Clintons Refuse to Testify on Epstein Case

Zincwarrior

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2021
Messages
39,651
Reaction score
23,779
Points
1,788
Location
Central Texas
Please see this thread.
Update: Clintons refuse to testify.
Bill and Hillary Clinton refused on Tuesday to testify in the House’s Jeffrey Epstein investigation, escalating a monthslong battle with Representative James R. Comer, Republican of Kentucky, and effectively daring him to follow through on his threats to hold them in contempt of Congress.

ā€œEvery person has to decide when they have seen or had enough and are ready to fight for this country, its principles and its people, no matter the consequences,ā€ the Clintons wrote in a lengthy letter to Mr. Comer, which was obtained by The New York Times. ā€œFor us, now is that time.ā€
Thumbnail of page 1

Read the Clintons’ Personal Letter to Comer

Bill and Hillary Clinton wrote a lengthy letter to Representative James R. Comer of Kentucky, the Republican chairman of the Oversight Committee, refusing to testify in Congress.

Read Document 4 pages
Mr. Comer’s relentless efforts to force them to testify reflect his overall approach to his panel’s Epstein inquiry. As the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Mr. Comer has sought to shift the focus from President Trump’s ties to the convicted sex offender and his administration’s decision to close its investigation into the matter without releasing key information. Instead, he has sought to shift the spotlight onto prominent Democrats who once associated with Mr. Epstein and his longtime companion Ghislaine Maxwell.

Mr. Comer has repeatedly threatened to hold the Clintons in contempt if they failed to appear for live depositions behind closed doors, typically a first step in referring someone to the Justice Department for prosecution. He had set a deadline of Tuesday for Mr. Clinton to appear, and Wednesday for Mrs. Clinton.

But hours before the deadline, the Clintons made clear that they had no intention of presenting themselves on Capitol Hill to be questioned by Mr. Comer and members of his committee. They did so by submitting an eight-page legal letter laying out why they considered the subpoenas ā€œinvalid and legally unenforceable,ā€ then followed up with a scorching missive that they signed jointly, promising to fight Mr. Comer on the issue for as long as it took.

In the letter, the Clintons noted that they had proactively provided Mr. Comer with sworn statements similar to ones he had accepted from seven or eight other former law enforcement officials he had also subpoenaed and then excused from testifying before the committee. The Clintons have repeatedly said they have no knowledge relevant to the investigation.

But on Tuesday, they went further, publicly going to war against Mr. Comer on the matter with moves that appeared to lay the predicate for what could be a messy legal battle. In a letter that touched on Mr. Trump’s immigration crackdown, his use of the Justice Department to prosecute his enemies and even Republicans’ opposition to extending health care subsidies, the Clintons accused Mr. Comer of potentially bringing Congress to a halt to pursue a politically driven process ā€œliterally designed to result in our imprisonment.ā€

ā€œWe are confident that any reasonable person in or out of Congress will see, based on everything we release, that what you are doing is trying to punish those who you see as your enemies and to protect those you think are your friends,ā€ they wrote.

In the letter, the Clintons said they had anticipated that Mr. Comer would still direct his committee to seek to hold them in contempt, and they expected him to ā€œrelease irrelevant, decades-old photos that you hope will embarrass us.ā€
 
Good for them. I would think they are tired of Republicn bulshit. They have een out of the picture for years. They are old now. Leave them alone.
 
Please see this thread.
Update: Clintons refuse to testify.
Bill and Hillary Clinton refused on Tuesday to testify in the House’s Jeffrey Epstein investigation, escalating a monthslong battle with Representative James R. Comer, Republican of Kentucky, and effectively daring him to follow through on his threats to hold them in contempt of Congress.

ā€œEvery person has to decide when they have seen or had enough and are ready to fight for this country, its principles and its people, no matter the consequences,ā€ the Clintons wrote in a lengthy letter to Mr. Comer, which was obtained by The New York Times. ā€œFor us, now is that time.ā€
Thumbnail of page 1

Read the Clintons’ Personal Letter to Comer

Bill and Hillary Clinton wrote a lengthy letter to Representative James R. Comer of Kentucky, the Republican chairman of the Oversight Committee, refusing to testify in Congress.

Read Document 4 pages
Mr. Comer’s relentless efforts to force them to testify reflect his overall approach to his panel’s Epstein inquiry. As the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Mr. Comer has sought to shift the focus from President Trump’s ties to the convicted sex offender and his administration’s decision to close its investigation into the matter without releasing key information. Instead, he has sought to shift the spotlight onto prominent Democrats who once associated with Mr. Epstein and his longtime companion Ghislaine Maxwell.

Mr. Comer has repeatedly threatened to hold the Clintons in contempt if they failed to appear for live depositions behind closed doors, typically a first step in referring someone to the Justice Department for prosecution. He had set a deadline of Tuesday for Mr. Clinton to appear, and Wednesday for Mrs. Clinton.

But hours before the deadline, the Clintons made clear that they had no intention of presenting themselves on Capitol Hill to be questioned by Mr. Comer and members of his committee. They did so by submitting an eight-page legal letter laying out why they considered the subpoenas ā€œinvalid and legally unenforceable,ā€ then followed up with a scorching missive that they signed jointly, promising to fight Mr. Comer on the issue for as long as it took.

