CNN Pushes Children's Book With A Black Homosexual Santa

[LoneLaugher]

Why?

Really? These are children. Why should they be shown perverted crap, at that age.

Don't show it to your kids. Problem solved.

Now stop whining.

Like i said, you dont teach sex to small kids. What kind of pervert are you? They need to play and have fun, not confused with adult relationships.

Who said anything about sex? (Except a couple of your pals obsessed with gay guys doing it)

Lol, whatever. If this crap is in schools then bibles should also, just as easy to get. If this stuff is being read in kindergarten, then the bible also should be read.

If the teacher presents it as fiction, I'm cool with the Bible being read in school.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

When you said this...isn't it funny, how similar the two ends of the spectrum are?

You appear to think I'm a right winger. I get that a lot from both ends - "admit it, you're a (other side) winger".

In response to this, I've laid out my positions on the issues clearly in the thread linked at the end of the second line of my sig.

I'm no right winger, and the right wingers here will attest to that.
.

I do think you are a right winger based on the fact you never go after the right, only the left.

I go after Regressives. I don't care for Regressives. I like liberals, moderates, centrists, independents, and I can get along just fine with conservatives as long as they don't lose their shit on me.

Regressives? No. No thanks. Just personal taste, I guess.

I'm a left-leaning independent, and that is illustrated clearly in that link.
.

Well, help me out then and explain what, in your view, is a regressive

Great question. Prepare for a link.

I am good with links. And clearly I was wrong about him since you are so against him.

 

[Asclepias]

Isnt this a more wholesome dynamic than a fat white guy molesting his reindeer?

What? Teaching kids that all blacks are homosexual? If you say so.

I say so. I dont want Black kids raping reindeer like all whites do.

 

[Moonglow]

Don't bring your family into it if you don't want them discussed.

I'm well aware of that. I have never & would never take someone's family sharing out of context. I expect the same in return. If I don't get that it speaks,about you not me.

Got it. You want to use your family as a tool to try proving your point, but think nobody else should say anything. What a selfish thing to do. Hypocrite.

You're free to engage me about my family when I post about them. You're not free to use them as a weapon. I fail to see that as hypocrisy

Bringing up family is against the rules... or at least it was.

If someone brings their family into the discussion, it seems that responding about said family should be fair game.

It is as long as you keep it clean..

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Oh, because you're a Regressive. Trying to have a normal conversation with people like you is pointless.

Your very first post in this little conversation of ours was a lovely example. Thanks for that.

Easiest question I'll get all day.
.

So, by assigning me the title of "regressive", you've given yourself an excuse to not actually engage my posts? It's like a built-in excuse to run away?

That's a very crafty way of being pathetic.

Whatever you say. You are what you are. You went mental over one of my posts about Regressives, it happens frequently here.

You folks can't control yourselves, you HAVE to self-identify for me.

Now please, take the last post, I will not respond. I don't want to be responsible for your latest drama queening. It's tedious.
.

He insulted you in his response taking the last word. I quoted it to further mock him but he deleted the post and it wouldn't let me quote it.

Too funny

.

I'm glad you found your cheering section. I know how much comfort you derive from people agreeing with you. I'm sure the mutual back-slapping makes you feel much better.

Let's not lose track of the topic of this thread, though - grown-ass men whining about Santa stories they don't like.

Tell me again who's "triggered".

The only triggered group is the one freaking out about the existence of this book. It seems to be a threat to their very way of life.

 

[Moonglow]

Isnt this a more wholesome dynamic than a fat white guy molesting his reindeer?

What? Teaching kids that all blacks are homosexual? If you say so.

I say so. I dont want Black kids raping reindeer like all whites do.

That only happens in Lapland...

 

[Mac1958]

Well, help me out then and explain what, in your view, is a regressive

Sure!

In fact, I'll have other liberals do it, so that it's not just coming from me. The guy on the top is the liberal Muslim Brit who actually COINED the term. Then a few other actual liberals who are horrified by how the Regressives have distorted and polluted and usurped liberalism.

ALL the material, examples and opinions you'll EVER need to understand the term:
.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

That's fine. I expressed my OPINION and half the leftists in this thread came unglued. Why is that?

On a side note my oldest daughter is bi and now has children of her own. She would also be offended by this nonsense. Not because of who Santa is portrayed as but because of the attempt to whitewash our history and the traditions it contains.

Don't bring your family into it if you don't want them discussed.

I'm well aware of that. I have never & would never take someone's family sharing out of context. I expect the same in return. If I don't get that it speaks,about you not me.

