CNN on Benghazi committee: Immediate headline "GOP committee finds no wrongdoing by Clinton"

[Juan de Fuca]

If they had an ounce of truth they would have paraded it in front of the press and waved it in front of everyone's eyes. They didn't because they have nothing and never did. This was nothing more than a attempt to influence the election and if Democrats had not presented their report yesterday, you wouldn't have seen the Republican version for two or three more months.

At this point what does the death of an American Ambassador and three other Americans make?
Did I get that right?

How does that compare to the 5000+ dead U.S. military because of Bush's lies?

How many women have lost their lives due to Texas' unconstitutional extreme anti-abortion tactics? Should Texas officials be prosecuted for murder?

Maybe those 5,000 lives lost were about these lies.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 | Source

Obviously, the chicken had to lay the egg first, shorty! What was the SOURCE from which Kerry and Clinton got that information, hmmmmm?

"There is already a mountain of evidence that Saddam Hussein is gathering WMDs for the purpose of using them. And adding additional information is like adding a foot to Mount Everest."
--Ari Fleischer, Sept. 6, 2002 ~~http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Condoleezza_Rice_War_+_Peace.htm~~

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."
--Condoleezza Rice, Sept. 8, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"There's no debate in the world as to whether they have these weapons. We all know that. A trained ape knows that."
--Donald Rumsfeld, Sept. 13, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."
--President George W. Bush, Oct 6, 2002 CNN.com - Bush: Don't wait for mushroom cloud - Oct. 6, 2002

Bush, Cheney & Co. were on a very hard push in the early fall of 2002 to falsify a basis for an Iraq invasion to get the desired WPA AUMF out of Congress to do a little Nation building, shorty! That propaganda was fed directly to Senators like Kerry, Clinton, et al. If Congress, both House and Senate, believed the lies from the Bush administration, well that only proves the Bush/Cheney cabal were fucking good liars.

You are totally full of nonsense. Kerry and Clinton got their intel from the CIA, FBI and several other foreign intelligence agencies. The same place that Bush got his intel. I have several dozen more quotes from Democrats that say the same thing.

No, the DIA and CIA passed raw intel from "Curveball" who they never vetted and passed that information directly to senior policymakers in November 1999. That and the administration of George Bush giving any credibility to Ahmed Chalabi were the biggest intelligence mistakes in the run up to war.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

What's funny is how you take the evidence of two congressional investigations that prove you wrong, toss them into the waste can and then pretend that the Benghazi investigation is still going on. It's not, It's done its work it is over.

The Democrats' Benghazi report does not dispute what I posted, about how Al Qaeida - who Obama and Hillary sided with - was responsible for the attack and how Qaddafi's ex-forces had to rescue the Americans in Benghazi.

They do not dispute the fact that the vide , as Obama finally admitted, played no part in instigating the attack.

The Democrats' report's sole focus was on proclaiming Obama and Hillary did not do anything wrong. They failed to present any evidence, however, that they did anything RIGHT, either. That's hard to do when your 'allies' murder 4 Americans, to include the 1st US Ambassador to be murdered in over 30 years and when your Secretary of State fails so miserably to successfully accomplish her job of protecting the US Ambassador and other Americans.

The Obama administration along with Secretary Clinton and Ambassador Susan Rice were all absolved of wrongdoing by congress. You can't spin that and the Benghazi investigation by congress is over there will be no further investigation of any kind about Benghazi. It's done. They went home empty handed.

 

[TooTall]

At this point what does the death of an American Ambassador and three other Americans make?
Did I get that right?

How does that compare to the 5000+ dead U.S. military because of Bush's lies?

How many women have lost their lives due to Texas' unconstitutional extreme anti-abortion tactics? Should Texas officials be prosecuted for murder?

Maybe those 5,000 lives lost were about these lies.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 | Source

Obviously, the chicken had to lay the egg first, shorty! What was the SOURCE from which Kerry and Clinton got that information, hmmmmm?

