Exactly
so to what you said in post no 3.....
No. If he is enough of a danger to have weapons seized, he is enough of a danger to be confined.
I say include a Drug Screening with every 4473 Form ( than includes testing for SSRIs )
I wouldn't be opposed to that. It would catch mentally ill people on anti-psychotics and similar drugs.
Who get cover from HIPPA Laws and Far Left & Left MSM & AGs
It is not a disqualification to take medication. You two are high.
It is if they were prescribed by both your Psychologist and Shrink during one of your judge ordered weekly visits
One gets those meds with OUT a judge's order dumbass. just taking meds is not a disqualification to owning firearms
SSRIs are what Adam Lanza was on and the Nutjob who shot Chris Kyle ( Along with over half the High Profile shooters of the last 25 years )
Judge orders you to see shrink or Psychologist or both ( they prescribe meds )
No judges do not order most people to see shrinks I never had a judge order me to do so nor did any of the hundreds of people being seen at the office I go too
S0 what people take aspirin and shoot places up gonna say they are disqualified too?
Second 51/50 in Ca. Makes it mandatory
again dumb ass the vast majority of people seeing shrinks and taking medication are not being ordered to by a judge.
And a vast Majority of the High Profile Shooters in last 25 years were on SSRIs
so what?
These people don't give a damn about gun crime victims. If they did, they'd be screaming 24/7 about the holocaust in the inner cities. They'd CHEERFULLY welcome the deaths of a hundreds of thousands of Americans who would resist confiscation. They'd say it was for the "greater good". All I can say is when they decide to come to the door to collect, it's going to be a REALLY bad time to be a cop.
