CNN commentator calls for the elimination of Israel.

[georgephillip]

Which bigot earns your blessings?

Both are patriots, traitor

What definition of "patriot" are you using?

Trump didn't fight in Vietnam fifty years ago, and he doesn't pay income taxes today.

Netanyahu sells his office to the highest bidder.

How could either qualify as a patriot?

Rachel Maddow says he pays $40 million a year.

You calling Rachel a liar?

Sometime Rachel is a BIG liar.

I'm not sure she would have any way of knowing how much Trump pays in federal income taxes (if any)

Google maddow trump taxes and prove yourself wrong.

Are you writing about Fred or Donald Trump's taxes?
If you have a link claiming Donald pays $40 million a year in federal income taxes, post it.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Both are patriots, traitor

What definition of "patriot" are you using?

Trump didn't fight in Vietnam fifty years ago, and he doesn't pay income taxes today.

Netanyahu sells his office to the highest bidder.

How could either qualify as a patriot?

Rachel Maddow says he pays $40 million a year.

You calling Rachel a liar?

Sometime Rachel is a BIG liar.

I'm not sure she would have any way of knowing how much Trump pays in federal income taxes (if any)

Google maddow trump taxes and prove yourself wrong.

Are you writing about Fred or Donald Trump's taxes?
If you have a link claiming Donald pays $40 million a year in federal income taxes, post it.

Maddow Exclusive: Trump 2005 Tax Return Shows He Paid $38 Million On $150 Million Income

 

[georgephillip]

What definition of "patriot" are you using?

Trump didn't fight in Vietnam fifty years ago, and he doesn't pay income taxes today.

Netanyahu sells his office to the highest bidder.

How could either qualify as a patriot?

Rachel Maddow says he pays $40 million a year.

You calling Rachel a liar?

Sometime Rachel is a BIG liar.

I'm not sure she would have any way of knowing how much Trump pays in federal income taxes (if any)

Google maddow trump taxes and prove yourself wrong.

Are you writing about Fred or Donald Trump's taxes?
If you have a link claiming Donald pays $40 million a year in federal income taxes, post it.

Maddow Exclusive: Trump 2005 Tax Return Shows He Paid $38 Million On $150 Million Income

Rachel received those 2005 tax returns from David Cay Johnston, a journalist who has covered Trump since the 1980s:

The man behind Trump’s tax return

"Angered by the publication of his 2005 tax returns, President Donald Trump on Wednesday accused NBC News of broadcasting 'FAKE NEWS,' and took aim at David Cay Johnston, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist whose nonprofit journalism startup DCReport.org published the two-page tax return at the same time Johnston appeared on Rachel Maddow’s MSNBC program."

"'Does anybody really believe that a reporter, who nobody ever heard of, ‘went to his mailbox’ and found my tax returns?' Trump wrote on Twitter...."

"The MSNBC appearance surely raised Johnston’s national profile, but Johnston has been a prominent reporter in the tax world for decades.

"A former reporter at The New York Times, Johnston won a Pulitzer Prize in 2001 for his reporting on U.S. tax code loopholes that benefited corporations."

Johnston pointed out how almost all of Trump's tax payment of $38 million was due to the alternative minimum tax imposed on certain high worth individuals, corporations, and estates.

Without the ATM, Trump would have paid around $5 million on his $150 million income. It's been reported President Trump is in favor of abolishing the ATM.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Rachel Maddow says he pays $40 million a year.

You calling Rachel a liar?

Sometime Rachel is a BIG liar.

I'm not sure she would have any way of knowing how much Trump pays in federal income taxes (if any)

Google maddow trump taxes and prove yourself wrong.

Are you writing about Fred or Donald Trump's taxes?
If you have a link claiming Donald pays $40 million a year in federal income taxes, post it.

Maddow Exclusive: Trump 2005 Tax Return Shows He Paid $38 Million On $150 Million Income

Rachel received those 2005 tax returns from David Cay Johnston, a journalist who has covered Trump since the 1980s:

The man behind Trump’s tax return

"Angered by the publication of his 2005 tax returns, President Donald Trump on Wednesday accused NBC News of broadcasting 'FAKE NEWS,' and took aim at David Cay Johnston, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist whose nonprofit journalism startup DCReport.org published the two-page tax return at the same time Johnston appeared on Rachel Maddow’s MSNBC program."

