Both CNN and Buzfeed reported that the dossier was, as yet, unverified. What they reported was the truth...the dossier exists and both the President and the petulant elect were briefed on a two page synopsis of it. There was nothing false in CNN or Buzzfeads reporting.
No, they reported on the content and there is absolutely NO evidence to support anything in the content. You can do your little tap-dance and pretend they covered their bases by using phrases like "yet to be verified" or whatever. We all know what they did and what they were trying to imply. You leftists do this shit all the time. It's why it was SO ironic that you complained about "fake news" when Hildabitch lost the election.
And they stated that the dossier was unverified. Nothing false in the reporting. Not liking what it said does not make it false or fake. You have not been able to identify a single thing they were untruthful about...that's because they weren't. They reported on
exactly what was going on.
Now nobody has said anything was "false" ...it was FAKE! Do you comprehend these are two entirely different words with different meanings or are you mentally deficient? You can report something that's not entirely false but it can still be FAKE... and that's what CNN and Buzzfeed did. That's what the left-wing news media does all the time.
No, it's
unverified, not fake. There is nothing fake about it. The dossier exists, has existed for months and has been in the hands of the FBI since this summer. President Obama and Petulant Elect Trump were both briefed on the contents. This is all true and not "fake". Also, CNN did not release the contents of the dossier, Buzzfeed did. Stop conflating the two organizations. CNN reported on a true story. No embellishments, no falsehoods and they stated unequivocally that the dossier was unverified.
I read a headline the other day about Trump's secretary of agriculture nominee, Sonny Perdue. The man was the ******* governor of Georgia! The headline read: Sonny Perdue, who once prayed for rain, is Trump's pick for Agriculture. Now what the hell do you call that shit? Is that honest journalistic integrity to you? No... that's a left-wing hit job by a left-wing hack.
You read a headline where? Context is important. Go to Brietbart or Drudge and read me some of those headlines, mkay? Also, it was a true headline was it not? I remember when that happened. It was national news. Here's an NPR article from 2007.
In Drought-Stricken Georgia, a Prayer for Rain
At the state capitol in Georgia Tuesday, the governor tried something different. On a partly cloudy warm fall day, hundreds of people from the region came to join Gov. Sonny Perdue in a prayer service for rain.
"I'm here today to appeal to you and to all Georgians and all people who believe in the power of prayer to ask God to shower our state, our region, our nation with the blessings of water," Perdue said.
So, tell me what's so "dishonest" about reporting that? Imagine for a hot second that an appointee of Barack Obama's had held a public rain dance. What would the Drudge or Brietbart or even Fox headlines have been?
The days of this kind of shit are OVER buddy... you started this "fake news" crap and you're gonna get it shoved straight up your ass for the next 8 years. Enjoy!
You have to prove it is fake, little buddy. You haven't.