"There is already a mountain of evidence that Saddam Hussein is gathering WMDs for the purpose of using them. And adding additional information is like adding a foot to Mount Everest."
--Ari Fleischer, Sept. 6, 2002 ~~http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Condoleezza_Rice_War_+_Peace.htm~~

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."
--Condoleezza Rice, Sept. 8, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"There's no debate in the world as to whether they have these weapons. We all know that. A trained ape knows that."
--Donald Rumsfeld, Sept. 13, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."
--President George W. Bush, Oct 6, 2002 CNN.com - Bush: Don't wait for mushroom cloud - Oct. 6, 2002

Bush, Cheney & Co. were on a very hard push in the early fall of 2002 to falsify a basis for an Iraq invasion to get the desired WPA AUMF out of Congress to do a little Nation building, shorty! That propaganda was fed directly to Senators like Kerry, Clinton, et al. If Congress, both House and Senate, believed the lies from the Bush administration, well that only proves the Bush/Cheney cabal were fucking good liars.

You are totally full of nonsense. Kerry and Clinton got their intel from the CIA, FBI and several other foreign intelligence agencies. The same place that Bush got his intel. I have several dozen more quotes from Democrats that say the same thing.

No, the DIA and CIA passed raw intel from "Curveball" who they never vetted and passed that information directly to senior policymakers in November 1999. That and the administration of George Bush giving any credibility to Ahmed Chalabi were the biggest intelligence mistakes in the run up to war.

All of these quotes are 3 and 4 years later. Don't you think they updated the intel in that many years?

 

[Juan de Fuca]

How does that compare to the 5000+ dead U.S. military because of Bush's lies?

How many women have lost their lives due to Texas' unconstitutional extreme anti-abortion tactics? Should Texas officials be prosecuted for murder?

Maybe those 5,000 lives lost were about these lies.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 | Source

Obviously, the chicken had to lay the egg first, shorty! What was the SOURCE from which Kerry and Clinton got that information, hmmmmm?

"There is already a mountain of evidence that Saddam Hussein is gathering WMDs for the purpose of using them. And adding additional information is like adding a foot to Mount Everest."
--Ari Fleischer, Sept. 6, 2002 ~~http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Condoleezza_Rice_War_+_Peace.htm~~

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."
--Condoleezza Rice, Sept. 8, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"There's no debate in the world as to whether they have these weapons. We all know that. A trained ape knows that."
--Donald Rumsfeld, Sept. 13, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."
--President George W. Bush, Oct 6, 2002 CNN.com - Bush: Don't wait for mushroom cloud - Oct. 6, 2002

Bush, Cheney & Co. were on a very hard push in the early fall of 2002 to falsify a basis for an Iraq invasion to get the desired WPA AUMF out of Congress to do a little Nation building, shorty! That propaganda was fed directly to Senators like Kerry, Clinton, et al. If Congress, both House and Senate, believed the lies from the Bush administration, well that only proves the Bush/Cheney cabal were fucking good liars.

You are totally full of nonsense. Kerry and Clinton got their intel from the CIA, FBI and several other foreign intelligence agencies. The same place that Bush got his intel. I have several dozen more quotes from Democrats that say the same thing.

No, the DIA and CIA passed raw intel from "Curveball" who they never vetted and passed that information directly to senior policymakers in November 1999. That and the administration of George Bush giving any credibility to Ahmed Chalabi were the biggest intelligence mistakes in the run up to war.

All of these quotes are 3 and 4 years later. Don't you think they updated the intel in that many years?

That was one of the biggest issues that Democrats had with the way Bush handled Iraq. The 1999 information about "Curveball" wasn't even released to public view until 2005. They kept all of this information too close to their vest and kept public scrutiny out of it.

 

[TooTall]

What's funny is how you take the evidence of two congressional investigations that prove you wrong, toss them into the waste can and then pretend that the Benghazi investigation is still going on. It's not, It's done its work it is over.

The Democrats' Benghazi report does not dispute what I posted, about how Al Qaeida - who Obama and Hillary sided with - was responsible for the attack and how Qaddafi's ex-forces had to rescue the Americans in Benghazi.