"'Does anybody really believe that a reporter, who nobody ever heard of, ‘went to his mailbox’ and found my tax returns?' Trump wrote on Twitter...."

"The MSNBC appearance surely raised Johnston’s national profile, but Johnston has been a prominent reporter in the tax world for decades.

"A former reporter at The New York Times, Johnston won a Pulitzer Prize in 2001 for his reporting on U.S. tax code loopholes that benefited corporations."

Johnston pointed out how almost all of Trump's tax payment of $38 million was due to the alternative minimum tax imposed on certain high worth individuals, corporations, and estates.

Without the ATM, Trump would have paid around $5 million on his $150 million income. It's been reported President Trump is in favor of abolishing the ATM.

Lotta words to say I was right.

Surprised you couldn't find it. It's on youtube as well. See if you can look it up.

 

[Roudy]

Give the rest of questions a shot, dumbfuck

You're floundering badly on this thread.

Your ignorance is duly noted.

Al Nakba - PalestineRemix

"The battle for Palestine was lost by the Palestinians not in 1948 but in the late 1930s, because Britain completely smashed to the ground the Arab revolt and the Arab irregular forces."

Palestine had its own culture centuries before European Jews convinced England to back their ethnic cleansing efforts.

"In November 1947, the UN General Assembly proposed a plan to partition Palestine into a Jewish state and an Arab one. Jews in Palestine only constituted one-third of the population – most of whom had arrived from Europe a few years earlier – and only retained control of less than 5.5 percent of historic Palestine. Yet under the UN proposal, they were allocated 55 percent of the land. The Palestinians and their Arab allies rejected the proposal."

what "culture" was that?

Culture of Palestine - Wikipedia

"The Culture of Palestine is the culture of the Palestinian people, located across Historic Palestine as well as in the Palestinian diaspora. Palestinian culture is influenced by the many diverse cultures and religions which have existed in historic Palestine, from the early Canaanite period onward.

"Cultural contributions to the fields of art, literature, music, costume and cuisine express the Palestinian identity despite the geographical separation between the Palestinian territories, Palestinian citizens and the diaspora."

Your own Wikipedia link makes Swiss cheese out of your claims.

Jewish culture in Palestine.

"The King David Hotel bombing was a terrorist attack[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] carried out on Monday, July 22, 1946, by the militant right-wing[9] Zionist underground organization the Irgun on the British administrative headquarters for Palestine, which was housed in the southern wing[10] of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.[11][12][13]

"91 people of various nationalities were killed, and 46 were injured.[14]"
King David Hotel bombing - Wikipedia

They bombed the British military HQ to gain independence, not your beloved Arabs. You realize that the name "Palestinian" meant "Jew", prior to 1947. Palestinian is an invented identity the Arabs hijacked.

 

[irosie91]

yeah so? In 1946 my hubby was living in PALESTINE----his government
papers and passport issued by the brits designated him "PALESTINIAN"------He was born in a muslim/arab country. He was not designated "arab"-----if he was
a muslim born in that same muslim/arab country-----he would have been
designated on his passport "ARAB" ---not Palestinian. In 1946 the ONLY
people called "PALESTINIAN" were jews

What did the Brits gain from their "iron wall" in Palestine?

Divide and Conquer as Imperial Rules - FPIF

"Following the absorption of the Ottoman Empire after World War I, the British set about shoring up their rule by the tried and true strategy of pitting ethnic group against ethnic group, tribe against tribe, and religion against religion.

"When British Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour issued his famous 1917 Declaration guaranteeing a 'homeland' for the Jewish people in Palestine, he was less concerned with righting a two thousand year old wrong than creating divisions that would serve growing British interests in the Middle East.

"Sir Ronald Storrs, the first Governor of Jerusalem, certainly had no illusions about what a 'Jewish homeland' in Palestine meant for the British Empire: 'It will form for England,” he said, “a little loyal Jewish Ulster in a sea of potentially hostile Arabism.'

"Storrs’ analogy was no accident.

