"Christian" with "you deserve rape" banner gets hit with baseball bat.

[LoneLaugher]

So anyone that says anything against Christianity (or anything else) is open season to be smacked with a bat? In this nation we have this thing called the First Amendment and it protects free speech. I don't agree with what he was saying and doing but I'll defend his right to say it.

If people want to abuse kids then they should expect a reaction.

So you're okay with banning Muslims?? Because raping little boys is acceptable in Islam as "play".

Mac1958 Go get em' Tiger!

 

[SassyIrishLass]

So anyone that says anything against Christianity (or anything else) is open season to be smacked with a bat? In this nation we have this thing called the First Amendment and it protects free speech. I don't agree with what he was saying and doing but I'll defend his right to say it.

And guano and Oldschool give Tammy the WINNER rating so clearly they too support silencing others with VIOLENCE.

Meh, those three probably have gay Skype sessions

 

[Tilly]

So anyone that says anything against Christianity (or anything else) is open season to be smacked with a bat? In this nation we have this thing called the First Amendment and it protects free speech. I don't agree with what he was saying and doing but I'll defend his right to say it.

If people want to abuse kids then they should expect a reaction.

"You deserve rape." Is that part of the Christian fundy political platform now?

as is beating people with bats, looting, rioting, destroying and cop killing is to the amoral left.

That's a dumb comment. But even if it were true, at least the left isn't hoping that you get raped.

But you approve of violence against people who say nasty things. You too are a leftie fascist.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

If he would not have left, that would have most likely been the end of that bible thumper.
That mob was just starting to feed off itself...

I went back to the video...I saw a black man talking to him when suddenly the preacher was struck with the bat... the black guy said Oh shit see that's what happens etc...I heard folks cheering that the man was struck which is wrong however no one launched follow up attacks ...
I hope that dude is OK one can be OK for a while however if the brain starts to swell inside the skull it can get dicey..it would not be surprising if he had a concussion...needs follow up medical check ...

 

[LoneLaugher]

The militant fag outlet that Tommy Taint used to bring us this lovely story also identifies statements such as "the bible says it's not okay to be gay" and "stop looking up naughty, naughty things as the internet" as "hate speech".

Lunatics bashing each others' brains out. Imagine if Tabitha had bashed a mullah. She'd be headless.

If she went to the ME she wouldn't even have to bash a mullah....off the building she would go

More for Mac1958

 

[Czernobog]

So anyone that says anything against Christianity (or anything else) is open season to be smacked with a bat? In this nation we have this thing called the First Amendment and it protects free speech. I don't agree with what he was saying and doing but I'll defend his right to say it.

TO THE BOLD: Why do so many people seem to not understand that the First Amendment "Right" to free speech is not a license to say anything one likes without fear of repercussion?

The First Amendment protects you from government interference in your ability to say what you'd like. Did cops come along, and arrest the guy for his hateful sign? No? Then his First Amendment rights were not violated.

The first Amendment does not protect you from the reactions of individuals. You want to say that my mother was a cheap whore, who fucked dogs, and goats on a regular basis? You have every right to say that - no one is going to arrest you for what you said. However, I, as a private citizen, am very much going to exercise my first amendment right to express my displeasure at your disparaging comments about my mother by punching you in the face. There is no "Constitutional Right" that protects you from the consequences of your choice to exercise your right to free speech by being a dick.

Now, should the lady that hit the guy with the bat be arrested for assault? Probably, as I'm sure she was. However, her subsequent arrest wasn't the important part of the story. The important part was that this jackass chose to exercise his first amendment right of free speech to be a dick, and it, properly, resulted in someone else exercising their first amendment right of self-expression, by bashing him over the head with a base-ball bat. maybe, in the future, instead of worrying if he can say what he wants, he might consider if he should say what he wants, without reflection of the possible reactions.

Just a thought...

Freedom of speech is freedom of speech...you may not like what is being said but it is an individual's right to say it w/o fear of being attacked or arrested. AMERICA!!!!!

Wrong. Freedom of speech does not protect you from the reaction of people; only the government. That's what you Constitutional whiners never seem to get. There is no protection for you from me, when you are being a dick. It will result in exactly the reaction that one would expect it to result in. The only protection you have is from government interference. The First Amendment protects you from attack, or arrest from the government, not from people you are offending.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

The fact remains, the guy was harmless. What was to be had by going over in confronting/assaulting him?
Except for showing the true nature of that mob... In the long run that mob is only a harm to themselves.