They do not dispute the fact that the vide , as Obama finally admitted, played no part in instigating the attack.

The Democrats' report's sole focus was on proclaiming Obama and Hillary did not do anything wrong. They failed to present any evidence, however, that they did anything RIGHT, either. That's hard to do when your 'allies' murder 4 Americans, to include the 1st US Ambassador to be murdered in over 30 years and when your Secretary of State fails so miserably to successfully accomplish her job of protecting the US Ambassador and other Americans.

The Obama administration along with Secretary Clinton and Ambassador Susan Rice were all absolved of wrongdoing by congress. You can't spin that and the Benghazi investigation by congress is over there will be no further investigation of any kind about Benghazi. It's done. They went home empty handed.

Susan Rice was the Clinton and Obama spokesperson and told the same LIES about an obscure internet video and a spontaneous demonstration causing the Benghazi attack on 5 Sunday talk shows.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

What's funny is how you take the evidence of two congressional investigations that prove you wrong, toss them into the waste can and then pretend that the Benghazi investigation is still going on. It's not, It's done its work it is over.

The Democrats' Benghazi report does not dispute what I posted, about how Al Qaeida - who Obama and Hillary sided with - was responsible for the attack and how Qaddafi's ex-forces had to rescue the Americans in Benghazi.

They do not dispute the fact that the vide , as Obama finally admitted, played no part in instigating the attack.

The Democrats' report's sole focus was on proclaiming Obama and Hillary did not do anything wrong. They failed to present any evidence, however, that they did anything RIGHT, either. That's hard to do when your 'allies' murder 4 Americans, to include the 1st US Ambassador to be murdered in over 30 years and when your Secretary of State fails so miserably to successfully accomplish her job of protecting the US Ambassador and other Americans.

The Obama administration along with Secretary Clinton and Ambassador Susan Rice were all absolved of wrongdoing by congress. You can't spin that and the Benghazi investigation by congress is over there will be no further investigation of any kind about Benghazi. It's done. They went home empty handed.

Susan Rice was the Clinton and Obama spokesperson and told the same LIES about an obscure internet video and a spontaneous demonstration causing the Benghazi attack on 5 Sunday talk shows.

She sure was and the House Select Committee on Intelligence absolved her of that.

 

[TooTall]

Maybe those 5,000 lives lost were about these lies.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 | Source

Obviously, the chicken had to lay the egg first, shorty! What was the SOURCE from which Kerry and Clinton got that information, hmmmmm?

"There is already a mountain of evidence that Saddam Hussein is gathering WMDs for the purpose of using them. And adding additional information is like adding a foot to Mount Everest."
--Ari Fleischer, Sept. 6, 2002 ~~http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Condoleezza_Rice_War_+_Peace.htm~~

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."
--Condoleezza Rice, Sept. 8, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"There's no debate in the world as to whether they have these weapons. We all know that. A trained ape knows that."
--Donald Rumsfeld, Sept. 13, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."
--President George W. Bush, Oct 6, 2002 CNN.com - Bush: Don't wait for mushroom cloud - Oct. 6, 2002

Bush, Cheney & Co. were on a very hard push in the early fall of 2002 to falsify a basis for an Iraq invasion to get the desired WPA AUMF out of Congress to do a little Nation building, shorty! That propaganda was fed directly to Senators like Kerry, Clinton, et al. If Congress, both House and Senate, believed the lies from the Bush administration, well that only proves the Bush/Cheney cabal were fucking good liars.

You are totally full of nonsense. Kerry and Clinton got their intel from the CIA, FBI and several other foreign intelligence agencies. The same place that Bush got his intel. I have several dozen more quotes from Democrats that say the same thing.

No, the DIA and CIA passed raw intel from "Curveball" who they never vetted and passed that information directly to senior policymakers in November 1999. That and the administration of George Bush giving any credibility to Ahmed Chalabi were the biggest intelligence mistakes in the run up to war.

All of these quotes are 3 and 4 years later. Don't you think they updated the intel in that many years?