"Ireland was where the English invented the tactic of divide and conquer, and where the devastating effectiveness of using foreign settlers to drive a wedge between the colonial rulers and the colonized made it a template for worldwide imperial rule."

IPS Nazi propaganda----some things never change. For a really robust
program of divide and conquer--------try every muslim government in existence

 

[georgephillip]

Your ignorance is duly noted.

Al Nakba - PalestineRemix

"The battle for Palestine was lost by the Palestinians not in 1948 but in the late 1930s, because Britain completely smashed to the ground the Arab revolt and the Arab irregular forces."

Palestine had its own culture centuries before European Jews convinced England to back their ethnic cleansing efforts.

"In November 1947, the UN General Assembly proposed a plan to partition Palestine into a Jewish state and an Arab one. Jews in Palestine only constituted one-third of the population – most of whom had arrived from Europe a few years earlier – and only retained control of less than 5.5 percent of historic Palestine. Yet under the UN proposal, they were allocated 55 percent of the land. The Palestinians and their Arab allies rejected the proposal."

what "culture" was that?

Culture of Palestine - Wikipedia

"The Culture of Palestine is the culture of the Palestinian people, located across Historic Palestine as well as in the Palestinian diaspora. Palestinian culture is influenced by the many diverse cultures and religions which have existed in historic Palestine, from the early Canaanite period onward.

"Cultural contributions to the fields of art, literature, music, costume and cuisine express the Palestinian identity despite the geographical separation between the Palestinian territories, Palestinian citizens and the diaspora."

Your own Wikipedia link makes Swiss cheese out of your claims.

Jewish culture in Palestine.

"The King David Hotel bombing was a terrorist attack[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] carried out on Monday, July 22, 1946, by the militant right-wing[9] Zionist underground organization the Irgun on the British administrative headquarters for Palestine, which was housed in the southern wing[10] of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.[11][12][13]

"91 people of various nationalities were killed, and 46 were injured.[14]"
King David Hotel bombing - Wikipedia

They bombed the British military HQ to gain independence, not your beloved Arabs. You realize that the name "Palestinian" meant "Jew", prior to 1947. Palestinian is an invented identity the Arabs hijacked.

Palestine predates Judaism by more than a million years.

History of Palestine - Wikipedia

"The earliest human remains in Palestine were found in Ubeidiya, some 3 km south of the Sea of Galilee (Lake Tiberias), in the Jordan Rift Valley.

"The remains are dated to the Pleistocene, c. 1.5 million years ago.

"These are traces of the earliest migration of Homo erectus out of Africa. The site yielded hand axes of the Acheulean type.[12]

"Wadi El Amud between Safed and the Sea of Galilee was the site of the first prehistoric dig in Palestine, in 1925.

"The discovery of Palestine Man in the Zuttiyeh Cave in Wadi Al-Amud near Safed in 1925 provided some clues to human development in the area."

 

[georgephillip]

yeah so? In 1946 my hubby was living in PALESTINE----his government
papers and passport issued by the brits designated him "PALESTINIAN"------He was born in a muslim/arab country. He was not designated "arab"-----if he was
a muslim born in that same muslim/arab country-----he would have been
designated on his passport "ARAB" ---not Palestinian. In 1946 the ONLY
people called "PALESTINIAN" were jews

What did the Brits gain from their "iron wall" in Palestine?

Divide and Conquer as Imperial Rules - FPIF

"Following the absorption of the Ottoman Empire after World War I, the British set about shoring up their rule by the tried and true strategy of pitting ethnic group against ethnic group, tribe against tribe, and religion against religion.

"When British Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour issued his famous 1917 Declaration guaranteeing a 'homeland' for the Jewish people in Palestine, he was less concerned with righting a two thousand year old wrong than creating divisions that would serve growing British interests in the Middle East.

"Sir Ronald Storrs, the first Governor of Jerusalem, certainly had no illusions about what a 'Jewish homeland' in Palestine meant for the British Empire: 'It will form for England,” he said, “a little loyal Jewish Ulster in a sea of potentially hostile Arabism.'

"Storrs’ analogy was no accident.

