Clueless Socialist Twitter Morons Condemn Uganda For Doing What Twitter Did To Trump

[DBA]

"Twitter is openly condemning internet service providers blocking social media apps in the run-up to an election in Uganda as it takes criticism for alleged censorship on its own platform.

This was just days after they banned the President of the United States and removed or censored his top followers.

These people really are clueless."




'Hypocrite' doesn't just describe Pro-Socialist Twitter users, it should also be branded on Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey's forehead. The ass clown who says he has an obligation to censor and eliminate 'violence' and 'incitement of violence' supported violent Antifa and BLM burning down the business district in St. Louis ... TWICE:

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey at Ferguson riots in St. Louis before they burned down the business district a second time. Promoting violence was OK back in 2014.

Clueless Twitter Halfwits Condemn Uganda for Blocking App and Violating #OpenInternet Just Days After They Ban the President of United States and Remove His Top Followers

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey at Ferguson riots in St. Louis before they burned down the business district a second time. Promoting violence was OK back in 2014. Twitter is openly condemning internet service providers blocking social media apps in the run-up to an election in Uganda as it takes...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

What did Uganda do?

They think Uganda banning Twitter is the same thing as banning some idiot that cant conform to Twitters rules of conduct.

Uganda banned Twitter because Twitter was censoring political discourse in favor of one party. Sound familiar?

No it doesnt sound familiar. What other country banned Twitter?

LOL...they banned Twitter because Twitter was not playing fairly and was wrongfully influencing their election process in the way they saw fit. Sound familiar yet?

Thats their prerogative. Just like its Twitters prerogative to complain about it. What does that have to do with banning a user that didnt conform to Twitters rules of conduct while using the platform?

It goes well beyond that. Twitter is not applying its rules of conduct evenly. They pick and choose who they think is violating the rules based on political affiliation. That much is very clear. Not sure how section 230 applies to Twitter overseas, but if Twitter wants to unevenly apply their rules of conduct that is fine, but they should not longer have section 230 protection. Uganda decided they didn't want Twitter to help in deciding their election by disseminating information for only one side of the political spectrum, giving the other side a decided advantage.

 

[DBA]

Poland isn't banning social media....

They're just fining Twitter and Facebook $2.2 MILLION each time they catch them censoring one of Poland's citizens!!!!

WE NEED THIS IN U.S.: Every Time Facebook Or Twitter Censor Free Speech In Poland They Will Face $2.2 Million Fine' - WPolitics (worthypolitics.com)


A new law is due to be passed in Poland that would fine Big Tech firms a staggering $2.2 million every time they unconstitutionally censor lawful free speech online.

While liberal governments in western nations seek to fine social media giants Facebook and Twitter for failing to remove so-called “hate speech,” Poland is taking a refreshingly different approach.

“Under its provisions, social media services will not be allowed to remove content or block accounts if the content on them does not break Polish law.”


“In the event of removal or blockage, a complaint can be sent to the platform, which will have 24 hours to consider it.”

“Within 48 hours of the decision, the user will be able to file a petition to the court for the return of access. The court will consider complaints within seven days of receipt and the entire process is to be electronic.”


Polish Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro made clear that the legal initiative was designed to fight censorship.

Ziobro asserted that it wouldn’t impact the right of people who have been slandered or defamed to pursue justice.



This should be the model for all developed countries that value free speech, especially the United States.

The US should do the same, but we have too many lemmings who don't see the dangers of political censorship.

 

[Asclepias]

"Twitter is openly condemning internet service providers blocking social media apps in the run-up to an election in Uganda as it takes criticism for alleged censorship on its own platform.

This was just days after they banned the President of the United States and removed or censored his top followers.

These people really are clueless."




'Hypocrite' doesn't just describe Pro-Socialist Twitter users, it should also be branded on Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey's forehead. The ass clown who says he has an obligation to censor and eliminate 'violence' and 'incitement of violence' supported violent Antifa and BLM burning down the business district in St. Louis ... TWICE:

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey at Ferguson riots in St. Louis before they burned down the business district a second time. Promoting violence was OK back in 2014.

Clueless Twitter Halfwits Condemn Uganda for Blocking App and Violating #OpenInternet Just Days After They Ban the President of United States and Remove His Top Followers

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey at Ferguson riots in St. Louis before they burned down the business district a second time. Promoting violence was OK back in 2014. Twitter is openly condemning internet service providers blocking social media apps in the run-up to an election in Uganda as it takes...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

What did Uganda do?

They think Uganda banning Twitter is the same thing as banning some idiot that cant conform to Twitters rules of conduct.

