CO2 Has Almost No Effect on Global Temperature, Says Leading Climate Scientist

[jc456]

Says the guy who told us that the Russian people wouldn't have fallen for the 2016 Russian propaganda campaign against Hillary Clinton, all after he parotted all of that propaganda continues to do so.

I believe in people individualism except demofks

 

[The Original Tree]

How old are you? 12?????

I don't eat up anyone's lies. What you say about others reveals more about you than it does me. Obviously YOU fear hell and damnation, and you keep projecting your own lies and fears onto others.

My own salvation is my only concern here, and I concern myself with my own salvation. If others want to lie, cheat and falsely accuse others, well that's going to be a problem for YOU, not me.

The only person who routinely calls other people "liars" is himself a liar. Because he lies, he believes everyone does it. Everyone doesn't lie. And only liars think they do.

You think because YOU worship Donald Trump, others worship Joe Biden. They don't. Sane people never worship politicians. They know better.

You know NOTHING about the lives or beliefs of the people YOU condemn. Go back to your porn sites. You can't even quote scripture you phony evangelical.

Joe Biden's Diaper says you are a DUPE for the biggest Con Game and Global Lie and Global Warming.

Why don't yah go eat a Bug Burger, Turn off your Gas Stove, Throw your Carbon based PC out the door, and set your gasoline powered car on fire, then turn off your electricity and tell your little god mother nature you did your best to embrace the Green Hoax.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Tell me what removing 71-75% of your imaginary heat from LWIR does to your global circulation modeling?

Nothing is removing 71-75% of LWIR.

Correct: However, it's not being absorbed by the oceans. SO, tell me Todd, where did it go? The satellites tell us it was re-radiated to space, where it can no long affect our climate. They do not account for this energy loss. Just maybe that's why our modeling is crap.... Ya Thaink?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Right now it is burning fossil fuels that has increased CO2 conc, Carbon isotope ratios prove that. Now run along noddy.

It is burning fossil fuels that has made modern civilization possible.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Correct: However, it's not being absorbed by the oceans. SO, tell me Todd, where did it go? The satellites tell us it was re-radiated to space, where it can no long affect our climate. They do not account for this energy loss. Just maybe that's why our modeling is crap.... Ya Thaink?

However, it's not being absorbed by the oceans.

What is it being absorbed by?

The satellites tell us it was re-radiated to space

The satellites tell us IR hits the water and is immediately re-radiated to space? Link?

They do not account for this energy loss.

Who doesn't account for what energy loss? Link?

 

[Shareprofit]

Joe Biden's Diaper says you are a DUPE for the biggest Con Game and Global Lie and Global Warming.

Why don't yah go eat a Bug Burger, Turn off your Gas Stove, Throw your Carbon based PC out the door, and set your gasoline powered car on fire, then turn off your electricity and tell your little god mother nature you did your best to embrace the Green Hoax.

How did you get on at school pal?

 

[Shareprofit]

So what drove the higher temps back then?

Durrrrrrr is not an acceptable answer

It certainly was not Man burning fossil fuels as is happening right now.

 

[Shareprofit]

It is burning fossil fuels that has made modern civilization possible.

Yeah but those days are coming to an end. Climate change is is already causing huge risk and disruption for people in vulnerable places around the world.

 

[ding]

Yeah but those days are coming to an end. Climate change is is already causing huge risk and disruption for people in vulnerable places around the world.

No it’s not. The planet is in an interglacial period. The previous interglacial period was 2C warmer than today with 26 ft higher seas with 120 ppm LESS atmospheric CO2.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yeah but those days are coming to an end. Climate change is is already causing huge risk and disruption for people in vulnerable places around the world.

I agree, ending fossil fuel use, like the green idiots want, will end civilization.

Climate change is is already causing huge risk and disruption

Sounds serious!! Tell me, what's the risk if temps go up another 0.5 degrees?

 

[Crick]

Says a moron who is unable to commit logic.

Commit logic? What is that supposed to mean? Is logic an offense of some sort?

 

[jc456]

How did you get on at school pal?

Want his teacher to learn you huh?

 

[Crick]

I agree, ending fossil fuel use, like the green idiots want, will end civilization.

Climate change is is already causing huge risk and disruption

Sounds serious!! Tell me, what's the risk if temps go up another 0.5 degrees?