That was one of the biggest issues that Democrats had with the way Bush handled Iraq. The 1999 information about "Curveball" wasn't even released to public view until 2005. They kept all of this information too close to their vest and kept public scrutiny out of it.

Bush wasn't even in office until Jan 2001 and you are blaming him for something that happened in 1999. LMFAO.

 

[mudwhistle]

Some of the didn't

Some of them were hung.

BTW, you must be a foreigner. That explains some of the stupidity in your posts.

LOL,

Some of the didn't

Some of them were hung.

BTW, you must be a foreigner. That explains some of the stupidity in your posts.

Nope, not a foreigner, but I did live in London for a couple years. My family has been in America since before the Revolutionary War.

I lived in Germany for a couple of years, but I don't sound like a retard like you.

LOL, you should listen to yourself sometime. I thought you were an escapee from nurse Ratched.

I sound like that to an extremist.

Rational thought and logic are pretty strange to them.

\Sure, I understand how you think Nurse Ratched would be an extremist.

That goes without saying.

But I was talking about you. Before I started posting on message boards I didn't know idiots like you really existed.

 

[easyt65]

The Obama administration along with Secretary Clinton and Ambassador Susan Rice were all absolved of wrongdoing by congress.

This is a continuous, repeated LIE. The report spells out exactly what they did wrong, their incompetence, their poor decision-making, and their creation and reporting of a false story that was not based in fact - not taking into account direct reporting from personnel ON-SCENE.

The ONLY ones who have declared they have been cleared of any wrong-doing are Obama, Hillary, and the rabid liberals who are defending them. NO WHERE IN THE REPORT DOES IT SAY OBAMA AND HILLARY ARE ABSOLVED OF ANY WRONG-DOING.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

Obviously, the chicken had to lay the egg first, shorty! What was the SOURCE from which Kerry and Clinton got that information, hmmmmm?

"There is already a mountain of evidence that Saddam Hussein is gathering WMDs for the purpose of using them. And adding additional information is like adding a foot to Mount Everest."
--Ari Fleischer, Sept. 6, 2002 ~~http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Condoleezza_Rice_War_+_Peace.htm~~

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."
--Condoleezza Rice, Sept. 8, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"There's no debate in the world as to whether they have these weapons. We all know that. A trained ape knows that."
--Donald Rumsfeld, Sept. 13, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."
--President George W. Bush, Oct 6, 2002 CNN.com - Bush: Don't wait for mushroom cloud - Oct. 6, 2002

Bush, Cheney & Co. were on a very hard push in the early fall of 2002 to falsify a basis for an Iraq invasion to get the desired WPA AUMF out of Congress to do a little Nation building, shorty! That propaganda was fed directly to Senators like Kerry, Clinton, et al. If Congress, both House and Senate, believed the lies from the Bush administration, well that only proves the Bush/Cheney cabal were fucking good liars.

You are totally full of nonsense. Kerry and Clinton got their intel from the CIA, FBI and several other foreign intelligence agencies. The same place that Bush got his intel. I have several dozen more quotes from Democrats that say the same thing.

No, the DIA and CIA passed raw intel from "Curveball" who they never vetted and passed that information directly to senior policymakers in November 1999. That and the administration of George Bush giving any credibility to Ahmed Chalabi were the biggest intelligence mistakes in the run up to war.

All of these quotes are 3 and 4 years later. Don't you think they updated the intel in that many years?

That was one of the biggest issues that Democrats had with the way Bush handled Iraq. The 1999 information about "Curveball" wasn't even released to public view until 2005. They kept all of this information too close to their vest and kept public scrutiny out of it.

Bush wasn't even in office until Jan 2001 and you are blaming him for something that happened in 1999. LMFAO.

I'm just putting the facts out there. I also didn't put any blame for that on George Bush. I put the blame for Ahmad Chalabi on him.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

The Obama administration along with Secretary Clinton and Ambassador Susan Rice were all absolved of wrongdoing by congress.