If a person in a Trump rally swings a fist and decks a person as that person is being escorted out ....does that mean we can place the label "mob" on all who where there ? there was also cheering by the way when that happened...

 

[SassyIrishLass]

So anyone that says anything against Christianity (or anything else) is open season to be smacked with a bat? In this nation we have this thing called the First Amendment and it protects free speech. I don't agree with what he was saying and doing but I'll defend his right to say it.

TO THE BOLD: Why do so many people seem to not understand that the First Amendment "Right" to free speech is not a license to say anything one likes without fear of repercussion?

The First Amendment protects you from government interference in your ability to say what you'd like. Did cops come along, and arrest the guy for his hateful sign? No? Then his First Amendment rights were not violated.

The first Amendment does not protect you from the reactions of individuals. You want to say that my mother was a cheap whore, who fucked dogs, and goats on a regular basis? You have every right to say that - no one is going to arrest you for what you said. However, I, as a private citizen, am very much going to exercise my first amendment right to express my displeasure at your disparaging comments about my mother by punching you in the face. There is no "Constitutional Right" that protects you from the consequences of your choice to exercise your right to free speech by being a dick.

Now, should the lady that hit the guy with the bat be arrested for assault? Probably, as I'm sure she was. However, her subsequent arrest wasn't the important part of the story. The important part was that this jackass chose to exercise his first amendment right of free speech to be a dick, and it, properly, resulted in someone else exercising their first amendment right of self-expression, by bashing him over the head with a base-ball bat. maybe, in the future, instead of worrying if he can say what he wants, he might consider if he should say what he wants, without reflection of the possible reactions.

Just a thought...

Freedom of speech is freedom of speech...you may not like what is being said but it is an individual's right to say it w/o fear of being attacked or arrested. AMERICA!!!!!

Wrong. Freedom of speech does not protect you from the reaction of people; only the government. that's what you Constitutional whiners never seem to get. There is no protection for you from me, when you are being a dick. It will result in exactly the reaction that one would expect it to result in. The only protection you have is from government interference. The First Amendment protects you fro attack, or arrest from the government, not from people you are offending.

Save it, you can't go around smacking people over what they say, hence freedom of speech

 

[Czernobog]

So anyone that says anything against Christianity (or anything else) is open season to be smacked with a bat? In this nation we have this thing called the First Amendment and it protects free speech. I don't agree with what he was saying and doing but I'll defend his right to say it.

TO THE BOLD: Why do so many people seem to not understand that the First Amendment "Right" to free speech is not a license to say anything one likes without fear of repercussion?

The First Amendment protects you from government interference in your ability to say what you'd like. Did cops come along, and arrest the guy for his hateful sign? No? Then his First Amendment rights were not violated.

The first Amendment does not protect you from the reactions of individuals. You want to say that my mother was a cheap whore, who fucked dogs, and goats on a regular basis? You have every right to say that - no one is going to arrest you for what you said. However, I, as a private citizen, am very much going to exercise my first amendment right to express my displeasure at your disparaging comments about my mother by punching you in the face. There is no "Constitutional Right" that protects you from the consequences of your choice to exercise your right to free speech by being a dick.

Now, should the lady that hit the guy with the bat be arrested for assault? Probably, as I'm sure she was. However, her subsequent arrest wasn't the important part of the story. The important part was that this jackass chose to exercise his first amendment right of free speech to be a dick, and it, properly, resulted in someone else exercising their first amendment right of self-expression, by bashing him over the head with a base-ball bat. maybe, in the future, instead of worrying if he can say what he wants, he might consider if he should say what he wants, without reflection of the possible reactions.

Just a thought...

Freedom of speech is freedom of speech...you may not like what is being said but it is an individual's right to say it w/o fear of being attacked or arrested. AMERICA!!!!!

Wrong. Freedom of speech does not protect you from the reaction of people; only the government. that's what you Constitutional whiners never seem to get. There is no protection for you from me, when you are being a dick. It will result in exactly the reaction that one would expect it to result in. The only protection you have is from government interference. The First Amendment protects you fro attack, or arrest from the government, not from people you are offending.

Save it, you can't go around smacking people over what they say, hence freedom of speech

Actually, you can, as the lady with the base-ball bat rather aptly proved.

 

[Rustic]

Do I feel sorry for the guy, not really. He definitely was a bit delusional but at the same time their behavior proved what he was saying, and their intolerance was much louder than his bible thumping...

