Clarence Thomas had a stepson in private school. Harlan Crow paid his tuition

[Nostra]

It IS Sotomayor

Liberal SCOTUS Justice Took $3M From Book Publisher, Didn’t Recuse From Its Cases - The Billings Report

SCOTUS justice Sotomayor refused to recuse herself in a case where one of the litigants paid her $3.6 million dollars.

billingsreport.com

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

So if this was Soros and Sotomayor you would have called for a public lynching.

Soros is an enemy of the US so your comparison is absurd

 

[struth]

If there is something illegal here pursue it if not get over it.

in demklan world it’s illegal for the mere fact Thomas is off their plantation.

 

[struth]

It IS Sotomayor

Liberal SCOTUS Justice Took $3M From Book Publisher, Didn’t Recuse From Its Cases - The Billings Report

SCOTUS justice Sotomayor refused to recuse herself in a case where one of the litigants paid her $3.6 million dollars.

billingsreport.com

ouch…and the demafasict say nothing.

 

[Nostra]

in demklan world it’s illegal for the mere fact Thomas is off their plantation.

The Hi-Tech Lynching 2.0

 

[pknopp]

pknopp any answers to the questions below?

The lefty hack writer claims the case was against "Trammel Crow Residential company" when in fact it was from a subsidiary that nobody would connect unless the attorneys for the plaintiff made the court aware of.

Here is the actual case:

04-528 WOMACK & HAMPTON ARCHITECTS, L.L.C V. METRIC HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL.


Now explain to the class how the hell Thomas was supposed to know this company was one of the dozens of subs of one of the dozens of Trammel Crow companies?

So since your hack lied you really have nothing. Did the entire court vote to not hear the case? Would Thomas' recusing himself have changed that decision? Was the lower court decision in favor or against Metric Holdings?

Got any answers to those questions, Simp?

He knew. Justices have a full staff that researches all of this stuff.

 

[Nostra]

He knew. Justices have a full staff that researches all of this stuff.

Your attempt to mind read isn't evidence.

Wanna answer these questions you keep dodging?


Now explain to the class how the hell Thomas was supposed to know this company was one of the dozens of subs of one of the dozens of Trammel Crow companies?

So since your hack lied you really have nothing. Did the entire court vote to not hear the case? Would Thomas' recusing himself have changed that decision? Was the lower court decision in favor or against Metric Holdings?

 

[struth]

The Hi-Tech Lynching 2.0

this is about 1356.00 when it comes to Thomas

The demaklan hates free men

 

[struth]

He knew. Justices have a full staff that researches all of this stuff.

even if he knew that some subsidiary was involved in that case…who cares?

what make makes you think clerks research what the plaintiffs are subsidiaries of? haha

 

[pknopp]

Your attempt to mind read isn't evidence.

Wanna answer these questions you keep dodging?


Now explain to the class how the hell Thomas was supposed to know this company was one of the dozens of subs of one of the dozens of Trammel Crow companies?

I answered that.

 

[Nostra]

I answered that.

No you didn't. You claimed you could read his mind, Simp.

Try again.

I note you keep dodging the other questions.

Face it, you brought some lefty hack who lied and got your ass handed to you.

 

[struth]

I answered that.

haha you made up something. Seriously what makes you think law clerks research what subsidiaries plantiffs or defendants are of??? what do you think a law clerk does???!

 

[pknopp]

No you didn't. You claimed you could read his mind, Simp.

Try again.

I note you keep dodging the other questions.

Face it, you brought some lefty hack who lied and got your ass handed to you.

Bite me. I answered the question and not how you falsely portrayed my answer.

 

[pknopp]

haha you made up something. Seriously what makes you think law clerks research what subsidiaries plantiffs or defendants are of??? what do you think a law clerk does???!

That is their job.

 

[struth]

Bite me. I answered the question and not how you falsely portrayed my answer.

you provided us your opinion not an answer…you haven’t even bothered to support your opinion

 

[struth]

That is their job.

hhhab no it’s not the job of a law clerk to look up what the parties are subsidiaries of

 

[Nostra]

Bite me. I answered the question and not how you falsely portrayed my answer.

Since we have established you have no answer to the first question, let's move on:


So since your hack lied you really have nothing. Did the entire court vote to not hear the case? Would Thomas' recusing himself have changed that decision? Was the lower court decision in favor or against Metric Holdings?

 

[pknopp]

hhhab no it’s not the job of a law clerk to look up what the parties are subsidiaries of

If you say so. More reasonable people understand what law clerks do.

 

[Nostra]

That is their job.

Show us where it says that in their job description.

 

[pknopp]

Show us where it says that in their job description.

Typically, the broad range of duties assigned to a law clerk includes conducting legal research, preparing bench memos, drafting orders and opinions, proofreading the judge's orders and opinions, verifying citations, communicating with counsel regarding case management and procedural requirements, and assisting the judge during courtroom proceedings.

Resources - Duties of Federal Law Clerks - OSCAR