Uganda banned Twitter because Twitter was censoring political discourse in favor of one party. Sound familiar?

No it doesnt sound familiar. What other country banned Twitter?

LOL...they banned Twitter because Twitter was not playing fairly and was wrongfully influencing their election process in the way they saw fit. Sound familiar yet?

Thats their prerogative. Just like its Twitters prerogative to complain about it. What does that have to do with banning a user that didnt conform to Twitters rules of conduct while using the platform?

It goes well beyond that. Twitter is not applying its rules of conduct evenly. They pick and choose who they think is violating the rules based on political affiliation. That much is very clear. Not sure how section 230 applies to Twitter overseas, but if Twitter wants to unevenly apply their rules of conduct that is fine, but they should not longer have section 230 protection. Uganda decided they didn't want Twitter to help in deciding their election by disseminating information for only one side of the political spectrum, giving the other side a decided advantage.

Nope. Its pretty simple. If you lie about the election and incite riots you're gone.

 

[DBA]

"Twitter is openly condemning internet service providers blocking social media apps in the run-up to an election in Uganda as it takes criticism for alleged censorship on its own platform.

This was just days after they banned the President of the United States and removed or censored his top followers.

These people really are clueless."




'Hypocrite' doesn't just describe Pro-Socialist Twitter users, it should also be branded on Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey's forehead. The ass clown who says he has an obligation to censor and eliminate 'violence' and 'incitement of violence' supported violent Antifa and BLM burning down the business district in St. Louis ... TWICE:

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey at Ferguson riots in St. Louis before they burned down the business district a second time. Promoting violence was OK back in 2014.

Clueless Twitter Halfwits Condemn Uganda for Blocking App and Violating #OpenInternet Just Days After They Ban the President of United States and Remove His Top Followers

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey at Ferguson riots in St. Louis before they burned down the business district a second time. Promoting violence was OK back in 2014. Twitter is openly condemning internet service providers blocking social media apps in the run-up to an election in Uganda as it takes...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

What did Uganda do?

They think Uganda banning Twitter is the same thing as banning some idiot that cant conform to Twitters rules of conduct.

Uganda banned Twitter because Twitter was censoring political discourse in favor of one party. Sound familiar?

No it doesnt sound familiar. What other country banned Twitter?

LOL...they banned Twitter because Twitter was not playing fairly and was wrongfully influencing their election process in the way they saw fit. Sound familiar yet?

Thats their prerogative. Just like its Twitters prerogative to complain about it. What does that have to do with banning a user that didnt conform to Twitters rules of conduct while using the platform?

It goes well beyond that. Twitter is not applying its rules of conduct evenly. They pick and choose who they think is violating the rules based on political affiliation. That much is very clear. Not sure how section 230 applies to Twitter overseas, but if Twitter wants to unevenly apply their rules of conduct that is fine, but they should not longer have section 230 protection. Uganda decided they didn't want Twitter to help in deciding their election by disseminating information for only one side of the political spectrum, giving the other side a decided advantage.

Nope. Its pretty simple. If you lie about the election and incite riots you're gone.

Completely untrue. Democrats incited plenty of riots and God knows they have lied about nearly everything and they are still there. I guess you missed that.

 

[TheParser]

"Twitter is openly condemning internet service providers blocking social media apps in the run-up to an election in Uganda as it takes criticism for alleged censorship on its own platform.

This was just days after they banned the President of the United States and removed or censored his top followers.

These people really are clueless."




'Hypocrite' doesn't just describe Pro-Socialist Twitter users, it should also be branded on Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey's forehead. The ass clown who says he has an obligation to censor and eliminate 'violence' and 'incitement of violence' supported violent Antifa and BLM burning down the business district in St. Louis ... TWICE:

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey at Ferguson riots in St. Louis before they burned down the business district a second time. Promoting violence was OK back in 2014.

Clueless Twitter Halfwits Condemn Uganda for Blocking App and Violating #OpenInternet Just Days After They Ban the President of United States and Remove His Top Followers

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey at Ferguson riots in St. Louis before they burned down the business district a second time. Promoting violence was OK back in 2014. Twitter is openly condemning internet service providers blocking social media apps in the run-up to an election in Uganda as it takes...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Let's be kind to Mr. D.

I had never heard of Mr. D. until I read your post. I could not care less about Twitter.

When I saw the photo, I was very much touched.

In his heart, Mr. D. probably thinks that he is a good person who is doing right.

And no doubt he loves being praised by his supporters for being such an enlightened Caucasian person.

Bless his little heart. (I hope that someone successfully sues Twitter out of business. I know, that will never happen.)