Weapons need people to shoot them, and the security the State Department hired all bugged out. What could the maker of a video possibly contribute to a hearing about a terrorist attack?
Clinton to testify AGAIN on Benghazi...
- Thread starter JimH52
- Start date
Weapons need people to shoot them, and the security the State Department hired all bugged out. What could the maker of a video possibly contribute to a hearing about a terrorist attack?
Of course it did. Accepting that fact destroys your narrative about Obama and Clinton.
Obscure Film Mocking Muslim Prophet Sparks Anti-U.S. Protests in Egypt and Libya - NYTimes.com
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...rked-by-anti-muslim-video.html?ref=middleeast
It's ridiculous on the face of it to claim that the video had nothing to do with it.
How many of those protesters brought heavy mortors and AK-47's to their protests? Those that were at Benghazi and survived clearly stated it was a terrorist attack and there was no protest. So, you can shove your attempted re-write up your ass!
You said the video didn't cause a thing.
It didn't. The video was used as an excuse in some cases. It wasn't the reason, especially in Benghazi.
"On September 16, Libyan PresidentMohamed Magariafsaid that the attack on the U.S. consulate was planned months in advance, and further stated that "[t]he idea that this criminal and cowardly act was a spontaneous protest that just spun out of control is completely unfounded and preposterous. We firmly believe that this was a precalculated, preplanned attack that was carried out specifically to attack the U.S. consulate."
BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 58,499
- 17,537
- 2,180
Of course it did. Accepting that fact destroys your narrative about Obama and Clinton.
Obscure Film Mocking Muslim Prophet Sparks Anti-U.S. Protests in Egypt and Libya - NYTimes.com
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...rked-by-anti-muslim-video.html?ref=middleeast
It's ridiculous on the face of it to claim that the video had nothing to do with it.
How many of those protesters brought heavy mortors and AK-47's to their protests? Those that were at Benghazi and survived clearly stated it was a terrorist attack and there was no protest. So, you can shove your attempted re-write up your ass!
You said the video didn't cause a thing.
It didn't. The video was used as an excuse in some cases. It wasn't the reason, especially in Benghazi.
"On September 16, Libyan PresidentMohamed Magariafsaid that the attack on the U.S. consulate was planned months in advance, and further stated that "[t]he idea that this criminal and cowardly act was a spontaneous protest that just spun out of control is completely unfounded and preposterous. We firmly believe that this was a precalculated, preplanned attack that was carried out specifically to attack the U.S. consulate."
If it was an excuse for violence (and I believe it and the cartoons were), that is still a thing. Where is the evidence that it was planned months in advance like the Libyan President claimed?
Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2010
- 82,974
- 75,856
- 3,605
Why isn't all your anger directed toward them? Because it's a private security company, not a government one?
Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2010
- 82,974
- 75,856
- 3,605
Yes, because Libyan presidents have always been so trustworthy and truthful.Of course it did. Accepting that fact destroys your narrative about Obama and Clinton.
Obscure Film Mocking Muslim Prophet Sparks Anti-U.S. Protests in Egypt and Libya - NYTimes.com
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...rked-by-anti-muslim-video.html?ref=middleeast
It's ridiculous on the face of it to claim that the video had nothing to do with it.
How many of those protesters brought heavy mortors and AK-47's to their protests? Those that were at Benghazi and survived clearly stated it was a terrorist attack and there was no protest. So, you can shove your attempted re-write up your ass!
You said the video didn't cause a thing.
It didn't. The video was used as an excuse in some cases. It wasn't the reason, especially in Benghazi.
"On September 16, Libyan PresidentMohamed Magariafsaid that the attack on the U.S. consulate was planned months in advance, and further stated that "[t]he idea that this criminal and cowardly act was a spontaneous protest that just spun out of control is completely unfounded and preposterous. We firmly believe that this was a precalculated, preplanned attack that was carried out specifically to attack the U.S. consulate."
You just can't accept the real reason for the Benghazi attack. It destroys your narrative that it's all Obama's fault.
Well something is not right about it, or else the administration would not be stalling on the information that they are asking for.
We still don't have answers to several questions and the reasons they are giving is just a run around of excuses and using the blame game.
We still don't have answers to several questions and the reasons they are giving is just a run around of excuses and using the blame game.
Yes, because Libyan presidents have always been so trustworthy and truthful.Of course it did. Accepting that fact destroys your narrative about Obama and Clinton.
