Statistikhengst you didn't see this coming? Party bullshit aside this is inevitable. I told you this a while ago. Biden is going to have to enter, there's no two ways about it. He's the only one that is going to save the election for Dems. Not saying he'll beat Trump but it will be one hell of a close election. Could go either way. Biden/Trump will be an epic election.
I will go on "record" as saying if Trump doesn't **** everything up (and he's getting dangerously close to it) and doesn't win the Republican nomination, the Democrats/Biden will win the Presidency. Why? The majority of Trump supporters will NOT vote in the election dooming the Republican's.
Uhm, 2 weeks of bad polling does not an election loss make.
I wrote it that way to make you think.
For 2.5 years STRAIGHT, Clinton was creaming the GOP and Righties screamed that polls were meaningless. But show her losing in one or two polls and suddenly, Righties are say "I told you".
LOL.
And if Biden does jump in and wins, then I am also quite satisfied. Anything to keep a fucked up Republican from undoing progress.
I know you love statistics, but a statistical point in time means nothing, until you look at what the statistics said before about the same thing.
All the Democrats want to talk about Trump. Put him down, kick him, smear him, and they are the nice people, the real dastardly ones are the establishment Republicans, lol. What the Democrats should be doing instead, is finding a viable candidate.
The easiest one for the Republicans to beat is Sanders, no doubt about it. Next is Hillary. Hardest is Biden. Why? Because Biden is not rich, he is a very good debater, and he is an every man. It would be kinda hard to throw or find massive dirt on Biden, Hillary, not so much. Biden is comfort for independents. Just wait till they bring up that Hillary tried to get Obamacare before there was Obamacare, when she was 1st lady; that will be all bad.
People of ALL political persuasions have a normal tendency NOT to want to make a familial political dynasty. I know this is one reason your statistics are screwed up when looking back at GWs election, but I digress. It is ONE reason GOPers reject Jeb to the tune of 47%. It is also why if most any GOP candidate but Jeb runs against Hillary, Hillary will lose. People will come out to vote who could care less either way, just to STOP another familial empire in the Whitehouse. (I know you doubt that, but I am willing to say it is true to the tune of 1 to 2%)
This is exactly why when I read the thread about how Democrats have 246 electoral votes right out of the box, I started to snicker to myself. Under normal conditions, I would be skeptical at the very least. But under THESE conditions, nothing is out of the realm of possibility. When you have a guy leading the GOP field talking about raising taxes and imposing tariffs, and the leader of the Democratic field led by someone who is under investigation for nearly everything; and who's biggest claim to fame is the Russian reset button, along with being the 1st lady at one time in her life. Then all I have to say is...............statistics mean very little until the ones that come out right before the election.
Wait till blue collar workers listen and hear that the republican wants to hose hedge fund managers, along with wanting to put tariffs on. That is worth 3 points by itself. Yes my friend, I always read your statistics when you post them, but in this election, at this time, they have never meant less for what will happen down the road.
