Connecticut Judge Throws Out Election Results and Orders New Primary After “Shocking” Evidence of Democrat Ballot Fraud

[Faun]

View attachment 852105


Eat on this you cottage cheesed brain-dead anti-American POS. Even USPS caught making multiple trips to a drop box.....with load after load of bogus ballots you sack of human feces.
View attachment 852106

With ballots they collected on their route?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

In the Ct case, they didn't have time to destroy the evidence. By the time audits of the 2020 election were done, the machines had been emptied, the mail in ballots were separated from their signed envelopes and much of the video had been destroyed. So we'll never know how much fraud there might have been.

the ballots are separated from their signed envelopes before they are counted on election night. So, yes of course this took place before an audit could happen.

 

[Foxfyre]

the ballots are separated from their signed envelopes before they are counted on election night. So, yes of course this took place before an audit could happen.

And there is no way to determine if it is a valid ballot or not once it has been separated from its original envelope. That isn't rocket science. It's a fact.

 

[Faun]

And there is no way to determine if it is a valid ballot or not once it has been separated from its original envelope. That isn't rocket science. It's a fact.

Nonsense.

By the time a ballot is separated from the envelope, it is validated.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

And there is no way to determine if it is a valid ballot or not once it has been separated from its original envelope.

Which is why the determination is made prior to the separation takes place

To do it any other way would be to remove the privacy of whom a person voted for

 

[leftwinger]

No one ever showed accounting….envelope Qty. matches mail in ballots QTY etc. Even in Maricopa.
We know they didn’t check signatures in AZ, its on film. As fast as the image would load, next.


GA had unfolded mail in ballots. Judge blocked any look. Gave them 2yrs to go create folds Just in case.

With ballots they collected on their route?

Envelope is not addressed to a random drop box you ignorant sack of cow guts.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Another vote fraud. This judge allowed discovery and now has ordered a new primary.

Yet loony Jack Smith in his fraudulent J6 indictment propounds that fighting a result of any vote is a violation of Federal law and would if accepted by SCOTUS, criminalize every disagreement to overturn any election at any level since the statute he's [mis]using against Trump is aimed at any election owing to the 14th Amendment.

​

In Bridgeport, Connecticut, State Judge William Clark has thrown out the results of the September Democrat primary election and ordered a new primary to be scheduled and conducted [Court Order Here]. The issue was ballot harvesting and ballot fraud – both violations of state law.​

​

The Judge reviewed CCTV footage showing Wanda Geter-Pataky, vice chair of the Bridgeport Democratic Town Committee and operations specialist for the city, and Eneida Martinez, a former City Council member, working to support the party approved candidate. Both Ms Geter-Pataky and Ms Martinez participated in absentee ballot fraud, ballot harvesting and ballot stuffing at drop boxes. Both women invoked the Fifth Amendment when confronted as witnesses by the judge.​

​

A judge ruled on Wednesday to overturn the city’s Democratic primary election, initially won by incumbent Mayor Joe Ganim, following claims of absentee ballot fraud by his opponent, John Gomes.​

​

After two weeks of evidentiary hearings for Gomes’s absentee ballot fraud lawsuit, Judge William Clark ordered a new Democratic primary based on 180 pieces of evidence presented by Gomes’s legal counsel.​

​

In the 37-page ruling, Clark said the video footage presented by Bill Bloss – Gomes’s attorney – was particularly alarming.​

“Mr. Ganim was also correct to be ‘shocked’ at what he saw on the video clips in evidence that were shown to him while he was on the witness stand,” Clark wrote. “The videos are shocking to the court and should be shocking to all the parties.​

​

Ganin was one the many city officials called to the Fairfield Judicial District Superior Courthouse for questioning, along with Wanda Geter-Pataky, vice chair of the Bridgeport Democratic Town Committee and operations specialist for the city, and Eneida Martinez, a former City Council member accused by Gomes of stuffing ballot dropboxes.​

​

At the witness stand, Ganim told the court he was “shocked” by an 18-minute video – subpoenaed by Gomes from Bridgeport police – that appeared to show 12 instances of Geter-Pataky either depositing stacks of ballots herself or handing ballots to others from behind her reception desk, and four instances of Martinez dropping off ballots.​

​

Asked about the footage during the hearings, both Geter-Pataky and Martinez asserted their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination . Ganim, who appeared to win the primary by 250 votes after a count of absentee ballots, denied any involvement in the alleged fraud. (read more)​

Connecticut Judge Throws Out Election Results and Orders New Primary After "Shocking" Evidence of Democrat Ballot Fraud - The Last Refuge

In Bridgeport, Connecticut, State Judge William Clark has thrown out the results of the September Democrat primary election and ordered a new primary to be scheduled and conducted [Court Order Here]. The issue was ballot harvesting and ballot fraud – both violations of state law. The Judge...

theconservativetreehouse.com

Massive voter fraud is the only thing keeping NY and CA "voting" democrat

 

[leftwinger]

Which is why the determination is made prior to the separation takes place

To do it any other way would be to remove the privacy of whom a person voted for

they didnt chack signatures accurately in any State (if at all) and you know it you troublemaking POS. Enjoy your camp behind razor wire you sick SOB. You’re nothing but a closeted trolling phony like Mac and your pusee boys.

