CNN Stops Even TRYING To Pretend They Are Un-Biased - Goes 'All In' For Hillary

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,235
2,645
This is CNN: David Gergen Attacks ‘Clinton Cash’ While Network Refuses to Ask Hillary About Scandals

CNN has gone from refusing to ask Hillary Clinton a direct question about the millions of dollars that flowed from foreign governments to the Clinton Foundation while she was Secretary of State — as detailed in Breitbart Senior Editor at Large Peter Schweizer’s book Clinton Cash — to attacking Schweizer and disparaging the book’s research without naming sources. (or any evidence to support their attacks).

"On Thursday, Breitbart News reached out to CNN’s senior media correspondent and host of Reliable Sources Brian Stelter and asked him if his network has asked or plans to ask Hillary Clinton about the millions in Clinton Foundation donations that came as her State Department approved the transfer of 20% of U.S. uranium to the Russian government or about her brother Tony Rodham being granted a rare “gold exploitation permit” in Haiti as then Secretary Clinton dispersed billions of U.S. relief dollars. We also would like to know what sources David Gergen used as the basis for his claim that the meticulously researched key details put forth in Clinton Cash are, as he put it, “basically discredited.”

----
Steller refused to provide the sources he supposedly used to come to the conclusion that there was nothing to the 'Clinton Cash claims and refused to answer the question about when CNN would ever ask Hillary about any of it...surprise surprise!

--------------------

"On Wednesday, Breitbart’s Washington Politics Editor Matthew Boyle outlined the overwhelming mainstream media coverage and confirmation of Clinton Cash thusly:


The New Yorker confirmed that Bill Clinton received half a million dollars for a speech that was paid for by “a Russian investment bank that had ties to the Kremlin” while the Uranium One deal was ongoing.

The Wall Street Journal confirmed details about donations from Canadian mining executive Stephen Dattels.

The New York Times has also confirmed more on the Uranium One deal, while Bloomberg has confirmed the details about the Laureate Education, Inc., area of the scandal.

The Washington Post also confirmed details about how much of the Clintons’ wealth comes from the foundation, while CBS News confirmed details about Schweizer’s deep dive on Jeb Bush—the former Florida governor.

ABC News confirmed the paid speeches revelations, and those connections to Hillary Clinton’s work as Secretary of State."

...yet CNN simply declares, without evidence, that none of it is true and refuses to ask Hillary questions about any of it.

---------------------

"If it is beyond the capability of CNN’s staff of journalists and reporters to produce pointed questions for this line of inquiry, Breitbart News has already rounded up nearly two dozen on their behalf from the pages of the New York Times, the Huffington Post, and the Associated Press, among many others.


Stelter has yet to respond to Breitbart News’ inquiry."


:lmao:


This is CNN: David Gergen Attacks ‘Clinton Cash’ While Network Refuses to Ask Hillary About Scandals - Breitbart
 
Agreed, Grampa, but what CNN is doing is a criminal lack of journalistic integrity, laid out in front of God and everyone to see.
 
I've noticed that CNN plays a little game of pretending to be "Fair and Balanced". They run some softball spots on Hillary in the morning during periods of low viewership. For instance today where the host questions "Is the Brexit a vote against political elitism and does that implicate Hillary"? Of course Maria Cardona immediately deflects the question like the Liberal pull toy she is and starts squawking about Trump.
BUT....during prime time on CNN you will NEVER SEE anything remotely negative about Hillary and almost exclusively you WILL SEE anti-Trump smear pieces.
 
Agreed, Grampa, but what CNN is doing is a criminal lack of journalistic integrity, laid out in front of God and everyone to see.

If non fox information scares you so much I suggest you limit your viewing to only fox. After all, they will always tell you exactly what you want to hear.
 
CNN and CNBC and the other media outlets, including the alt right nonsense noise makers, see the Dangerous Donald train wreck coming.

They all want to make $$$.
 
If non fox information scares you so much I suggest you limit your viewing to only fox. After all, they will always tell you exactly what you want to hear.
Bull, 'non-FOX' info doesn't scare me. It's 'Non-FACTUAL' information being pushed by a 'news' agency that has me concerned. CNN, over the past 3 - 4 days, has gotten flat-out BUSTED dishonestly reporting on numerous stories - omitting facts or just simply LYING. As the title of the thread says, they have now completely given up any attempt to seem Unbiased or as having any journalistic integrity. It has nothing to do with anyone else - just THEM!
 
"a criminal lack of journalistic integrity" describes the far right media.
 
dopes actually think because it's the "clinton foundation", she gets all the $$$$

hoooooot hhooootttttt ..:banana:
 
Agreed, Grampa, but what CNN is doing is a criminal lack of journalistic integrity, laid out in front of God and everyone to see.

It is a sort of malicious malpractice when you think about it. The deliberate manipulation of public opinion for the purpose of keeping authoritarians you prefer running the show. Who care's if it's Goebel's or a handful of billionaires. There can be just as sinister an agenda.


 
If non fox information scares you so much I suggest you limit your viewing to only fox. After all, they will always tell you exactly what you want to hear.
Bull, 'non-FOX' info doesn't scare me. It's 'Non-FACTUAL' information being pushed by a 'news' agency that has me concerned. CNN, over the past 3 - 4 days, has gotten flat-out BUSTED dishonestly reporting on numerous stories - omitting facts or just simply LYING. As the title of the thread says, they have now completely given up any attempt to seem Unbiased or as having any journalistic integrity. It has nothing to do with anyone else - just THEM!