 

[SassyIrishLass]

So anyone that says anything against Christianity (or anything else) is open season to be smacked with a bat? In this nation we have this thing called the First Amendment and it protects free speech. I don't agree with what he was saying and doing but I'll defend his right to say it.

TO THE BOLD: Why do so many people seem to not understand that the First Amendment "Right" to free speech is not a license to say anything one likes without fear of repercussion?

The First Amendment protects you from government interference in your ability to say what you'd like. Did cops come along, and arrest the guy for his hateful sign? No? Then his First Amendment rights were not violated.

The first Amendment does not protect you from the reactions of individuals. You want to say that my mother was a cheap whore, who fucked dogs, and goats on a regular basis? You have every right to say that - no one is going to arrest you for what you said. However, I, as a private citizen, am very much going to exercise my first amendment right to express my displeasure at your disparaging comments about my mother by punching you in the face. There is no "Constitutional Right" that protects you from the consequences of your choice to exercise your right to free speech by being a dick.

Now, should the lady that hit the guy with the bat be arrested for assault? Probably, as I'm sure she was. However, her subsequent arrest wasn't the important part of the story. The important part was that this jackass chose to exercise his first amendment right of free speech to be a dick, and it, properly, resulted in someone else exercising their first amendment right of self-expression, by bashing him over the head with a base-ball bat. maybe, in the future, instead of worrying if he can say what he wants, he might consider if he should say what he wants, without reflection of the possible reactions.

Just a thought...

Freedom of speech is freedom of speech...you may not like what is being said but it is an individual's right to say it w/o fear of being attacked or arrested. AMERICA!!!!!

Wrong. Freedom of speech does not protect you from the reaction of people; only the government. that's what you Constitutional whiners never seem to get. There is no protection for you from me, when you are being a dick. It will result in exactly the reaction that one would expect it to result in. The only protection you have is from government interference. The First Amendment protects you fro attack, or arrest from the government, not from people you are offending.

Save it, you can't go around smacking people over what they say, hence freedom of speech

Actually, you can, as the lady with the base-ball bat rather aptly proved.

Was she arrested for it you ignorant toad? Get lost with this nonsense

 

[WillowTree]

So anyone that says anything against Christianity (or anything else) is open season to be smacked with a bat? In this nation we have this thing called the First Amendment and it protects free speech. I don't agree with what he was saying and doing but I'll defend his right to say it.

TO THE BOLD: Why do so many people seem to not understand that the First Amendment "Right" to free speech is not a license to say anything one likes without fear of repercussion?

The First Amendment protects you from government interference in your ability to say what you'd like. Did cops come along, and arrest the guy for his hateful sign? No? Then his First Amendment rights were not violated.

The first Amendment does not protect you from the reactions of individuals. You want to say that my mother was a cheap whore, who fucked dogs, and goats on a regular basis? You have every right to say that - no one is going to arrest you for what you said. However, I, as a private citizen, am very much going to exercise my first amendment right to express my displeasure at your disparaging comments about my mother by punching you in the face. There is no "Constitutional Right" that protects you from the consequences of your choice to exercise your right to free speech by being a dick.

Now, should the lady that hit the guy with the bat be arrested for assault? Probably, as I'm sure she was. However, her subsequent arrest wasn't the important part of the story. The important part was that this jackass chose to exercise his first amendment right of free speech to be a dick, and it, properly, resulted in someone else exercising their first amendment right of self-expression, by bashing him over the head with a base-ball bat. maybe, in the future, instead of worrying if he can say what he wants, he might consider if he should say what he wants, without reflection of the possible reactions.

Just a thought...

Freedom of speech is freedom of speech...you may not like what is being said but it is an individual's right to say it w/o fear of being attacked or arrested. AMERICA!!!!!

Wrong. Freedom of speech does not protect you from the reaction of people; only the government. That's what you Constitutional whiners never seem to get. There is no protection for you from me, when you are being a dick. It will result in exactly the reaction that one would expect it to result in. The only protection you have is from government interference. The First Amendment protects you from attack, or arrest from the government, not from people you are offending.

So, if she hits him with a bat he is then justified to shoot her in self defense.

 

[Czernobog]

TO THE BOLD: Why do so many people seem to not understand that the First Amendment "Right" to free speech is not a license to say anything one likes without fear of repercussion?