This is a continuous, repeated LIE. The report spells out exactly what they did wrong, their incompetence, their poor decision-making, and their creation and reporting of a false story that was not based in fact - not taking into account direct reporting from personnel ON-SCENE.

The ONLY ones who have declared they have been cleared of any wrong-doing are Obama, Hillary, and the rabid liberals who are defending them. NO WHERE IN THE REPORT DOES IT SAY OBAMA AND HILLARY ARE ABSOLVED OF ANY WRONG-DOING.

LOL, if there was any of what you said was true there would have been indictments. The Benghazi committee went home empty handed with their heads lowered in shame. They got nothing after four years and $30 million dollars.

 

[TooTall]

What's funny is how you take the evidence of two congressional investigations that prove you wrong, toss them into the waste can and then pretend that the Benghazi investigation is still going on. It's not, It's done its work it is over.

The Democrats' Benghazi report does not dispute what I posted, about how Al Qaeida - who Obama and Hillary sided with - was responsible for the attack and how Qaddafi's ex-forces had to rescue the Americans in Benghazi.

They do not dispute the fact that the vide , as Obama finally admitted, played no part in instigating the attack.

The Democrats' report's sole focus was on proclaiming Obama and Hillary did not do anything wrong. They failed to present any evidence, however, that they did anything RIGHT, either. That's hard to do when your 'allies' murder 4 Americans, to include the 1st US Ambassador to be murdered in over 30 years and when your Secretary of State fails so miserably to successfully accomplish her job of protecting the US Ambassador and other Americans.

The Obama administration along with Secretary Clinton and Ambassador Susan Rice were all absolved of wrongdoing by congress. You can't spin that and the Benghazi investigation by congress is over there will be no further investigation of any kind about Benghazi. It's done. They went home empty handed.

Susan Rice was the Clinton and Obama spokesperson and told the same LIES about an obscure internet video and a spontaneous demonstration causing the Benghazi attack on 5 Sunday talk shows.

She sure was and the House Select Committee on Intelligence absolved her of that.

How did they absolve her of telling outright lies?

 

[TooTall]

The Obama administration along with Secretary Clinton and Ambassador Susan Rice were all absolved of wrongdoing by congress.

This is a continuous, repeated LIE. The report spells out exactly what they did wrong, their incompetence, their poor decision-making, and their creation and reporting of a false story that was not based in fact - not taking into account direct reporting from personnel ON-SCENE.

The ONLY ones who have declared they have been cleared of any wrong-doing are Obama, Hillary, and the rabid liberals who are defending them. NO WHERE IN THE REPORT DOES IT SAY OBAMA AND HILLARY ARE ABSOLVED OF ANY WRONG-DOING.

LOL, if there was any of what you said was true there would have been indictments. The Benghazi committee went home empty handed with their heads lowered in shame. They got nothing after four years and $30 million dollars.

Hilary said it was $7 million and the House does not indict anyone for crimes.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

What's funny is how you take the evidence of two congressional investigations that prove you wrong, toss them into the waste can and then pretend that the Benghazi investigation is still going on. It's not, It's done its work it is over.

The Democrats' Benghazi report does not dispute what I posted, about how Al Qaeida - who Obama and Hillary sided with - was responsible for the attack and how Qaddafi's ex-forces had to rescue the Americans in Benghazi.

They do not dispute the fact that the vide , as Obama finally admitted, played no part in instigating the attack.

The Democrats' report's sole focus was on proclaiming Obama and Hillary did not do anything wrong. They failed to present any evidence, however, that they did anything RIGHT, either. That's hard to do when your 'allies' murder 4 Americans, to include the 1st US Ambassador to be murdered in over 30 years and when your Secretary of State fails so miserably to successfully accomplish her job of protecting the US Ambassador and other Americans.

The Obama administration along with Secretary Clinton and Ambassador Susan Rice were all absolved of wrongdoing by congress. You can't spin that and the Benghazi investigation by congress is over there will be no further investigation of any kind about Benghazi. It's done. They went home empty handed.

Susan Rice was the Clinton and Obama spokesperson and told the same LIES about an obscure internet video and a spontaneous demonstration causing the Benghazi attack on 5 Sunday talk shows.