If CNN are biased why are they not talking about this guy.
Paul Manafort - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

He is probably the most senior staffer on Trump team... He ran a tortuers lobby and represented some of the most depicable people in the last 25 years...

Manafort accepted $900,000 yearly to lobby for Ferdinand Marcos. He was also involved in lobbying for Siad Barre of Somalia, and Mobutu Sese Seko of Zaïre. His firm also lobbied on behalf of the governments of the Dominican Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Kenya (between $660-750,000 yearly 1991 and 1993), and Nigeria ($1 million in 1991). These activities led Manafort's firm to be listed amongst the top five lobbying firms receiving money from human-rights abusing regimes in the report "The Torturer's Lobby."
 
This is CNN: David Gergen Attacks ‘Clinton Cash’ While Network Refuses to Ask Hillary About Scandals

CNN has gone from refusing to ask Hillary Clinton a direct question about the millions of dollars that flowed from foreign governments to the Clinton Foundation while she was Secretary of State — as detailed in Breitbart Senior Editor at Large Peter Schweizer’s book Clinton Cash — to attacking Schweizer and disparaging the book’s research without naming sources. (or any evidence to support their attacks).

"On Thursday, Breitbart News reached out to CNN’s senior media correspondent and host of Reliable Sources Brian Stelter and asked him if his network has asked or plans to ask Hillary Clinton about the millions in Clinton Foundation donations that came as her State Department approved the transfer of 20% of U.S. uranium to the Russian government or about her brother Tony Rodham being granted a rare “gold exploitation permit” in Haiti as then Secretary Clinton dispersed billions of U.S. relief dollars. We also would like to know what sources David Gergen used as the basis for his claim that the meticulously researched key details put forth in Clinton Cash are, as he put it, “basically discredited.”

----
Steller refused to provide the sources he supposedly used to come to the conclusion that there was nothing to the 'Clinton Cash claims and refused to answer the question about when CNN would ever ask Hillary about any of it...surprise surprise!

--------------------

"On Wednesday, Breitbart’s Washington Politics Editor Matthew Boyle outlined the overwhelming mainstream media coverage and confirmation of Clinton Cash thusly:


The New Yorker confirmed that Bill Clinton received half a million dollars for a speech that was paid for by “a Russian investment bank that had ties to the Kremlin” while the Uranium One deal was ongoing.

The Wall Street Journal confirmed details about donations from Canadian mining executive Stephen Dattels.

The New York Times has also confirmed more on the Uranium One deal, while Bloomberg has confirmed the details about the Laureate Education, Inc., area of the scandal.

The Washington Post also confirmed details about how much of the Clintons’ wealth comes from the foundation, while CBS News confirmed details about Schweizer’s deep dive on Jeb Bush—the former Florida governor.

ABC News confirmed the paid speeches revelations, and those connections to Hillary Clinton’s work as Secretary of State."

...yet CNN simply declares, without evidence, that none of it is true and refuses to ask Hillary questions about any of it.

---------------------

"If it is beyond the capability of CNN’s staff of journalists and reporters to produce pointed questions for this line of inquiry, Breitbart News has already rounded up nearly two dozen on their behalf from the pages of the New York Times, the Huffington Post, and the Associated Press, among many others.


Stelter has yet to respond to Breitbart News’ inquiry."


:lmao:


This is CNN: David Gergen Attacks ‘Clinton Cash’ While Network Refuses to Ask Hillary About Scandals - Breitbart
Uranium deal? Oh fuck. Not ANOTHER ridiculous right wingernut conspiracy. Besides "birtherism" was the best one yet.
 
Uranium deal? Oh fuck. Not ANOTHER ridiculous right wingernut conspiracy. Besides "birtherism" was the best one yet.

Late to the conversation, rdean wades in, proving he has not read any of the links or seeing any of the PROVEN, DOCUMENTED facts that have been CONFIRMED by ABC, NBC, the AP, New York Times, and others. As the saying goes, rdean, 'sometimes it is better to stay silent and let people think you are stupid than to open your mouth and prove they are correct.'
 
If non fox information scares you so much I suggest you limit your viewing to only fox. After all, they will always tell you exactly what you want to hear.
Bull, 'non-FOX' info doesn't scare me. It's 'Non-FACTUAL' information being pushed by a 'news' agency that has me concerned. CNN, over the past 3 - 4 days, has gotten flat-out BUSTED dishonestly reporting on numerous stories - omitting facts or just simply LYING. As the title of the thread says, they have now completely given up any attempt to seem Unbiased or as having any journalistic integrity. It has nothing to do with anyone else - just THEM!


Clearly you would prefer someone along the lines of Stacy Dash to help you understand such complex developments. She's on fox, and with her resume including things like Clueless, she's a natural for you and for fox.
 
If CNN are biased why are they not talking about...
Why don't you call 'em up and ask them? OH WAIT - THEY AREN'T ANSWERING QUESTIONS ABOUT THEIR BS BIAS REPORTING.... :p


I'm sure they aren't answering questions about their office building being used as a landing pad for interstellar lizard people. They don't have time to respond to every stupid conspiracy theory nut with a dumb question.
 

Forum List

Back
Top