Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1
The discussion begins around 5:20
This was just posted so it isn't old.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yup, no new plants since 1990The greening from additional CO2 stopped in the 1990s. Additional CO2 since then has had no effect on plant growth. Plant growth is now limited by other bottlenecks.
The discussion begins around 5:20
This was just posted so it isn't old.
It's a long podcast so take your time. I have it on in the backgroundMr Carlson claims, right off the bat, that we have seen little discussion of the carbon cycle from "alarmists". Allow me to point you to page 79 of the Technical Summary of AR6's Physical Science Basis where a discussion of the carbon cycle begins and continues for more than 25 pages. The carbon cycle is mentioned or discussed at hundreds of spots in this document.
View attachment 802782
I have to run some errands. I will get back to this in a bit.
What are all these baby pine trees that are growing in my forest?Yup, no new plants since 1990![]()
Imagination clearlyWhat are all these baby pine trees that are growing in my forest?
I have skipped through it. I am familiar with photosynthesis and what happens when you increase CO2 levels. Unfortunately, that will not compensate for the harm caused by raising the Earth's temperature by several degrees.It's a long podcast so take your time. I have it on in the background
nice opinion, too bad it aint factI have skipped through it. I am familiar with photosynthesis and what happens when you increase CO2 levels. Unfortunately, that will not compensate for the harm caused by raising the Earth's temperature by several degrees.
Have you looked at "The Physical Science Basis"?
The video? It's factual for the most part. But I saw no discussion whatsoever about greenhouse warming or what would actually be involved in shifting agriculture towards the poles.nice opinion, too bad it aint fact
bullshitThe video? It's factual for the most part. But I saw no discussion whatsoever about greenhouse warming or what would actually be involved in shifting agriculture towards the poles.
You don't seem to be following the conversation. Did you watch the video in the OP? That'd be a start.bullshit
just about everything you post, say, quote, and think is pure bullshit, and without a link you can not articulate a damn thing about CO2 and the Heavy Industry that is what you call clean.
The discussion begins around 5:20
This was just posted so it isn't old.
Right up until the trees light up.A warmer earth is always a benefit to life overall.
NoI have skipped through it. I am familiar with photosynthesis and what happens when you increase CO2 levels. Unfortunately, that will not compensate for the harm caused by raising the Earth's temperature by several degrees.
Have you looked at "The Physical Science Basis"?
Right up until the trees light up.
Well we don't have that problem. We have an idiot problem. From not properly tending dead overgrowth to unattended camp fires to cigarettes to fireworks then finally lightning which falls back on overgrowthRight up until the trees light up.
I bet you that a drastic weather change can enhance the fire risk a lot faster than the forestry service can tend to the dead and dying overgrowth.Well we don't have that problem. We have an idiot problem. From not properly tending dead overgrowth to unattended camp fires to cigarettes to fireworks then finally lightning which falls back on overgrowth
Yes because that is NORMAL. TranspirationDid you ever think that some of that water comes from America's forests