.
Sure. Why not? Fuck George Washington.
This is one of the best nations to live in which is why millions of people are entering our nation through the Mexican Border from all over the world.
Without George Washington this nation might not exist.
You are looking at our nation’s past history through the eyes of a modern person. Times change and attitudes change.
Washington was running a plantation. In those days large plantations had a working force of slaves. Slaves were not dirt cheap but there were no real alternatives in those days that plantation owners would have accepted. In order to be competitive, Washington’s Mount Vernon had to have slave workers. Otherwise he would have most likely went bankrupt.
Just how expensive were slaves? Expensive enough that most were were well treated.
I don't see here a cost breakdown based on skills, so here's a chart I made for a class a few years ago:
Average cost of a slave (of any age, sex, or condition) in 1850 = $ 400 ($11,300 in 2009 dollars)
Average cost of a slave (of any age, sex, or condition) in 1860 = $ 800 (#21,300 in 2009 dollars)
Cost of a prime field hand (18-30 year-old man) in 1850 = $ 1,200 ($34,000 in 2009 dollars)
Cost of a skilled slave (e.g. a blacksmith) in 1850 = $ 2,000 ($56,700 in 2009 dollars)
EDIT: Some have asked where these figures are from. They're data from the [Texas State Historical Association]
*********
How much are 2009 dollars (USD) worth today? This tool calculates the time value of money based on inflation and CPI historical data from the United States.
www.inflationtool.com
Value of 2009 US Dollars today
$100 in 2009 = $139.31 in 2022
********
Therefore a prime male field hand would cost $47,260 in today’s dollars.
********
So how did George Washington feel about his slaves?
en.wikipedia.org
George Washington (John Trumbull, 1780), with William Lee, Washington's enslaved personal servant
The history of George Washington and slavery reflects Washington's changing attitude toward enslavement. The preeminent Founding Father of the United Statesand a hereditary slaveowner, Washington became increasingly uneasy with it. Slavery was then a longstanding institution dating back over a century in Virginiawhere he lived; it was also longstanding in other American colonies and in world history. Washington's will provided for the immediate emancipation of one of his slaves, and additionally required his remaining 123 slaves to serve his wife and be freed no later than her death, so they ultimately became free one year after his death.…emphasis added
Black slavery was ingrained in the economic and social fabric of the Colony of Virginia where Washington grew up. A third generation slave-owner, at 11 years of age upon the death of his father in 1743, he inherited his first ten slaves. In adulthood his personal slaveholding grew through inheritance, purchase and the natural increase of children born into slavery. In 1759, he gained control of dowerslaves belonging to the Custis estate on his marriage to Martha Dandridge Custis. Washington's early attitudes to slavery reflected the prevailing Virginia planter views of the day and he initially demonstrated no moral qualms about the institution. In 1774, Washington publicly denounced the slave trade on moral grounds in the Fairfax Resolves. After the war, he expressed support for the abolition of slavery by a gradual legislative process, a view he shared widely but always in private, and he remained dependent on enslaved labor.
Washington had a strong work ethic and demanded the same from both hired workers and from the enslaved people who were forced to work at his command. He provided his enslaved population with basic food, clothing and accommodation comparable to general practice at the time, which was not always adequate, and with medical care. In return, he forced them to work diligently from sunrise to sunset over the six-day working week that was standard at the time. Some three-quarters of his enslaved workers labored in the fields, while the remainder worked at the main residence as domestic servants and artisans. They supplemented their diet by hunting, trapping, and growing vegetables in their free time, and bought extra rations, clothing and housewares with income from the sale of game and produce. They built their own community around marriage and family, though because Washington allocated the enslaved to farms according to the demands of the business generally without regard for their relationships, many husbands lived separately from their wives and children during the work week. Washington used both reward and punishment to manage his enslaved population, but was constantly disappointed when they failed to meet his exacting standards. A significant proportion of the enslaved population at the Mount Vernon estate resisted their enslavement by various means, such as theft to supplement food and clothing and to provide income, feigning illness, and escaping.…emphasis added.
[/i]As commander-in-chief of the
Continental Army in 1775, he initially refused to accept African-Americans, free or enslaved, into the ranks, but bowed to the demands of war, and thereafter led a racially integrated army. In 1778, Washington expressed moral aversion to selling some of his enslaved workers at a public venue or splitting their families. At war's end, Washington demanded without success that the British respect the preliminary
peace treaty which he said required return of escaped slaves without exception. His public statement on resigning his
commission, addressing challenges facing the new
confederation, made no explicit mention of slavery. Politically, Washington felt that the divisive issue of
American slavery threatened national cohesion, he never spoke publicly about it, and signed laws that protected slavery as well as laws that curtailed slavery.[/i]
**************
So in his day George Washington was quite advanced in his views on slavery and freed his slaves after both he and his wife died. Still he was far from perfect in his handling of his slaves
You are entitled to your opinion but be aware 250 years from now many of the opinions and views you hold today will be viewed in a negative light. I suspect we will be viewed as totally disgusting barbarians that far in the future.
www.theguardian.com
www.cnbc.com
www.npr.org
www.cbsnews.com
www.juancole.com
civilwarodyssey.blogspot.com
www.dw.com