Obscure Film Mocking Muslim Prophet Sparks Anti-U.S. Protests in Egypt and Libya - NYTimes.com
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...rked-by-anti-muslim-video.html?ref=middleeast
It's ridiculous on the face of it to claim that the video had nothing to do with it.
How many of those protesters brought heavy mortors and AK-47's to their protests? Those that were at Benghazi and survived clearly stated it was a terrorist attack and there was no protest. So, you can shove your attempted re-write up your ass!
You said the video didn't cause a thing.
It didn't. The video was used as an excuse in some cases. It wasn't the reason, especially in Benghazi.
"On September 16, Libyan PresidentMohamed Magariafsaid that the attack on the U.S. consulate was planned months in advance, and further stated that "[t]he idea that this criminal and cowardly act was a spontaneous protest that just spun out of control is completely unfounded and preposterous. We firmly believe that this was a precalculated, preplanned attack that was carried out specifically to attack the U.S. consulate."
You just can't accept the real reason for the Benghazi attack. It destroys your narrative that it's all Obama's fault.
"If you like your healthcare plan, you can keep it, period."
My anger is aimed at the decisions made by State and Hillary to NOT close the Consulate after the British and the Red Cross had determined it to be to dangerous to stay in Benghazi. The very least State could have done was send in a reasonable number of US Marine Ebassy guards, since everyone but the State Department knew that 911 was a special day for the jihadists to attack Americans.
The Consulate had been attacked several months earlier, and it wasn't because of a video that nobody saw then either.
PaintMyHouse
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #129
One, Stevens turned down the Marines, twice, at the actual Embassy no less, and two, it was his call to be in Benghazi that day. And three, the guys who killed him are ultimately responsible for his death and somehow you keep missing that little fact.
Stevens didn't want a big security presence there, he felt it would show a lack of faith. He made a bad call, it happens.
- Banned
- #130
This is a lie but then PMH is a well known liar.
Stevens did not have the authority to accept or decline the offer for more security.
As General Ham stated it was a Defense Dept /State Dept issue.
The State Dept had already extended the security team twice before and nobody knows why hey did not extend it again.
- Banned
- #131
Why did the State Dept hire Lybian's this time?
PaintMyHouse
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #132
Because they wanted to use locals instead of looking like we lacked faith or were invading the damn country. It's in the reports, read them.
- Banned
- #133
Of course it did. Accepting that fact destroys your narrative about Obama and Clinton.
Obscure Film Mocking Muslim Prophet Sparks Anti-U.S. Protests in Egypt and Libya - NYTimes.com
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...rked-by-anti-muslim-video.html?ref=middleeast
It's ridiculous on the face of it to claim that the video had nothing to do with it.
Just another lie.
General Ham testified that there was NO "spontaneous demonstration" going on.
It's ridiculous that you Bammy Droids keep perpetuating this lie.
- Banned
- #134
I've read them all PMH...the point is Stevens did not participate in that decisions, those above him did.
Quit blaming a dead man for Hillary's failings.
- Banned
- #135
Pure projection Mr. Hyper Partisan.
PaintMyHouse
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #136
The hell he didn't. He was an Ambassador, not a Puppet. That was his show there friend.
And place the blame fairly where it belongs. It happened on her watch, that's about all.
- Banned
- #137
Not according to General Ham in his testimony before Congress....and frankly he has much more knowledge of how this works than you.
PaintMyHouse
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #138
No, he doesn't actually. He has his side of the story. The reports have all sides of the story, including why Stevens was there that day, which was his choice. No one died at the Embassy 400 miles away.
C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
"Clinton to testify AGAIN on Benghazi..."
For no valid reason whatsoever.
For no valid reason whatsoever.
- Banned
- #140
It was his Theater PMH, you need to educate yourself.
He was the Commander there so yes he knows everything that went on.
In fact he was the one reporting to Panetta everything that was happening.
You look very foolish crying NUH-UH!!!!
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Trump is adding anti-trans provisions to SAVE America Act- Started by C_Clayton_Jones
- Replies: 0
-
If Trump is serious about a unconditional surrender. Trump needs to study how we made Japan surrender in wwII.
- Started by Hurricanelover
- Replies: 1
-
Why Amgen’s CEO Just Dropped $18M into AMGN: A Bullish Signal?- Started by BellaJones
- Replies: 0
-
Another Epstein Islander exposed: Chairman of Nobel committee that awarded Obama the Peace Prize- Started by theHawk
- Replies: 2
