Climate Change Skeptics Eat Crow

[Si modo]

There are many peer-reviewed articles that purport to demonstrate a link between human activity and global warming

Is that true?

Provide them, I and others will examine them, and see if the science supports your interpretation of what you think they say.

Otherwise your saying that's what they say and that they exist is cheap talk.

It's called burden. It's yours.

 

[SAT]

There are many peer-reviewed articles that purport to demonstrate a link between human activity and global warming

Is that true?

Provide them, I and others will examine them, and see if the science supports your interpretation of what you think they say.

Otherwise your saying that's what they say and that they exist is cheap talk.

It's called burden. It's yours.

Your burden, at the moment, is to answer yes or no to my question.

 

[Si modo]

There are many peer-reviewed articles that purport to demonstrate a link between human activity and global warming

Is that true?

Provide them, I and others will examine them, and see if the science supports your interpretation of what you think they say.

Otherwise your saying that's what they say and that they exist is cheap talk.

It's called burden. It's yours.

Your burden, at the moment, is to answer yes or no to my question.

How would I answer a question with an unsupported premise?

Here's a similar question for you: Why do you hate America?

 

[gslack]

Seems astroturfing by environmental groups in Japan has become a real problem and looks like they may have legislation in the works against it...But thats later...LOL

 

[SAT]

Provide them, I and others will examine them, and see if the science supports your interpretation of what you think they say.

Otherwise your saying that's what they say and that they exist is cheap talk.

It's called burden. It's yours.

Your burden, at the moment, is to answer yes or no to my question.

How would I answer a question with an unsupported premiss?

Here's a similar question for you: Why do you hate America?

You must not understand the meaning of the word similar. Your question is an attempt at a personal attack. I am soliciting information from you.

I believe that there are numerous peer reviewed journal articles showing a link between human activity and global warming.

I am asking you to confirm or deny that there are numerous peer reviewed journal articles supporting a link between human activity and global warming.

Alternatively, say "I don't know".

Then we'll move on.

 

[Si modo]

Your burden, at the moment, is to answer yes or no to my question.

How would I answer a question with an unsupported premiss?

Here's a similar question for you: Why do you hate America?

You must not understand the meaning of the word similar. Your question is an attempt at a personal attack. I am soliciting information from you.

I believe that there are numerous peer reviewed journal articles showing a link between human activity and global warming.

I am asking you to confirm or deny that there are numerous peer reviewed journal articles supporting a link between human activity and global warming.

Alternatively, say "I don't know".

Then we'll move on.

You are "soliciting" a yes or no from me with a question that has an unsupported premise. That premise is in actually your unsupported claim: "There are peer reviewed studies showing that the current warming trend is human caused."


Asking questions with unsupported premises is not a clever way to attempt to shift your burden.

 

[SAT]

You are "soliciting" a yes or no from me with a question that has an unsupported premise. That premise is in actually your unsupported claim: "There are peer reviewed studies showing that the current warming trend is human caused."

Asking questions with unsupported premises is not a clever way to attempt to shift your burden.

At this point, we are not discussing the credibility of the articles. We are discussing their existence. [I made that clear in an earlier post.] Don't be nervous.

Are there such articles? Again, I am not asking if these article prove what they purport to prove. I am asking if such articles exist.

Again, yes, no, or I don't know are the choices.

 

[Si modo]

You are "soliciting" a yes or no from me with a question that has an unsupported premise. That premise is in actually your unsupported claim: "There are peer reviewed studies showing that the current warming trend is human caused."

Asking questions with unsupported premises is not a clever way to attempt to shift your burden.

At this point, we are not discussing the credibility of the articles. We are discussing their existence. [I made that clear in an earlier post.] Don't be nervous.

Are there such articles? Again, I am not asking if these article prove what they purport to prove. I am asking if such articles exist.

Again, yes, no, or I don't know are the choices.

It is not my burden to show them nor is it my burden to tell you they exist.

I will say, I have seen no science demonstrating the significance and/or magnitude of man made CO2 on any warming.

You claim you have. You want me to provide them, though. The burden is not mine. Cheap talk does not stand true if someone doesn't shoulder your burden, either.

That would be like me saying that you are a moron. You, naturally, would ask me to support that claim. Then, I would ask you if you admit that there are posts of yours clearly demonstrating that you are a moron.

Or, do you still want me to prove a void?

How old are you? I am just curious - no offense.

 

[SAT]

It is not my burden to show them nor is it my burden to tell you they exist.

I will say, I have seen no science demonstrating the significance and/or magnitude of man made CO2 on any warming.

You claim you have. You want me to provide them, though. The burden is not mine. Cheap talk does not stand true if someone doesn't shoulder your burden, either.

That would be like me saying that you are a moron. You, naturally, would ask me to support that claim. Then, I would ask you if you admit that there are posts of yours clearly demonstrating that you are a moron.

Or, do you still want me to prove a void?

How old are you? I am just curious - no offense.

I am not asking you to show them to me. I am asking you to admit that they exist.

Do these articles exist?

Yes, no, or I don't know are the choices.

 

[Si modo]

It is not my burden to show them nor is it my burden to tell you they exist.

I will say, I have seen no science demonstrating the significance and/or magnitude of man made CO2 on any warming.

You claim you have. You want me to provide them, though. The burden is not mine. Cheap talk does not stand true if someone doesn't shoulder your burden, either.

That would be like me saying that you are a moron. You, naturally, would ask me to support that claim. Then, I would ask you if you admit that there are posts of yours clearly demonstrating that you are a moron.

Or, do you still want me to prove a void?

How old are you? I am just curious - no offense.

I am not asking you to show them to me. I am asking you to admit that they exist.

Do these articles exist?

Yes, no, or I don't know are the choices.

