Congressional committees uncover a Trump skeleton ..

29 years ago well it's not the almost 50 years the left went back to in 2012 to find something on Mitt Romney when he was in prep school but the day is still young.


and right before the election it was discovered he was hiding big bucks offshore and cost him an election ...
Sure sure whatever you say.
 
If he paid the fine and there is nothing showing he personally did anything wrong this isn't much of anything.

And aren't most skeletons not a matter or public record?
 
29 years ago well it's not the almost 50 years the left went back to in 2012 to find something on Mitt Romney when he was in prep school but the day is still young.


and right before the election it was discovered he was hiding big bucks offshore and cost him an election ...
Sure sure whatever you say.

well, in that case I say youre an idiot too.

For all Mitt Romney’s touting of his business record, when it comes to his own money the Republican nominee is remarkably shy about disclosing numbers and investments. Nicholas Shaxson delves into the murky world of offshore finance, revealing loopholes that allow the very wealthy to skirt tax laws, and investigating just how much of Romney’s fortune (with $30 million in Bain Capital funds in the Cayman Islands alone?) looks pretty strange for a presidential candidate.
 
If he paid the fine and there is nothing showing he personally did anything wrong this isn't much of anything.

And aren't most skeletons not a matter or public record?


who said anything about wrong doing?


damn everyone of you RW idgets just make shit up as fast as you can dont you
 
It's a bit of forgotten history that's buried in federal records held by an investigative unit of the Treasury Department, records that congressional committees investigating Trump's ties to Russia have obtained access to, CNN has learned.

The casino repeatedly failed to properly report gamblers who cashed out $10,000 or more in a single day, the government said.


Trump's casino ended up paying the Treasury Department a $477,000 fine in 1998 without admitting any liability under the Bank Secrecy Act.

money laundering huh Don Cheeto ?

bout time to subpoena those tax returns and follow the MONEY !
^^^^^

tenor.gif
 
Btw what does this have to do with Russia?

Did it occur to you that if they are searching 1998 tax records it's unlikely that they are looking for evidence of Russian collusion?
 
Did he pay his fine? Then why are you bringing up 20 year old stories,
Why did Trump bring accusers of Bill Clinton from more than 20 years ago to the debate?
 
29 years ago well it's not the almost 50 years the left went back to in 2012 to find something on Mitt Romney when he was in prep school but the day is still young.


and right before the election it was discovered he was hiding big bucks offshore and cost him an election ...
Sure sure whatever you say.

well, in that case I say youre an idiot too.

For all Mitt Romney’s touting of his business record, when it comes to his own money the Republican nominee is remarkably shy about disclosing numbers and investments. Nicholas Shaxson delves into the murky world of offshore finance, revealing loopholes that allow the very wealthy to skirt tax laws, and investigating just how much of Romney’s fortune (with $30 million in Bain Capital funds in the Cayman Islands alone?) looks pretty strange for a presidential candidate.
Yeah moron keeping money in offshore accounts usually for tax purposes is both legal and fairly common especially for the rich. Now do everyone a favor and pull your lower lip over your head and swallow.
 
Btw what does this have to do with Russia?

Did it occur to you that if they are searching 1998 tax records it's unlikely that they are looking for evidence of Russian collusion?

The third prong of the investigation is financial crimes.
 
If he paid the fine and there is nothing showing he personally did anything wrong this isn't much of anything.

And aren't most skeletons not a matter or public record?


who said anything about wrong doing?


damn everyone of you RW idgets just make shit up as fast as you can dont you

What exactly do you think a skeleton in the closet is?
 
Btw what does this have to do with Russia?

Did it occur to you that if they are searching 1998 tax records it's unlikely that they are looking for evidence of Russian collusion?

The third prong of the investigation is financial crimes.

Which has what to do with Russian collusion?
 
Btw what does this have to do with Russia?

Did it occur to you that if they are searching 1998 tax records it's unlikely that they are looking for evidence of Russian collusion?

The third prong of the investigation is financial crimes.

Which has what to do with Russian collusion?


no one knows yet, the investigation is ongoing ...


how ******* dumb are RWs anyway?
How is asking questions dumb?
 
Siete simply spazzes out when cornered.... he and his have nothing.
 
Btw what does this have to do with Russia?

Did it occur to you that if they are searching 1998 tax records it's unlikely that they are looking for evidence of Russian collusion?

The third prong of the investigation is financial crimes.

Which has what to do with Russian collusion?


no one knows yet, the investigation is ongoing ...


how ******* dumb are RWs anyway?
How is asking questions dumb?


what part of 3 prong investigatoion confuses you ?


leaking "no documented evidence" ***** Dex up so bad he blames it on other people.
 
15th post
HALF A MILLION DOLLAR FINE IN 98 .. paid no questions asked,

may lead to to big shit now ..


An issue settled 19 years ago is irrelevant to today. It's just that simple.


.
 
Btw what does this have to do with Russia?

Did it occur to you that if they are searching 1998 tax records it's unlikely that they are looking for evidence of Russian collusion?

The third prong of the investigation is financial crimes.

Which has what to do with Russian collusion?


no one knows yet, the investigation is ongoing ...


how ******* dumb are RWs anyway?
How is asking questions dumb?


what part of 3 prong investigatoion confuses you ?


leaking "no documented evidence" ***** Dex up so bad he blames it on other people.

How does investigating possible financial crimes well beyond the statute of limitations have any relevance to an investigation into Russia or obstruction of justice?

If they have to go back that far to find anything doesn't that indicate there isn't anything more recently?

I know you are all for a fishing expedition but some of us would like reason to guide investigations
 
Btw what does this have to do with Russia?

Did it occur to you that if they are searching 1998 tax records it's unlikely that they are looking for evidence of Russian collusion?

The third prong of the investigation is financial crimes.

Based on what? Is this an investigation for something alleged based on evidence or just throwing shit against the wall and seeing if something might stick?
 
Btw what does this have to do with Russia?

Did it occur to you that if they are searching 1998 tax records it's unlikely that they are looking for evidence of Russian collusion?

The third prong of the investigation is financial crimes.

Based on what? Is this an investigation for something alleged based on evidence or just throwing shit against the wall and seeing if something might stick?
During the transition, Jared Kushner visited the president of a Russian bank under US sanctions.

That's not an allegation. That actually happened.

I sure as shit would like to know why.
 
Back
Top Bottom