It is an established fact that human-induced greenhouse gas emissions have led to an increased frequency and/or intensity of some weather and climate extremes since pre-industrial time, in particular for temperature extremes. Evidence of observed changes in extremes and their attribution to human influence (including greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions and landuse changes) has strengthened since AR5, in particular for extreme precipitation, droughts, tropical cyclones and compound extremes (including dry/hot events and fire weather). Some recent hot extreme events would have been extremely unlikely to occur without human influence on the climate system. Regional changes in the intensity and frequency of climate extremes generally scale with global warming. New evidence strengthens the conclusion from the IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C (SR1.5) that even relatively small incremental increases in global warming (+0.5°C) cause statistically significant changes in extremes on the global scale and for large regions (high confidence). In particular, this is the case for temperature extremes (very likely), the intensification of heavy precipitation (high confidence) including that associated with tropical cyclones (medium confidence), and the worsening of droughts in some regions (high confidence). The occurrence of extreme events unprecedented in the observed record will rise with increasing global warming, even at 1.5°C of global warming. Projected percentage changes in frequency are higher for the rarer extreme events (high confidence).

AR6, Technical Summary, Executive Summary, Ch 11: "Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate"

Pg 1,517

 

[bripat9643]

It is an established fact that human-induced greenhouse gas emissions have led to an increased frequency and/or intensity of some weather and climate extremes since pre-industrial time, in particular for temperature extremes. Evidence of observed changes in extremes and their attribution to human influence (including greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions and landuse changes) has strengthened since AR5, in particular for extreme precipitation, droughts, tropical cyclones and compound extremes (including dry/hot events and fire weather).

That's not a fact at all. It's a flat-out lie. Frequency of tropical storms has not increased. Neither has intensity. The same goes for droughts and so-called "extreme weather."

Some recent hot extreme events would have been extremely unlikely to occur without human influence on the climate system.

Prove it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It is an established fact that human-induced greenhouse gas emissions have led to an increased frequency and/or intensity of some weather and climate extremes since pre-industrial time, in particular for temperature extremes. Evidence of observed changes in extremes and their attribution to human influence (including greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions and landuse changes) has strengthened since AR5, in particular for extreme precipitation, droughts, tropical cyclones and compound extremes (including dry/hot events and fire weather). Some recent hot extreme events would have been extremely unlikely to occur without human influence on the climate system. Regional changes in the intensity and frequency of climate extremes generally scale with global warming. New evidence strengthens the conclusion from the IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C (SR1.5) that even relatively small incremental increases in global warming (+0.5°C) cause statistically significant changes in extremes on the global scale and for large regions (high confidence). In particular, this is the case for temperature extremes (very likely), the intensification of heavy precipitation (high confidence) including that associated with tropical cyclones (medium confidence), and the worsening of droughts in some regions (high confidence). The occurrence of extreme events unprecedented in the observed record will rise with increasing global warming, even at 1.5°C of global warming. Projected percentage changes in frequency are higher for the rarer extreme events (high confidence).

AR6, Technical Summary, Executive Summary, Ch 11: "Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate"

Pg 1,517

It is an established fact that human-induced greenhouse gas emissions have led to an increased frequency and/or intensity of some weather and climate extremes since pre-industrial time,

That sounds serious.

How many Category 4 or 5 hurricanes were there in the 1100s?

 

[Shareprofit]

No it’s not. The planet is in an interglacial period. The previous interglacial period was 2C warmer than today with 26 ft higher seas with 120 ppm LESS atmospheric CO2.

Glacial periods take thousands of years not global warming in decades as is happing now. CO2 is a GHG it's a fact so stop your irrational denial. You sound like a Trumpter.

 

[Leo123]

Glacial periods take thousands of years not global warming in decades as is happing now. CO2 is a GHG it's a fact so stop your irrational denial. You sound like a Trumpter.

Human caused global warming is not happening now.

 

[Shareprofit]

I agree, ending fossil fuel use, like the green idiots want, will end civilization.

Climate change is is already causing huge risk and disruption

Sounds serious!! Tell me, what's the risk if temps go up another 0.5 degrees?

The green movement does not want to end fossil fuels but reduce their use.

 

[Billy_Bob]

However, it's not being absorbed by the oceans.

What is it being absorbed by?

The satellites tell us it was re-radiated to space

The satellites tell us IR hits the water and is immediately re-radiated to space? Link?

They do not account for this energy loss.

Who doesn't account for what energy loss? Link?

Todd the modeling is wrong. The ERBE satellite data tells us it is wrong. Come on Todd, use that thing between your ears, even if it is for just one minuet.

 

[Shareprofit]

Want his teacher to learn you huh?

The teacher is likely very skilled but the idiot pupil CC denier who has never been told anything in his life is the problem.