"Ireland was where the English invented the tactic of divide and conquer, and where the devastating effectiveness of using foreign settlers to drive a wedge between the colonial rulers and the colonized made it a template for worldwide imperial rule."

IPS Nazi propaganda----some things never change. For a really robust
program of divide and conquer--------try every muslim government in existence

There would be no Jewish state in Palestine today without Churchill's "Black and Tans" a century ago.

Winston Churchill sent the Black and Tans to Palestine

"Winston Churchill sent the Black and Tans to Palestine
British politicians who waged war in Ireland used the same tactics and forces in Palestine - and a Dubliner was in charge during the Naqba"

"Douglas Duff had been stationed with the Black and Tans in Galway before moving to Palestine.

"His memoirs make clear that he brought a great deal of bigotry with him.

"Referring to the Palestinians of Haifa, he wrote: 'Most of us were so infected by the sense of our own superiority over these ‘lesser breeds’ that we scarcely regarded these people as human.'

"Officers who had served in Ireland played a prominent role in quelling protests by Palestinians against the expropriation of land where they lived and farmed. Raymond Cafferata, for example, had been part of the Auxiliaries during the Irish War of Independence.

"In 1933, he headed a contingent of foot police at a Jaffa demonstration which had been banned.

"A baton charge that he ordered was commended by British administration in Jerusalem for being 'magnificently executed' despite how numerous Palestinians were shot dead during the protest."

Do you think the Brits regarded the Jews of Palestine as a "lesser breed?"

 

[irosie91]

yeah so? In 1946 my hubby was living in PALESTINE----his government
papers and passport issued by the brits designated him "PALESTINIAN"------He was born in a muslim/arab country. He was not designated "arab"-----if he was
a muslim born in that same muslim/arab country-----he would have been
designated on his passport "ARAB" ---not Palestinian. In 1946 the ONLY
people called "PALESTINIAN" were jews

What did the Brits gain from their "iron wall" in Palestine?

Divide and Conquer as Imperial Rules - FPIF

"Following the absorption of the Ottoman Empire after World War I, the British set about shoring up their rule by the tried and true strategy of pitting ethnic group against ethnic group, tribe against tribe, and religion against religion.

"When British Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour issued his famous 1917 Declaration guaranteeing a 'homeland' for the Jewish people in Palestine, he was less concerned with righting a two thousand year old wrong than creating divisions that would serve growing British interests in the Middle East.

"Sir Ronald Storrs, the first Governor of Jerusalem, certainly had no illusions about what a 'Jewish homeland' in Palestine meant for the British Empire: 'It will form for England,” he said, “a little loyal Jewish Ulster in a sea of potentially hostile Arabism.'

"Storrs’ analogy was no accident.

"Ireland was where the English invented the tactic of divide and conquer, and where the devastating effectiveness of using foreign settlers to drive a wedge between the colonial rulers and the colonized made it a template for worldwide imperial rule."

IPS Nazi propaganda----some things never change. For a really robust
program of divide and conquer--------try every muslim government in existence

There would be no Jewish state in Palestine today without Churchill's "Black and Tans" a century ago.

Winston Churchill sent the Black and Tans to Palestine

"Winston Churchill sent the Black and Tans to Palestine
British politicians who waged war in Ireland used the same tactics and forces in Palestine - and a Dubliner was in charge during the Naqba"

"Douglas Duff had been stationed with the Black and Tans in Galway before moving to Palestine.

"His memoirs make clear that he brought a great deal of bigotry with him.

"Referring to the Palestinians of Haifa, he wrote: 'Most of us were so infected by the sense of our own superiority over these ‘lesser breeds’ that we scarcely regarded these people as human.'

"Officers who had served in Ireland played a prominent role in quelling protests by Palestinians against the expropriation of land where they lived and farmed. Raymond Cafferata, for example, had been part of the Auxiliaries during the Irish War of Independence.

"In 1933, he headed a contingent of foot police at a Jaffa demonstration which had been banned.

"A baton charge that he ordered was commended by British administration in Jerusalem for being 'magnificently executed' despite how numerous Palestinians were shot dead during the protest."

