiate —— It’s our way or nothing. Bottom line: Karl Rove’s Republicans and Democrats can live with Trump, but they will not live with Ted Cruz.​


Here is another take on Palin that might give you second thoughts about defending her infidelity:

This year, it appears we have Colin Powell II, the Palining. In a country of overabundant sequels, this is one we could do without. In this edition, instead of a pillar of the Republican Party endorsing perhaps the most radical-left major party nominee ever, we have a major figure of the Tea Party throwing support behind the candidate perhaps least concerned with the Constitution or limited government of any major GOP contender.​
Op-ed hit pieces are good enough for you? LOL.

Uh....those are from the OP....

You've never been all that sharp, have you...
 
To Iceweasel: Trump’s long list of negatives can be excused if he changes his tune. But this alone disputes Sarah’s switch:

I’m sensing an undercurrent that says some big name establishment Republicans are threatening to leave the party if Donald Trump gets the nomination. The threat is horseshit. Trump billing himself as a negotiator is fine if it ended at negotiating with foreign governments, but it also means bipartisan legislation which is exactly how Republicans and Democrats have been screwing Americans since the LBJ years. Democrats love bipartisan negotiations because they never once compromised entre nous on their Socialist agenda.​

NOTE: I do not know how it is in Trump’s business negotiations, but should he get the nomination he better understand that Democrats negotiate incrementally. Anything Democrats agree to moves their agenda forward one baby step at a time. Example:​

XXXXX

Question: When did the negotiations take place for the Affordable Care Act? Answer: Democrats began negotiating after the pubic found out what was in it.

Establishment Republicans would leave the party a lot faster if Ted Cruz gets the nomination. They fear Cruz will negotiate the same way Democrats negotiate —— It’s our way or nothing. Bottom line: Karl Rove’s Republicans and Democrats can live with Trump, but they will not live with Ted Cruz.​


Here is another take on Palin that might give you second thoughts about defending her infidelity:

This year, it appears we have Colin Powell II, the Palining. In a country of overabundant sequels, this is one we could do without. In this edition, instead of a pillar of the Republican Party endorsing perhaps the most radical-left major party nominee ever, we have a major figure of the Tea Party throwing support behind the candidate perhaps least concerned with the Constitution or limited government of any major GOP contender.​
Op-ed hit pieces are good enough for you? LOL.

Uh....those are from the OP....

You've never been all that sharp, have you...
Learn to quote, Einstein.
 
To Iceweasel: Trump’s long list of negatives can be excused if he changes his tune. But this alone disputes Sarah’s switch:

I’m sensing an undercurrent that says some big name establishment Republicans are threatening to leave the party if Donald Trump gets the nomination. The threat is horseshit. Trump billing himself as a negotiator is fine if it ended at negotiating with foreign governments, but it also means bipartisan legislation which is exactly how Republicans and Democrats have been screwing Americans since the LBJ years. Democrats love bipartisan negotiations because they never once compromised entre nous on their Socialist agenda.​

NOTE: I do not know how it is in Trump’s business negotiations, but should he get the nomination he better understand that Democrats negotiate incrementally. Anything Democrats agree to moves their agenda forward one baby step at a time. Example:​

XXXXX

Question: When did the negotiations take place for the Affordable Care Act? Answer: Democrats began negotiating after the pubic found out what was in it.

Establishment Republicans would leave the party a lot faster if Ted Cruz gets the nomination. They fear Cruz will negotiate the same way Democrats negotiate —— It’s our way or nothing. Bottom line: Karl Rove’s Republicans and Democrats can live with Trump, but they will not live with Ted Cruz.​


Here is another take on Palin that might give you second thoughts about defending her infidelity:

This year, it appears we have Colin Powell II, the Palining. In a country of overabundant sequels, this is one we could do without. In this edition, instead of a pillar of the Republican Party endorsing perhaps the most radical-left major party nominee ever, we have a major figure of the Tea Party throwing support behind the candidate perhaps least concerned with the Constitution or limited government of any major GOP contender.​
Op-ed hit pieces are good enough for you? LOL.

Uh....those are from the OP....

You've never been all that sharp, have you...
Learn to quote, Einstein.

These Android pads frequently go rogue......but the [/quote] thingy at the end was rather unambiguous.

You didn't pick up on the similarity to the opening post?
 
If you listened to her endorsement you would understand why she's on board with Trump. She hasn't left her conservative values but thinks he is the one that can get things done.
Like she thought she could ...Sorry history tell us that they are a PAIR OF LOONEYS
 
The assessment recognizes reality.

Trump is not a conservative.

Palin has betrayed conservatism.

Cruz's path to the presidency has been dealt probably a mortal blow.

American far right conservatism must either compromise with Trump, penalize Trump and Palin by backing a moderate candidate, or sitting out the election.