 

[Faun]

No one ever showed accounting….envelope Qty. matches mail in ballots QTY etc. Even in Maricopa.
We know they didn’t check signatures in AZ, its on film. As fast as the image would load, next.


GA had unfolded mail in ballots. Judge blocked any look. Gave them 2yrs to go create folds Just in case.

Envelope is not addressed to a random drop box you ignorant sack of cow guts.

So? The USPC warned in some areas, due to increased volume of mail-in ballots, along with cuts made to some offices, they couldn't guarantee ballots could be handled in a timely fashion. Depositing them in a drop box evaporates that risk. You've not shown some letter carriers were not allowed to do that. Nor did you show any letter carriers were charged with a crime for doing that. No amount of name calling will salvage your failure to prove their actions were criminal.

 

[leftwinger]

Our votes were stolen. Votes are preciuos as paper money. A Bank doesn’t get away saying trust us.

every ballot from Purchase Order to incoming to outgoing to received to counted to archived must be 1:1 traceable just like a bank audit. These clowns can’t even say how may provisional ballots on-hand minus how many used adds up!!! Country’s run like a flea market.

 

[leftwinger]

So? The USPC warned in some areas, due to increased volume of mail-in ballots, along with cuts made to some offices, they couldn't guarantee ballots could be handled in a timely fashion. Depositing them in a drop box evaporates that risk. You've not shown some letter carriers were not allowed to do that. Nor did you show any letter carriers were charged with a crime for doing that. No amount of name calling will salvage your failure to prove their actions were criminal.

They don’t separate out mail picked up from USPS boxes then willy-nilly roam around off route on their own to look for a drop box. They take them to be scanned/sorted at an approved station then delivered in batches to Election counting rooms you giant spinning clown.

 

[Faun]

They don’t separate out mail picked up from USPS boxes then willy-nilly roam around off route on their own to look for a drop box. They take them to be scanned/sorted at an approved station then delivered in batches to Election counting rooms you giant spinning clown.

You really should be more respectful towards your betters. Especially when you're just making shit up that sounds good in your head even though you really expose your own ignorance.

Yes, they can legally deposit ballots they collect into official drop boxes...

https://www.michigan.gov/sos/faqs/elections-and-campaign-finance/fact-checks

Where a U.S. Postal Service employee is shown possibly putting absentee ballot applications or ballots into a drop box, this is a normal and legal activity, as USPS workers are required to expedite the return of election mail either by delivery to the clerk’s office or drop box.​

 

[Foxfyre]

Nonsense.

By the time a ballot is separated from the envelope, it is validated.

Okay genius. You tell me how you determine a valid from a bogus ballot once it is separated from its envelope.

 

[Faun]

Okay genius. You tell me how you determine a valid from a bogus ballot once it is separated from its envelope.

It's validated by determination the ballot was submitted by the proper registered voters. Then placed among all the validated ballots to be counted.

Ballots deemed invalid are then cured to ensure they are invalid. If they are still deemed to be invalid after attempting to cure them, they are kept separate from validated ballots.

This is how it's done in every election since absentee ballots have been avaliable.

 

[Foxfyre]

It's validated by determination the ballot was submitted by the proper registered voter.

Unless the intention is to cheat in which case no validation is done.

 

[Faun]

Unless the intention is to cheat in which case no validation is done.

Nope. Cheating requires multiple people at different levels. For example, there was one person tasked with validating signatures who was observed by others not doing his due diligence and just flipping through them. Not necessarily cheating, though it could have been, but either way, not validating signatures. He was removed from that position.

There was no widespread fraud in that election. Trump was knowingly lying and his TDS base swallowed it all. You should know this because prior to the election, a former advisor of his said Trump was going to insist he won if he lost and claim the election was stolen. Followed up with Trump paying nearly $1½ million to two independent research firms to find election fraud and neither one affirmed any of Trump's lies. Trump never told anyone about that but instead, kept lying about election fraud stealing the election from him.

 

[Foxfyre]

Nope. Cheating requires multiple people at different levels. For example, there was one person tasked with validating signatures who was observed by others not doing his due diligence and just flipping through them. Not necessarily cheating, though it could have been, but either way, not validating signatures. He was removed from that position.

There was no widespread fraud in that election. Trump was knowingly lying and his TDS base swallowed it all. You should know this because prior to the election, a former advisor of his said Trump was going to insist he won if he lost and claim the election was stolen. Followed up with Trump paying nearly $1½ million to two independent research firms to find election fraud and neither one affirmed any of Trump's lies. Trump never told anyone about that but instead, kept lying about election fraud stealing the election from him.

There is no way to know whether a mail in ballot that has been separated from its signed envelope is a valid or bogus ballot.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Democrat cheating is rampant. Finally an honest judge got a case

 

[Faun]

There is no way to know whether a mail in ballot that has been separated from its signed envelope is a valid or bogus ballot.

That's utter bullshit. Again, it's validated before it's separated. If what you blindly claim were true, there could never have been absentee ballots in any election.

 

[Foxfyre]

That's utter bullshit. Again, it's validated before it's separated. If what you blindly claim were true, there could never have been absentee ballots in any election.

Again genius prove it. Show me how in an audit of an election, anybody can guarantee that a ballot was authenticated/validated by anybody. Most especially when the poll watcher were locked out of the room when the ballot is claimed to have been validated?