Do you admit that there are posts of yours that clearly demonstrate that you are a moron?

Yes, No, or I don't know are the choices.







BTW. Have you noticed that you have yet to discuss actual science?

 

[SAT]

It is not my burden to show them nor is it my burden to tell you they exist.

I will say, I have seen no science demonstrating the significance and/or magnitude of man made CO2 on any warming.

You claim you have. You want me to provide them, though. The burden is not mine. Cheap talk does not stand true if someone doesn't shoulder your burden, either.

That would be like me saying that you are a moron. You, naturally, would ask me to support that claim. Then, I would ask you if you admit that there are posts of yours clearly demonstrating that you are a moron.

Or, do you still want me to prove a void?

How old are you? I am just curious - no offense.

I am not asking you to show them to me. I am asking you to admit that they exist.

Do these articles exist?

Yes, no, or I don't know are the choices.

Do you admit that there are posts of yours that clearly demonstrate that you are a moron?

Yes, No, or I don't know are the choices.







BTW. Have you noticed that you have yet to discuss actual science?

Do such peer reviewed articles exist?

Yes, no, or I don't know are the choices.

Please, no more attempts to distract and divert.

Do such articles exist?

 

[Si modo]

I am not asking you to show them to me. I am asking you to admit that they exist.

Do these articles exist?

Yes, no, or I don't know are the choices.

Do you admit that there are posts of yours that clearly demonstrate that you are a moron?

Yes, No, or I don't know are the choices.







BTW. Have you noticed that you have yet to discuss actual science?

Do such peer reviewed articles exist?

Yes, no, or I don't know are the choices.

Please, no more attempts to distract and divert.

Do such articles exist?

The fact that you cannot even recognize shifting the burden is amazing.

When you can understand the basics, try again.

State something, support it. That's the starting gate. It always is.

 

[SAT]

The fact that you cannot even recognize shifting the burden is amazing.

When you can understand the basics, try again.

State something, support it. That's the starting gate. It always is.

So you've been gassing on in this thread for days and for pages, and you don't even know if there are peer reviewed articles that claim that global warming is human caused.

That is an incredible admission.

 

[Si modo]

The fact that you cannot even recognize shifting the burden is amazing.

When you can understand the basics, try again.

State something, support it. That's the starting gate. It always is.

So you've been gassing on in this thread for days and for pages, and you don't even know if there are peer reviewed articles that claim that global warming is human caused.

That is an incredible admission.

I haven't admitted to much of anything.

You aren't ready to discuss science. That can't be more clear.

When you are, you know what to do.

 

[del]

There are many peer-reviewed articles that purport to demonstrate a link between human activity and global warming

Is that true?

if there are, you should have no trouble linking one up i would think.

is that true?

 

[Si modo]

There are many peer-reviewed articles that purport to demonstrate a link between human activity and global warming

Is that true?

if there are, you should have no trouble linking one up i would think.

is that true?

I was starting to think I was entering the Twilight Zone, here.

 

[del]

That isn't true. I've seen links to news stories, blogs, opinions, etc. from you and thunder-something.

That's not science.

I told you what science is. Peer-reviewed scientific journals, remember?

It is science, honey. It's reporting from those same peer-reviewed journals. But those are not available on line, and the information is over both of our heads.

So we use reputable sources, like the EPA link [which is not a blog], to show you what scientists say.

.... Show us your rebuttal of what has been posted from one poster after another.

When discussing science, I only consider the science. There is no point in rebutting an opinion or belief.

Well, no, you don't consider the science at all, and you certainly aren't relying on peer reviewed journals for your opinions on the subject. You don't discuss. You just repeat "correlation is not causation" and "show us the science" over and over again.

Pay attention. Rebut what has been posted with science. Show us the science that supports your claims.

you have two heads and neither one is capable of critical thinking?

bummer, dude.

i'd get a refund.

 

[Old Rocks]

Please post your peer reviewed rebuttals of AGS. Thanks.

When there actually is something to rebut, I will.

All there is are unsupported claims. Cheap talk.

(I assume "AGS" is a typo.)

An unsupported claim does not stand true simply because no one can 'prove' it untrue.

If that were the case, then my saying that you are a moron is true until you 'prove' that it is not true.

I have reviewed your findings and agree with you on all points...

So that's two reviews that correlate your hypotheses. I believe he must be a moron then..

By golly, G-vid, I do believe that you and Sis are peers.

 

[Old Rocks]

There are many peer-reviewed articles that purport to demonstrate a link between human activity and global warming

Is that true?

if there are, you should have no trouble linking one up i would think.

is that true?

I was starting to think I was entering the Twilight Zone, here.

LOL. Sis, you have been there a long time, haven't you noticed?

 

[SAT]

The fact that you cannot even recognize shifting the burden is amazing.

When you can understand the basics, try again.

State something, support it. That's the starting gate. It always is.

So you've been gassing on in this thread for days and for pages, and you don't even know if there are peer reviewed articles that claim that global warming is human caused.

That is an incredible admission.

I haven't admitted to much of anything.

You aren't ready to discuss science. That can't be more clear.

When you are, you know what to do.

You haven't admitted to much, that is true.

The reason for that? You don't know much.

I've seen some excellent posts in this thread, from folks who clearly understand science. Your answers to their posts are non-responsive, every single time.

I've asked you some really simple questions, such as "Is the Earth getting warmer", and "Are there articles that purport to show that the Earth is getting warmer because of human activity", and you wiggle like a worm on a hook.

So, your answer to "Are there journal articles-peer reviewed journal articles-on human caused global warming", your answer is "I don't know".

OK, I'll fill you in.

There are many such peer reviewed articles.

So my next questions is, can you show any peer reviewed articles rebutting AGW?

I look forward to your answer.