Got it. You want to use your family as a tool to try proving your point, but think nobody else should say anything. What a selfish thing to do. Hypocrite.

You're free to engage me about my family when I post about them. You're not free to use them as a weapon. I fail to see that as hypocrisy

But you can?

I haven't spoken about anyone's family.
Put the crack pipe down son. It's Christmas Eve for Christs sake.

 

[miketx]

Why are all these nuts talking about Santa having sex with kids?

Liberals want all kids exposed to the sickness of faggotry. It's what you push.

You need help. There are gay people. Your kids should know that they are just like anyone else. You shouldn't frighten your kids with wild stories about gay people being sick. It's irresponsible parenting.

Anyone who tells their kids faggots are normal should be locked up.

 

[LoneLaugher]

You appear to think I'm a right winger. I get that a lot from both ends - "admit it, you're a (other side) winger".

In response to this, I've laid out my positions on the issues clearly in the thread linked at the end of the second line of my sig.

I'm no right winger, and the right wingers here will attest to that.
.

I do think you are a right winger based on the fact you never go after the right, only the left.

I go after Regressives. I don't care for Regressives. I like liberals, moderates, centrists, independents, and I can get along just fine with conservatives as long as they don't lose their shit on me.

Regressives? No. No thanks. Just personal taste, I guess.

I'm a left-leaning independent, and that is illustrated clearly in that link.
.

Well, help me out then and explain what, in your view, is a regressive

Great question. Prepare for a link.

I am good with links. And clearly I was wrong about him since you are so against him.

When you said this...isn't it funny, how similar the two ends of the spectrum are?

You appear to think I'm a right winger. I get that a lot from both ends - "admit it, you're a (other side) winger".

In response to this, I've laid out my positions on the issues clearly in the thread linked at the end of the second line of my sig.

I'm no right winger, and the right wingers here will attest to that.
.

I do think you are a right winger based on the fact you never go after the right, only the left.

I go after Regressives. I don't care for Regressives. I like liberals, moderates, centrists, independents, and I can get along just fine with conservatives as long as they don't lose their shit on me.

Regressives? No. No thanks. Just personal taste, I guess.

I'm a left-leaning independent, and that is illustrated clearly in that link.
.

Well, help me out then and explain what, in your view, is a regressive

Sure!

In fact, I'll have other liberals do it, so that it's not just coming from me. The guy on the top is the liberal Muslim Brit who actually COINED the term. Then a few other actual liberals who are horrified by how the Regressives have distorted and polluted and usurped liberalism.

ALL the material, examples and opinions you'll EVER need to understand the term:
.

What did I tell ya?

 

[miketx]

Holy crap.

This, from the same guy who had just written:
Seriously. You're damaged.
.

Why is it that you can't seem to bring yourself to actually respond to my posts?

Do they intimidate you, like Grampa's tough guy routine?

Oh, because you're a Regressive. Trying to have a normal conversation with people like you is pointless.

Your very first post in this little conversation of ours was a lovely example. Thanks for that.

Easiest question I'll get all day.
.

So, by assigning me the title of "regressive", you've given yourself an excuse to not actually engage my posts? It's like a built-in excuse to run away?

That's a very crafty way of being pathetic.

I have found it to be very time wasteful to engage many regressives in anything. You see it is proven daily here that they cannot stand up under scrutiny and once discovered they lie and smoke and spin and attack and pretend. In other words they refuse to engage in the topic. Right here it is happening.

*pats head*

If I'm the "regressive", how come Mac is the one who refuses to engage?

Just a guess but perhaps he has and has discovered like I have it is a total waste of time.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Why are all these nuts talking about Santa having sex with kids?

Liberals want all kids exposed to the sickness of faggotry. It's what you push.

You need help. There are gay people. Your kids should know that they are just like anyone else. You shouldn't frighten your kids with wild stories about gay people being sick. It's irresponsible parenting.

Anyone who tells their kids faggots are normal should be locked up.

You are a dying breed. Good for everyone else.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Why is it that you can't seem to bring yourself to actually respond to my posts?

Do they intimidate you, like Grampa's tough guy routine?

Oh, because you're a Regressive. Trying to have a normal conversation with people like you is pointless.

Your very first post in this little conversation of ours was a lovely example. Thanks for that.

Easiest question I'll get all day.
.

So, by assigning me the title of "regressive", you've given yourself an excuse to not actually engage my posts? It's like a built-in excuse to run away?