Do you think the Brits regarded the Jews of Palestine as a "lesser breed?"

you screwed it up again, Georgie------the BRITISH military buffoons were all over the Post World War I-----BRITISH controlled lands------in fact they controlled ADEN, YEMEN too. Is that why there is strife in Yemen?. In 1933 the ONLY PEOPLE THAT THE BRITS CALLED "PALESTINIANS"---were, IN FACT, Jews. British soldiers also whistled "waltzing Mathilda"
during the Aden Pogrom of 1947. Jerusalem? In 1933? lots of jews.
We need an Indian to tell us about the indifference of them military peace keepers when all hell broke out there too.

 

[Darkwind]

Don’t agree with what Hill said cant say I agree with him being fired over it either. I understand the outrage over what he said and the reasons for his firing even so firing people for saying things we find insulting or offensive is a slippery slope.

Not at all...when people lie or call for the deaths of others it must not be tolerated.

When you do this it allows the bar on what is protected speech to be narrowed more and more until eventually you have none. As has been stated more than once speech that everyone likes and agrees with doesn’t need protection when we go down this road it can happen to anyone even one of us.

You are coinfused............he crossed the line....as in free speech is protected (not nearly as much as it should be) but one is not allowed to shout fire in a crowded theater...and what he said was just as intolerable as shouting fire in a theater.

People get coinfused far too easily.

This is incorrect. I experimented with that concept a few years ago. I went into a theater and shouted fire.

Since the people in the theater knew by their senses that there was no smoke they concluded that there was no fire and My speech did not threaten them at all.

We simply cannot have restrictions on speech. Public opinion on speech, as long as no official action is taken to sanction someone for their speech, can be held against the person, but when we start acting as an insulted mob (a favored tactic of the left) we begin the destruction of our liberty.

 

[jasonnfree]

Time to cut Israel loose, let her fight her own battles. We supposedly can't afford low cost college and medical care for our own people but Israel takes care of their own while we subsidize it.

Healthcare in Israel - Wikipedia

Education in Israel - Wikipedia

 

[irosie91]

Don’t agree with what Hill said cant say I agree with him being fired over it either. I understand the outrage over what he said and the reasons for his firing even so firing people for saying things we find insulting or offensive is a slippery slope.

Not at all...when people lie or call for the deaths of others it must not be tolerated.

When you do this it allows the bar on what is protected speech to be narrowed more and more until eventually you have none. As has been stated more than once speech that everyone likes and agrees with doesn’t need protection when we go down this road it can happen to anyone even one of us.

You are coinfused............he crossed the line....as in free speech is protected (not nearly as much as it should be) but one is not allowed to shout fire in a crowded theater...and what he said was just as intolerable as shouting fire in a theater.

People get coinfused far too easily.

This is incorrect. I experimented with that concept a few years ago. I went into a theater and shouted fire.

Since the people in the theater knew by their senses that there was no smoke they concluded that there was no fire and My speech did not threaten them at all.

We simply cannot have restrictions on speech. Public opinion on speech, as long as no official action is taken to sanction someone for their speech, can be held against the person, but when we start acting as an insulted mob (a favored tactic of the left) we begin the destruction of our liberty.

windbag-----DON'T do it again------this time the people will assume ASSAULT RIFLE ATTACK

 

[Darkwind]

Don’t agree with what Hill said cant say I agree with him being fired over it either. I understand the outrage over what he said and the reasons for his firing even so firing people for saying things we find insulting or offensive is a slippery slope.

Not at all...when people lie or call for the deaths of others it must not be tolerated.

When you do this it allows the bar on what is protected speech to be narrowed more and more until eventually you have none. As has been stated more than once speech that everyone likes and agrees with doesn’t need protection when we go down this road it can happen to anyone even one of us.

You are coinfused............he crossed the line....as in free speech is protected (not nearly as much as it should be) but one is not allowed to shout fire in a crowded theater...and what he said was just as intolerable as shouting fire in a theater.

People get coinfused far too easily.

This is incorrect. I experimented with that concept a few years ago. I went into a theater and shouted fire.

Since the people in the theater knew by their senses that there was no smoke they concluded that there was no fire and My speech did not threaten them at all.

