Trump had a right to be cleared publicly if he was not personally under investigation He also is correct that it was a cloud over his administration and he owed it to the nation and those who elected Trump to enact his campaign promises. The Democrats were piggybacking off of this investigation and milking it for the very fact that there was ambiguity and they were going to tell the voters in 2018 with certainty that Trump is guilty, even though they probably know there's little there.
I am not a lawyer or an investigating officer, but I don't see this as being obstruction. All presidents make requests of their agencies, if not them then the DOJ does. If someone is going to tell me that the former administration didn't interfere in the Clinton investigation than I have a bridge for sale. Her crimes dwarf anything that Trump has done, unless some evidence comes out to prove otherwise.
Therefore, if she was not up for charges, there is a far greater case that there was obstruction in her case, especially considering how much she has profited financially from her position, than surely Trump is not.
Someone in his administration? Maybe. Trump himself? I don't believe so at this point, not even close.
DT probably owes billions to Putins bank, Clinton is a rose compared to DT. DT has never been a moral man.
More accusations, the word probably gave you away, I wouldn't want any liberals on my jury, you know the whole innocent till proven guilty thing gets in a liberals way.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ya...nothing like the conservatives treatment of Hillary
Trump had a right to be cleared publicly if he was not personally under investigation He also is correct that it was a cloud over his administration and he owed it to the nation and those who elected Trump to enact his campaign promises. The Democrats were piggybacking off of this investigation and milking it for the very fact that there was ambiguity and they were going to tell the voters in 2018 with certainty that Trump is guilty, even though they probably know there's little there.
I am not a lawyer or an investigating officer, but I don't see this as being obstruction. All presidents make requests of their agencies, if not them then the DOJ does. If someone is going to tell me that the former administration didn't interfere in the Clinton investigation than I have a bridge for sale. Her crimes dwarf anything that Trump has done, unless some evidence comes out to prove otherwise.
Therefore, if she was not up for charges, there is a far greater case that there was obstruction in her case, especially considering how much she has profited financially from her position, than surely Trump is not.
Someone in his administration? Maybe. Trump himself? I don't believe so at this point, not even close.
DT probably owes billions to Putins bank, Clinton is a rose compared to DT. DT has never been a moral man.
More accusations, the word probably gave you away, I wouldn't want any liberals on my jury, you know the whole innocent till proven guilty thing gets in a liberals way.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ya...nothing like the conservatives treatment of Hillary
the difference being that Hillary DID lie, and was busted lying, and dud break the law...but wasn't prosecuted. Everybody acknowledges her lies, corruption, and criminality....but nobody, including comey, would act on it.
Trump has been found to have committed no crimes, to have told no lies, and comey and the lying journalists have been exposed.
Hillary and holder will end their days in prison, if they don't croak first. And maybe Obama, too.