Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can refer you to them. Address your question to the AAAS. There are thousands. I referred to a couple several posts ago.
Are you from Texas ? That’s where the Oklahoman moved which raised the IQ average level of both states.Can't stop spewing bullshit can you swine?
Of course. You guys ask for something that would take scads of space to post, you should just fking read it yourself. That’s a source.You've been repeating your claim, repeatedly, but I have to go to the AAAS for your evidence? DURR
Of course. You guys ask for something that would take scads of space to post, you should just fking read it yourself. That’s a source.
It’s a lot easier then then posting the plethora of drivel you’ve been doing. Do you need help spelling AAAS ?but I have to go to the AAAS for your evidence? DURR
Scads.How many thousands of things are included in this world-wide "consensus"?
Or is it tens of thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Millions?
Do they take a vote on each thing? Is it unanimous? Or 50% plus 1?
It’s a lot easier then then posting the plethora of drivel you’ve been doing. Do you need help spelling AAAS ?
.The rats are starting to abandon ship:
CO2 Has Almost No Effect on Global Temperature, Says Leading Climate ScientistForget ‘settled’ science or ‘consensus’ – that is a political construct designed to quash debate in the interests of promoting a command-and-control Net Zero agenda. One of the great drivers of continual changes in the climate is heat exchange within both the atmosphere and the Earth’s surface. Current understanding of the entire picture is limited, and it seems the opportunity has been taken to fill this gap by blaming carbon dioxide almost entirely for the recent gentle warming. A new paper on the so-called ‘greenhouse’ effect highlights the vital role played by oceans and water vapour flows. CO2 is said to have “minimal effect” on the Earth’s temperature and climate.The paper has been published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) and is written by meteorologist William Kininmonth, a former consultant to the World Meteorological Organisation’s Commission for Climatology and former head of the Australian Government’s National Climate Centre. Kininmonth argues that the oceans are the “vital inertial and thermal flywheels” of the climate system. If one wants to control climate, it will be necessary to control the oceans, he argues. “Efforts to decarbonise in the hope of affecting global temperatures will be in vain,” he adds.In Kininmonth’s view, the recent warming is “probably simply the result of fluctuations in the ever-changing ocean circulation”. CO2 “must be recognised” as a very minor contributor to the observed warming, and one that is unlikely to prolong the warming trend beyond the peak generated by the natural oceanic oscillations, he notes. He explains that the main driver of global temperature is the movement of energy in water, both in the oceans and the atmosphere after evaporation.As CO₂ concentration increases from 0 to 600 parts per million (green bars), the total strength of the greenhouse effect, measured as the energy the greenhouse gases radiate to the Earth’s surface, barely changes (orange line). Source: Kininmonth 2022
Typical Leftist excuse maker. Sure it's fine for Al Jazeera Gore to push a lie and make hundred of millions of dollars doing it. It's the Democrat way!Of course he made money on global warming. Dah . How stupid would it be for him not to.
Not in science however.Dude, the word “ consensus “ is in the English language.
Not in science however.
Why don’t you post the consensus study
Reproduced studiesI have no idea what your point is. Its pretty trivial since you can’t refute anything I’ve said, you’re down to acting stupid.
”the consensus study” Are you saying stupidly that science did a study on the word “ consensus ?”.
Any other words you think science should study ?
Oh, and science never uses the English language here in the USA ? So, they are not allowed to use the word “consensus” ?Not in science however.
Why don’t you post the consensus study
Me? Is you that want’s to see a study on the word “consensus”. What an effin troll.Reproduced studies
So let’s see. You don’t know the meaning of the word consensus, but you insist science can’t use the word. you are one strange mfr.Reproduced studies
Hahaha haha no such thing in science,So let’s see. You don’t know the meaning of the word consensus, but you insist science can’t use the word. you are one strange mfr.
No such thing as what ?Hahaha haha no such thing in science,
Why do you think there is such a thing?
Prove it .Hahaha haha no such thing in science,
Why do you think there is such a thing?
No, I'm not butthurt over your insult.Butthurt over a joke. Closet leftist?