We simply cannot have restrictions on speech. Public opinion on speech, as long as no official action is taken to sanction someone for their speech, can be held against the person, but when we start acting as an insulted mob (a favored tactic of the left) we begin the destruction of our liberty.

windbag-----DON'T do it again------this time the people will assume ASSAULT RIFLE ATTACK

No, they won't. And I'll continue to act in the manner that seems appropriate to Me, thank you.

 

[irosie91]

Time to cut Israel loose, let her fight her own battles. We supposedly can't afford low cost college and medical care for our own people but Israel takes care of their own while we subsidize it.

Healthcare in Israel - Wikipedia

Education in Israel - Wikipedia

wrong again-----we do not subsidize either health care or education in
Israel

 

[georgephillip]

In 1933 the ONLY PEOPLE THAT THE BRITS CALLED "PALESTINIANS"---were, IN FACT, Jews. British soldiers also whistled "waltzing Mathilda"
during the Aden Pogrom of 1947. Jerusalem? In 1933? lots of jews.

One hundred years ago "the sun never set" on British racism.

'Racism is becoming more overt'

"Racism in the UK is becoming worse, says a black student subjected to racist abuse on social media.

"University College London student Nnenna Asubo received a message from a student at another university making 'monkey references'.

"When she challenged him, he said it was a joke and 'please don't lynch me'".

Are Brits reaping what they've sown?

 

[irosie91]

In 1933 the ONLY PEOPLE THAT THE BRITS CALLED "PALESTINIANS"---were, IN FACT, Jews. British soldiers also whistled "waltzing Mathilda"
during the Aden Pogrom of 1947. Jerusalem? In 1933? lots of jews.

One hundred years ago "the sun never set" on British racism.

'Racism is becoming more overt'

"Racism in the UK is becoming worse, says a black student subjected to racist abuse on social media.

"University College London student Nnenna Asubo received a message from a student at another university making 'monkey references'.

"When she challenged him, he said it was a joke and 'please don't lynch me'".

Are Brits reaping what they've sown?

brits are very racist-------what else is new?

 

[georgephillip]

wrong again-----we do not subsidize either health care or education in
Israel

Education in Israel - Wikipedia

"All of Israel's nine public universities, and some of its colleges, are subsidized by the government, and students pay only a small part of the actual cost of tuition.

"Students who completed military service are entitled to a 90% discount on their first-year tuition fees. Further financial assistance is provided by student loans, grants, and scholarships approved by the Ministry of Education.".

 

[irosie91]

wrong again-----we do not subsidize either health care or education in
Israel

Education in Israel - Wikipedia

"All of Israel's nine public universities, and some of its colleges, are subsidized by the government, and students pay only a small part of the actual cost of tuition.

"Students who completed military service are entitled to a 90% discount on their first-year tuition fees. Further financial assistance is provided by student loans, grants, and scholarships approved by the Ministry of Education.".

yeah so? very much the same as in the USA. By "WE" I was referring to -----WE USA CITIZENS

 

[georgephillip]

wrong again-----we do not subsidize either health care or education in
Israel

Education in Israel - Wikipedia

"All of Israel's nine public universities, and some of its colleges, are subsidized by the government, and students pay only a small part of the actual cost of tuition.

"Students who completed military service are entitled to a 90% discount on their first-year tuition fees. Further financial assistance is provided by student loans, grants, and scholarships approved by the Ministry of Education.".

yeah so? very much the same as in the USA. By "WE" I was referring to -----WE USA CITIZENS

Are you a citizen of Israel AND the USA?

 

[irosie91]

wrong again-----we do not subsidize either health care or education in
Israel

Education in Israel - Wikipedia

"All of Israel's nine public universities, and some of its colleges, are subsidized by the government, and students pay only a small part of the actual cost of tuition.

"Students who completed military service are entitled to a 90% discount on their first-year tuition fees. Further financial assistance is provided by student loans, grants, and scholarships approved by the Ministry of Education.".

yeah so? very much the same as in the USA. By "WE" I was referring to -----WE USA CITIZENS

Are you a citizen of Israel AND the USA?

no. Are you a member of both the democrat party and the Nazi party?
I served in the USA navy and spent lots of time trying to get sailors
about to leave the Navy TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE GI BILL