That's a very crafty way of being pathetic.

I have found it to be very time wasteful to engage many regressives in anything. You see it is proven daily here that they cannot stand up under scrutiny and once discovered they lie and smoke and spin and attack and pretend. In other words they refuse to engage in the topic. Right here it is happening.

*pats head*

If I'm the "regressive", how come Mac is the one who refuses to engage?

Just a guess but perhaps he has and has discovered like I have it is a total waste of time.

...and the cop-out comes.

Endlessly predictable.

 

[miketx]

Why are all these nuts talking about Santa having sex with kids?

Liberals want all kids exposed to the sickness of faggotry. It's what you push.

You need help. There are gay people. Your kids should know that they are just like anyone else. You shouldn't frighten your kids with wild stories about gay people being sick. It's irresponsible parenting.

Anyone who tells their kids faggots are normal should be locked up.

You are a dying breed. Good for everyone else.

NO I am not. Clear headed thinking people are not a dying breed. We have taken the country back from girlie men faggots and are weeding you out, like the cancer you are.

 

[miketx]

Oh, because you're a Regressive. Trying to have a normal conversation with people like you is pointless.

Your very first post in this little conversation of ours was a lovely example. Thanks for that.

Easiest question I'll get all day.
.

So, by assigning me the title of "regressive", you've given yourself an excuse to not actually engage my posts? It's like a built-in excuse to run away?

That's a very crafty way of being pathetic.

I have found it to be very time wasteful to engage many regressives in anything. You see it is proven daily here that they cannot stand up under scrutiny and once discovered they lie and smoke and spin and attack and pretend. In other words they refuse to engage in the topic. Right here it is happening.

*pats head*

If I'm the "regressive", how come Mac is the one who refuses to engage?

Just a guess but perhaps he has and has discovered like I have it is a total waste of time.

...and the cop-out comes.

Endlessly predictable.

You see? Your reply is why it's useless to debate you. I simply answered your question, and you spin it. And it was just a guess on his part, but to me, I have seen how useless it is to debate liberals,

 

[Mac1958]

I have seen how useless it is to debate liberals

Liberals are good, positive, open-minded, tolerant, America-loving people.

You're dealing with Regressives here. Two different things.
.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

So, by assigning me the title of "regressive", you've given yourself an excuse to not actually engage my posts? It's like a built-in excuse to run away?

That's a very crafty way of being pathetic.

I have found it to be very time wasteful to engage many regressives in anything. You see it is proven daily here that they cannot stand up under scrutiny and once discovered they lie and smoke and spin and attack and pretend. In other words they refuse to engage in the topic. Right here it is happening.

*pats head*

If I'm the "regressive", how come Mac is the one who refuses to engage?

Just a guess but perhaps he has and has discovered like I have it is a total waste of time.

...and the cop-out comes.

Endlessly predictable.

You see? Your reply is why it's useless to debate you. I simply answered your question, and you spin it. And it was just a guess on his part, but to me, I have seen how useless it is to debate liberals,

You answered my question by saying "I won't respond to you because your politics aren't the same as mine".

That's the definition of a cop-out - particularly because this is a political message board - the point of which is to argue about politics.

I guess you're looking for more of an echo-chamber? There are sites like that, you know.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Why are all these nuts talking about Santa having sex with kids?

Liberals want all kids exposed to the sickness of faggotry. It's what you push.

You need help. There are gay people. Your kids should know that they are just like anyone else. You shouldn't frighten your kids with wild stories about gay people being sick. It's irresponsible parenting.

Anyone who tells their kids faggots are normal should be locked up.

You are a dying breed. Good for everyone else.

NO I am not. Clear headed thinking people are not a dying breed. We have taken the country back from girlie men faggots and are weeding you out, like the cancer you are.

Gay men can get married and trannies can serve in the US Miltary. You lost. Teach your kids the right way or they will be mocked as idiots.

 

[Moonglow]

The book was written and illustrated by a man and a woman, both heretosexuals and both married.....

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Well, help me out then and explain what, in your view, is a regressive

Sure!

In fact, I'll have other liberals do it, so that it's not just coming from me. The guy on the top is the liberal Muslim Brit who actually COINED the term. Then a few other actual liberals who are horrified by how the Regressives have distorted and polluted and usurped liberalism.

ALL the material, examples and opinions you'll EVER need to understand the term:
.

Thanks. First let me apologize for misunderstanding your political perspective.

I will say after listening to just a couple of the videos, I am not sure how this book fall under the umbrella of "regressives".