In the letter, the Clintons noted that they had proactively provided Mr. Comer with sworn statements similar to ones he had accepted from seven or eight other former law enforcement officials he had also subpoenaed and then excused from testifying before the committee. The Clintons have repeatedly said they have no knowledge relevant to the investigation.

But on Tuesday, they went further, publicly going to war against Mr. Comer on the matter with moves that appeared to lay the predicate for what could be a messy legal battle. In a letter that touched on Mr. Trump’s immigration crackdown, his use of the Justice Department to prosecute his enemies and even Republicans’ opposition to extending health care subsidies, the Clintons accused Mr. Comer of potentially bringing Congress to a halt to pursue a politically driven process ā€œliterally designed to result in our imprisonment.ā€

ā€œWe are confident that any reasonable person in or out of Congress will see, based on everything we release, that what you are doing is trying to punish those who you see as your enemies and to protect those you think are your friends,ā€ they wrote.

In the letter, the Clintons said they had anticipated that Mr. Comer would still direct his committee to seek to hold them in contempt, and they expected him to ā€œrelease irrelevant, decades-old photos that you hope will embarrass us.ā€
so, a former president and former Secretary of Start are again thumbing their noses at congress.

and half of Congress is cheering?

is it any wonder our country is in the shape it's in?

(ps. I didn't approve of trump doing it either)
 
This will be the nail in the DNC's election coffin for the mid-terms.

Brings back memories of the Monica scandal when Bill and Hillary played the persecuted victim card and denied everything, with full support of Democrats.

Until . . .
 
Please see this thread.
Update: Clintons refuse to testify.
Bill and Hillary Clinton refused on Tuesday to testify in the House’s Jeffrey Epstein investigation, escalating a monthslong battle with Representative James R. Comer, Republican of Kentucky, and effectively daring him to follow through on his threats to hold them in contempt of Congress.

ā€œEvery person has to decide when they have seen or had enough and are ready to fight for this country, its principles and its people, no matter the consequences,ā€ the Clintons wrote in a lengthy letter to Mr. Comer, which was obtained by The New York Times. ā€œFor us, now is that time.ā€
Thumbnail of page 1

Read the Clintons’ Personal Letter to Comer

Bill and Hillary Clinton wrote a lengthy letter to Representative James R. Comer of Kentucky, the Republican chairman of the Oversight Committee, refusing to testify in Congress.

Read Document 4 pages
Mr. Comer’s relentless efforts to force them to testify reflect his overall approach to his panel’s Epstein inquiry. As the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Mr. Comer has sought to shift the focus from President Trump’s ties to the convicted sex offender and his administration’s decision to close its investigation into the matter without releasing key information. Instead, he has sought to shift the spotlight onto prominent Democrats who once associated with Mr. Epstein and his longtime companion Ghislaine Maxwell.

Mr. Comer has repeatedly threatened to hold the Clintons in contempt if they failed to appear for live depositions behind closed doors, typically a first step in referring someone to the Justice Department for prosecution. He had set a deadline of Tuesday for Mr. Clinton to appear, and Wednesday for Mrs. Clinton.

But hours before the deadline, the Clintons made clear that they had no intention of presenting themselves on Capitol Hill to be questioned by Mr. Comer and members of his committee. They did so by submitting an eight-page legal letter laying out why they considered the subpoenas ā€œinvalid and legally unenforceable,ā€ then followed up with a scorching missive that they signed jointly, promising to fight Mr. Comer on the issue for as long as it took.

In the letter, the Clintons noted that they had proactively provided Mr. Comer with sworn statements similar to ones he had accepted from seven or eight other former law enforcement officials he had also subpoenaed and then excused from testifying before the committee. The Clintons have repeatedly said they have no knowledge relevant to the investigation.

But on Tuesday, they went further, publicly going to war against Mr. Comer on the matter with moves that appeared to lay the predicate for what could be a messy legal battle. In a letter that touched on Mr. Trump’s immigration crackdown, his use of the Justice Department to prosecute his enemies and even Republicans’ opposition to extending health care subsidies, the Clintons accused Mr. Comer of potentially bringing Congress to a halt to pursue a politically driven process ā€œliterally designed to result in our imprisonment.ā€

ā€œWe are confident that any reasonable person in or out of Congress will see, based on everything we release, that what you are doing is trying to punish those who you see as your enemies and to protect those you think are your friends,ā€ they wrote.

In the letter, the Clintons said they had anticipated that Mr. Comer would still direct his committee to seek to hold them in contempt, and they expected him to ā€œrelease irrelevant, decades-old photos that you hope will embarrass us.ā€

The Clinton's should testify AFTER 47 has testified.
 
This will be the nail in the DNC's election coffin for the mid-terms.

Brings back memories of the Monica scandal when Bill and Hillary played the persecuted victim card and denied everything, with full support of Democrats.

Until . . .
Nothing will happen.

And the low rent slugs and illegal aliens who vote for this criminal Party won't care anyway.
 
So what? A Congressional subpoena and even the laws they pass now mean nothing. Ask Pam Bondi, who sits on the Epstein files.
 
15th post
That was executive privilege. Not out of the ordiinary.

Trump and his toadies are not claiming privilege. They are just telling the congress to **** off.
Sure. When someone has a "D" at the end of their name the wagons are circled

img_1_1766299114409.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom