CNN's Brian Steler Says It's Too Early To Tell If CNN+, That only Lasted 2 Weeks, Was A Success Or Not

[easyt65]

"In what had to be one of the biggest news industry boondoggles in history, hundreds of millions of dollars were sunk into a project that lasted only two weeks. Even still, CNN’s Brian Stelter proclaimed that “t’s too early to know if this product, if this service was a success or a failure,” because lying is like breathing for hosts on the liberal network. The reactions overall were comical."

Bwuhahahahahahahaha.

Does anyone seriously watch CNN for any other reason than its comedic value anymore?

The Saga of CNN+ Somehow Manages to Get Even More Hilarious

Maybe wasting tens of millions of dollars on subpar talent wasn't the best move here?

redstate.com

 

[Rambunctious]

This guy is losing his mind.... What a fat bald fairy....

 

[Natural Citizen]

This guy is losing his mind.... What a fat bald fairy....

I dunno, man.

Seems like his think tank has always been running on empty.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Given the fact that you were asking people to pay $9 to see content you could get on the regular CNN news feed and that the streaming market is saturated already, is it a huge surprise it folded?
Here's an idea. How about a 24x7 Politics Junkie channel. Not just national politics...but local around the US of A? Everything from A to Z.

Hell, you'd be surprised by the amount of attention some political issues can get.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Given the fact that you were asking people to pay $9 to see content you could get on the regular CNN news feed and that the streaming market is saturated already, is it a huge surprise it folded?
Here's an idea. How about a 24x7 Politics Junkie channel. Not just national politics...but local around the US of A? Everything from A to Z.

Hell, you'd be surprised by the amount of attention some political issues can get.

Yet CNN spent 9 million on it.
What does that say about CNN?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Yet CNN spent 9 million on it.
What does that say about CNN?

That they overestimated interest in an already saturated market. They believed that people would buy in masses because of the CNN name. Then they put the same type of programming on that you could see with your regular cable subscription. How long would you pay $9 for that? What it says...is that CNN needs some better business market analysts.

 

[miketx]

Yet CNN spent 9 million on it.
What does that say about CNN?

They heap plenty stupid! Like a lot of leftist turds.