Palin has a history of disregarding actual political positions in her endorsements.
Like most Political Whores
 
If you listened to her endorsement you would understand why she's on board with Trump. She hasn't left her conservative values but thinks he is the one that can get things done.
Like she thought she could ...Sorry history tell us that they are a PAIR OF LOONEYS
You are in no position to speak for history. Liberals think too much of themselves.
 
If you listened to her endorsement you would understand why she's on board with Trump. She hasn't left her conservative values but thinks he is the one that can get things done.
Like she thought she could ...Sorry history tell us that they are a PAIR OF LOONEYS
You are in no position to speak for history. Liberals think too much of themselves.
But I'm right of course..........I predicted way before he was endorsed as the Democratic Leader,that Barak Obama would be President....you should have heard the Lemmings on here abuse me....I was correct......Then I said he would shoo-in for a second term......O how the Lemmings wept.....I was correct yet again.......When I predicted that Palin had a snowballs chance in hell of becoming the Vice President,how the Lemmings howled...I was right again.....I can predict you Americans,well the Republikans,like you anyway.........Get a grip of yourself and get a life.
 
If you listened to her endorsement you would understand why she's on board with Trump. She hasn't left her conservative values but thinks he is the one that can get things done.
Like she thought she could ...Sorry history tell us that they are a PAIR OF LOONEYS
You are in no position to speak for history. Liberals think too much of themselves.
But I'm right of course..........I predicted way before he was endorsed as the Democratic Leader,that Barak Obama would be President....you should have heard the Lemmings on here abuse me....I was correct......Then I said he would shoo-in for a second term......O how the Lemmings wept.....I was correct yet again.......When I predicted that Palin had a snowballs chance in hell of becoming the Vice President,how the Lemmings howled...I was right again.....I can predict you Americans,well the Republikans,like you anyway.........Get a grip of yourself and get a life.
obama isn't a Republican but you're full of shit. Like I said, liberals think too highly of themselves, thanks for proving it.
 
If you listened to her endorsement you would understand why she's on board with Trump. She hasn't left her conservative values but thinks he is the one that can get things done.
Like she thought she could ...Sorry history tell us that they are a PAIR OF LOONEYS
You are in no position to speak for history. Liberals think too much of themselves.
But I'm right of course..........I predicted way before he was endorsed as the Democratic Leader,that Barak Obama would be President....you should have heard the Lemmings on here abuse me....I was correct......Then I said he would shoo-in for a second term......O how the Lemmings wept.....I was correct yet again.......When I predicted that Palin had a snowballs chance in hell of becoming the Vice President,how the Lemmings howled...I was right again.....I can predict you Americans,well the Republikans,like you anyway.........Get a grip of yourself and get a life.
obama isn't a Republican but you're full of shit. Like I said, liberals think too highly of themselves, thanks for proving it.
Are you mental?????!!!!!!!!! I never said Mr Obama was a Republikan,you must be Myopic............If I'm full of shit,then you are a Sewer absorbing Republikan SHIT......MUNCH ON.LOL
 
If you listened to her endorsement you would understand why she's on board with Trump. She hasn't left her conservative values but thinks he is the one that can get things done.
Like she thought she could ...Sorry history tell us that they are a PAIR OF LOONEYS
You are in no position to speak for history. Liberals think too much of themselves.
But I'm right of course..........I predicted way before he was endorsed as the Democratic Leader,that Barak Obama would be President....you should have heard the Lemmings on here abuse me....I was correct......Then I said he would shoo-in for a second term......O how the Lemmings wept.....I was correct yet again.......When I predicted that Palin had a snowballs chance in hell of becoming the Vice President,how the Lemmings howled...I was right again.....I can predict you Americans,well the Republikans,like you anyway.........Get a grip of yourself and get a life.
obama isn't a Republican but you're full of shit. Like I said, liberals think too highly of themselves, thanks for proving it.
Are you mental?????!!!!!!!!! I never said Mr Obama was a Republikan,you must be Myopic............If I'm full of shit,then you are a Sewer absorbing Republikan SHIT......MUNCH ON.LOL
You rattled off your credentials for accurate fortune telling of the "Republikans" and used obama as evidence. Don't blame me for your slothful wit.
 
