Civil Rights Act enacted 1964..today

[Lumpy 1]

You gotta wonder how much longer the Democrat Party, their liberal captured media and race charlatans will get away with promoting racism to split Americans and the ends justify the means deceptions to win elections..

-------------------------


The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88–352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964) is a landmark piece of civil rights legislation in the United States[1] that outlawed major forms of discrimination against racial, ethnic, national and religious minorities, and women.[2] It ended unequal application of voter registration requirements and racial segregation in schools, at the workplace and by facilities that served the general public

Vote totals by Political Parties

Democratic Party: 152–96 (61–39%)
Republican Party: 138–34 (80–20%)

Cloture in the Senate:[17]

Democratic Party: 44–23 (66–34%)
Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)

The Senate version:[16]

Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)

The Senate version, voted on by the House:[16]

Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)
Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)


Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Moonglow]

So your saying that repubs do not discriminate and have no captured media?

 

[The Infidel]

So your saying that repubs do not discriminate and have no captured media?

Typical... point at others when youre coaught with pants down.

 

[Lumpy 1]

So your saying that repubs do not discriminate and have no captured media?

I'm saying...You gotta wonder how much longer the Democrat Party, their liberal captured media and race charlatans will get away with promoting racism to split Americans and the ends justify the means deceptions to win elections..

..... and sheesh...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

That's almost the identical bill Ike proposed in 1957 but "I'll have them ******* voting Democrat for the next 200 years" LBJ and Al Gore Sr. never let come to the Senate for a vote

Dems set it back 7 whole years

 

[Moonglow]

When will repubs?

 

[The Infidel]

When will repubs?

 

[TheOldSchool]

Republicans have been champions for minority rights for a hundred+ years. What happened to make people forget about/ignore that?

 

[The Infidel]

Republicans have been champions for minority rights for a hundred+ years. What happened to make people forget about/ignore that?

The public school system & idiots who believe the MSM propaganda... oh well, makes for some good fun laughing at Libtards.

 

[Moonglow]

Republicans have been champions for minority rights for a hundred+ years. What happened to make people forget about/ignore that?

They do not support the rights of gays.

 

[The Infidel]

Republicans have been champions for minority rights for a hundred+ years. What happened to make people forget about/ignore that?

They do not support the rights of gays.

Liar

 

[TheOldSchool]

Republicans have been champions for minority rights for a hundred+ years. What happened to make people forget about/ignore that?

They do not support the rights of gays.

That's one of the things! What else convinced members of minorities that republicans are against them?

 

[Lumpy 1]

Republicans have been champions for minority rights for a hundred+ years. What happened to make people forget about/ignore that?

They do not support the rights of gays.

You seem to be having a hard time staying on issue..straw grabber..

 

[Lumpy 1]

Well...

 

[katsteve2012]

Republicans have been champions for minority rights for a hundred+ years. What happened to make people forget about/ignore that?

There were SOME Republcans who were, just as there were Democrats. The Civil Rights Act voting was divided mostly by North and South, with the South as usual opposing progress.

The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7–87 * (7–93%)
Southern Republicans: 0–10 * (0–100%)
Northern Democrats: 145–9 * (94–6%)
Northern Republicans: 138–24 * (85–15%)


The Senate version:

Southern Democrats: 1–20 * (5–95%) (only Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)
Southern Republicans: 0–1 * (0–100%) (John Tower of Texas)

Northern Democrats: 45–1 * (98–2%) (only Robert Byrd of West Virginia voted against)
Northern Republicans: 27–5 * (84–16%)

 

[Lumpy 1]

Republicans have been champions for minority rights for a hundred+ years. What happened to make people forget about/ignore that?

There were SOME Republcans who were, just as there were Democrats. The Civil Rights Act voting was divided mostly by North and South, with the South as usual opposing progress.

The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7–87 * (7–93%)
Southern Republicans: 0–10 * (0–100%)
Northern Democrats: 145–9 * (94–6%)
Northern Republicans: 138–24 * (85–15%)


The Senate version:

Southern Democrats: 1–20 * (5–95%) (only Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)
Southern Republicans: 0–1 * (0–100%) (John Tower of Texas)

Northern Democrats: 45–1 * (98–2%) (only Robert Byrd of West Virginia voted against)
Northern Republicans: 27–5 * (84–16%)

Democrats would have you believe that all those Southern Democrats switched Political Parties...

 

[katsteve2012]

Republicans have been champions for minority rights for a hundred+ years. What happened to make people forget about/ignore that?

There were SOME Republcans who were, just as there were Democrats. The Civil Rights Act voting was divided mostly by North and South, with the South as usual opposing progress.

The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7–87 * (7–93%)
Southern Republicans: 0–10 * (0–100%)
Northern Democrats: 145–9 * (94–6%)
Northern Republicans: 138–24 * (85–15%)


The Senate version:

Southern Democrats: 1–20 * (5–95%) (only Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)
Southern Republicans: 0–1 * (0–100%) (John Tower of Texas)

Northern Democrats: 45–1 * (98–2%) (only Robert Byrd of West Virginia voted against)
Northern Republicans: 27–5 * (84–16%)

Democrats would have you believe that all those Southern Democrats switched Political Parties...

No one "has me believe" anything that I choose not to. The subject matter was the Civil Rights Act. And the fact is that neither Republicans nor Democrats could claim to be the national champions of support of the initiative.

During that era, and long prior to that era, the nation was strongly divided by northern and southern ideals and political parties were irrelevant.

 

[holston]

Civil Rights:

 

[Lumpy 1]

There were SOME Republcans who were, just as there were Democrats. The Civil Rights Act voting was divided mostly by North and South, with the South as usual opposing progress.

The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7–87 * (7–93%)
Southern Republicans: 0–10 * (0–100%)
Northern Democrats: 145–9 * (94–6%)
Northern Republicans: 138–24 * (85–15%)


The Senate version:

Southern Democrats: 1–20 * (5–95%) (only Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)
Southern Republicans: 0–1 * (0–100%) (John Tower of Texas)

Northern Democrats: 45–1 * (98–2%) (only Robert Byrd of West Virginia voted against)
Northern Republicans: 27–5 * (84–16%)

Democrats would have you believe that all those Southern Democrats switched Political Parties...

No one "has me believe" anything that I choose not to. The subject matter was the Civil Rights Act. And the fact is that neither Republicans nor Democrats could claim to be the national champions of support of the initiative.

During that era, and long prior to that era, the nation was strongly divided by northern and southern ideals and political parties were irrelevant.

As is standard procedure with Democrats, political party affiliations, of course, doesn't matter when the numbers expose their obvious racist past and voting record on this Act and many others.

Sure there's a north...south divide but that doesn't change the facts no matter how you seem to want to blur them...thanks for the laugh.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Republicans have been champions for minority rights for a hundred+ years. What happened to make people forget about/ignore that?

"I'll have them ******* voting Democrat for the next 200 years" -- LBJ