She sure was and the House Select Committee on Intelligence absolved her of that.

How did they absolve her of telling outright lies?

Learn something, they said the talking point process was flawed and nothing else. read the report. https://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf

 

[Juan de Fuca]

The Obama administration along with Secretary Clinton and Ambassador Susan Rice were all absolved of wrongdoing by congress.

This is a continuous, repeated LIE. The report spells out exactly what they did wrong, their incompetence, their poor decision-making, and their creation and reporting of a false story that was not based in fact - not taking into account direct reporting from personnel ON-SCENE.

The ONLY ones who have declared they have been cleared of any wrong-doing are Obama, Hillary, and the rabid liberals who are defending them. NO WHERE IN THE REPORT DOES IT SAY OBAMA AND HILLARY ARE ABSOLVED OF ANY WRONG-DOING.

LOL, if there was any of what you said was true there would have been indictments. The Benghazi committee went home empty handed with their heads lowered in shame. They got nothing after four years and $30 million dollars.

Hilary said it was $7 million and the House does not indict anyone.

The Trey Gowdy Committee spent $7 million, the other 7 investigations spent $22 million and there still isn't a full accounting of expenses.
The House can refer charges to the DOJ.

 

[easyt65]

LOL, if there was any of what you said was true there would have been indictments.

BS, and if you don't know it you should know it.

The only way anyone can be indicted is through the DOJ, OBAMA'S HANND-PICKED CORRUPT DOJ!

As pointed out earlier, this President has violated both Constitution and Laws, has ignored court orders, & been found in Contempt of court. His DOJ has protected AG Eric Holder from proven Perjury, for which he was sanctioned by a bi-partisan Congress. His DOJ is protecting and will continue to do so with Hillary.

This administration has refused to enforce laws and has run the most lawless administration in our nation's history.

 

[easyt65]

The Trey Gowdy Committee spent $7 million, the other 7 investigations spent $22 million and there still isn't a full accounting of expenses.

The State Department, as it was recently proven, hid subpoenaed documents for a year, and Obama refused to hand over documents. And none of what you provided shows in any way the report ever declared Obama and Hillary were exonerated of any wrong-doing.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

'CNN on Benghazi committee: Immediate headline "GOP committee finds no wrongdoing by Clinton"'

CNN is correct.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

The Obama administration along with Secretary Clinton and Ambassador Susan Rice were all absolved of wrongdoing by congress.

This is a continuous, repeated LIE. The report spells out exactly what they did wrong, their incompetence, their poor decision-making, and their creation and reporting of a false story that was not based in fact - not taking into account direct reporting from personnel ON-SCENE.

The ONLY ones who have declared they have been cleared of any wrong-doing are Obama, Hillary, and the rabid liberals who are defending them. NO WHERE IN THE REPORT DOES IT SAY OBAMA AND HILLARY ARE ABSOLVED OF ANY WRONG-DOING.

LOL, if there was any of what you said was true there would have been indictments. The Benghazi committee went home empty handed with their heads lowered in shame. They got nothing after four years and $30 million dollars.

Hilary said it was $7 million and the House does not indict anyone for crimes.

The Trey Gowdy Committee spent $7 million, the other 7 investigations spent $22 million and there still isn't a full accounting of expenses.

The State Department, as it was recently proven, hid subpoenaed documents for a year, and Obama refused to hand over documents. And none of what you provided shows in any way the report ever declared Obama and Hillary were exonerated of any wrong-doing.

Wow! All that and you still went home empty handed? You either have the most incompetent group of investigators in history or they didn't have anything the could turn into charges.

 

[easyt65]

'CNN on Benghazi committee: Immediate headline "GOP committee finds no wrongdoing by Clinton"'CNN is correct.

Because a rabid liberal says so...because CNN says so.

This is the same CNN that just got exposed for changing comments - falsifying what people said - to push their agenda and got busted for leaving out critical facts in a report that proved them wrong. CNN proved them selves recently to have no credibility.