Like she thought she could ...Sorry history tell us that they are a PAIR OF LOONEYS
You are in no position to speak for history. Liberals think too much of themselves.
But I'm right of course..........I predicted way before he was endorsed as the Democratic Leader,that Barak Obama would be President....you should have heard the Lemmings on here abuse me....I was correct......Then I said he would shoo-in for a second term......O how the Lemmings wept.....I was correct yet again.......When I predicted that Palin had a snowballs chance in hell of becoming the Vice President,how the Lemmings howled...I was right again.....I can predict you Americans,well the Republikans,like you anyway.........Get a grip of yourself and get a life.
obama isn't a Republican but you're full of shit. Like I said, liberals think too highly of themselves, thanks for proving it.
Are you mental?????!!!!!!!!! I never said Mr Obama was a Republikan,you must be Myopic............If I'm full of shit,then you are a Sewer absorbing Republikan SHIT......MUNCH ON.LOL
You rattled off your credentials for accurate fortune telling of the "Republikans" and used obama as evidence. Don't blame me for your slothful wit.
The trouble between you and I is.....I have a normally functioning Brain............Keep Munching Pal,it suits Bigtime
 
You are in no position to speak for history. Liberals think too much of themselves.
But I'm right of course..........I predicted way before he was endorsed as the Democratic Leader,that Barak Obama would be President....you should have heard the Lemmings on here abuse me....I was correct......Then I said he would shoo-in for a second term......O how the Lemmings wept.....I was correct yet again.......When I predicted that Palin had a snowballs chance in hell of becoming the Vice President,how the Lemmings howled...I was right again.....I can predict you Americans,well the Republikans,like you anyway.........Get a grip of yourself and get a life.
obama isn't a Republican but you're full of shit. Like I said, liberals think too highly of themselves, thanks for proving it.
Are you mental?????!!!!!!!!! I never said Mr Obama was a Republikan,you must be Myopic............If I'm full of shit,then you are a Sewer absorbing Republikan SHIT......MUNCH ON.LOL
You rattled off your credentials for accurate fortune telling of the "Republikans" and used obama as evidence. Don't blame me for your slothful wit.
The trouble between you and I is.....I have a normally functioning Brain............Keep Munching Pal,it suits Bigtime
You spell like a little girl.
 
That Sarah hopped in bed with Donald Trump is the unkindest cut of all.
You are known by the company you keep. Sarah may not know it, but she is now keeping company with Mitch McConnell:

January 21, 2016
Is Trump a McConnell-Rove Establishment Tool?
By Daren Jonescu


Articles: Is Trump a McConnell-Rove Establishment Tool?

XXXXX

January 21, 2016
Trump Goes Full McConnell on Cruz
By C. Edmund Wright


Articles: Trump Goes Full McConnell on Cruz

This is the Sarah I knew and loved:

. . . Sarah Palin, who told Sean Hannity tonight that she thought Sen. Mitch McConnell‘s plan “makes no sense” and that now, more than ever, “we have to reload. We will not capitulate.”​

Palin argued that much of the debt problem was due to the direction that President Obama had taken the country, away from “a strong foundation of reward for work ethic and development of natural resources.” Now that the mess had been made, however, Palin argued that compromising too much on conservative principles would be dangerous. “We cannot default, but we cannot afford to retreat– we have to reload,” she told Hannity, then going after the McConnell plan. “That plan of McConnell’s makes no sense because it cedes power to Obama,” she argued. To Palin, giving President Obama more power is particularly dangerous because “we cannot trust him to further manipulate our economy.”​

Sarah Palin: McConnell Plan ‘Makes No Sense,’ Hands Obama Budget With ‘White Flag’
by Frances Martel | 9:31 pm, July 13th, 2011

Sarah Palin: McConnell Plan ‘Makes No Sense,’ Hands Obama Budget With ‘White Flag’

Incidentally, another establishment Republican loser chimes in for Trump:

January 21, 2016
Bob Dole warns against Cruz, says Trump would do better
By Thomas Lifson

Blog: Bob Dole warns against Cruz, says Trump would do better

Let me remind you that Newt Gingrich called Dole a tax collector for the welfare state.
 
We don't let the shitty philosophy of ideologues like you define the GOP.
To JakeStarkey: Define WE!

I do not give a rat’s ass how the GOP is defined by lefties, or defined by establishment Republicans for that matter. I define it for myself, and for anybody who agrees with me. Here are a few items your favorite Republican defines for assholes:


common-core-protest-AP-420x315.jpg
http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/05/common-core-protest-AP-420x315.jpg
A former marketing executive for textbook publishing giant Pearson Education reveals the anti-American agenda behind Common Core and the Advanced Placement U.S. History framework in the third video of a series produced by Project Veritas and focused on the corporate cronyism behind the education reform known as Common Core.

Exclusive: Former Pearson Exec Reveals Anti-American Agenda in Common Core
by Dr. Susan Berry21 Jan 2016

Exclusive: Former Pearson Exec Reveals Anti-American Agenda in Common Core - Breitbart

Worse than Common Core and citizenship for illegal aliens, your choice for president wants to make policy based on his personal moral code. Americans vote for presidents not popes. Dictating everyone's behavior is exactly how every dirty little moralist make decisions. The crime is that scum bags like Kasich require tax dollars to force everybody to do as they are told.

 

Forum List

Back
Top