The First Amendment protects you from government interference in your ability to say what you'd like. Did cops come along, and arrest the guy for his hateful sign? No? Then his First Amendment rights were not violated.

The first Amendment does not protect you from the reactions of individuals. You want to say that my mother was a cheap whore, who fucked dogs, and goats on a regular basis? You have every right to say that - no one is going to arrest you for what you said. However, I, as a private citizen, am very much going to exercise my first amendment right to express my displeasure at your disparaging comments about my mother by punching you in the face. There is no "Constitutional Right" that protects you from the consequences of your choice to exercise your right to free speech by being a dick.

Now, should the lady that hit the guy with the bat be arrested for assault? Probably, as I'm sure she was. However, her subsequent arrest wasn't the important part of the story. The important part was that this jackass chose to exercise his first amendment right of free speech to be a dick, and it, properly, resulted in someone else exercising their first amendment right of self-expression, by bashing him over the head with a base-ball bat. maybe, in the future, instead of worrying if he can say what he wants, he might consider if he should say what he wants, without reflection of the possible reactions.

Just a thought...

Freedom of speech is freedom of speech...you may not like what is being said but it is an individual's right to say it w/o fear of being attacked or arrested. AMERICA!!!!!

Wrong. Freedom of speech does not protect you from the reaction of people; only the government. that's what you Constitutional whiners never seem to get. There is no protection for you from me, when you are being a dick. It will result in exactly the reaction that one would expect it to result in. The only protection you have is from government interference. The First Amendment protects you fro attack, or arrest from the government, not from people you are offending.

Save it, you can't go around smacking people over what they say, hence freedom of speech

Actually, you can, as the lady with the base-ball bat rather aptly proved.

Was she arrested for it you ignorant toad? Get lost with this nonsense

Did it stop her from bashing him over the head?

 

[Czernobog]

So anyone that says anything against Christianity (or anything else) is open season to be smacked with a bat? In this nation we have this thing called the First Amendment and it protects free speech. I don't agree with what he was saying and doing but I'll defend his right to say it.

TO THE BOLD: Why do so many people seem to not understand that the First Amendment "Right" to free speech is not a license to say anything one likes without fear of repercussion?

The First Amendment protects you from government interference in your ability to say what you'd like. Did cops come along, and arrest the guy for his hateful sign? No? Then his First Amendment rights were not violated.

The first Amendment does not protect you from the reactions of individuals. You want to say that my mother was a cheap whore, who fucked dogs, and goats on a regular basis? You have every right to say that - no one is going to arrest you for what you said. However, I, as a private citizen, am very much going to exercise my first amendment right to express my displeasure at your disparaging comments about my mother by punching you in the face. There is no "Constitutional Right" that protects you from the consequences of your choice to exercise your right to free speech by being a dick.

Now, should the lady that hit the guy with the bat be arrested for assault? Probably, as I'm sure she was. However, her subsequent arrest wasn't the important part of the story. The important part was that this jackass chose to exercise his first amendment right of free speech to be a dick, and it, properly, resulted in someone else exercising their first amendment right of self-expression, by bashing him over the head with a base-ball bat. maybe, in the future, instead of worrying if he can say what he wants, he might consider if he should say what he wants, without reflection of the possible reactions.

Just a thought...

Freedom of speech is freedom of speech...you may not like what is being said but it is an individual's right to say it w/o fear of being attacked or arrested. AMERICA!!!!!

Wrong. Freedom of speech does not protect you from the reaction of people; only the government. That's what you Constitutional whiners never seem to get. There is no protection for you from me, when you are being a dick. It will result in exactly the reaction that one would expect it to result in. The only protection you have is from government interference. The First Amendment protects you from attack, or arrest from the government, not from people you are offending.

So, if she hits him with a bat he is then justified to shoot her in self defense.

Isn't that what you guys have been claiming all along? Isn't that what Zimmerman claimed with Trayvon Martin? "He was beating me up, so I shot him in the face,"

 

[Rustic]

If he would not have left, that would have most likely been the end of that bible thumper.
That mob was just starting to feed off itself...

I went back to the video...I saw a black man talking to him when suddenly the preacher was struck with the bat... the black guy said Oh shit see that's what happens etc...I heard folks cheering that the man was struck which is wrong however no one launched follow up attacks ...
I hope that dude is OK one can be OK for a while however if the brain starts to swell inside the skull it can get dicey..it would not be surprising if he had a concussion...needs follow up medical check ...

Which is why he left because he knew what was going to be the follow up, he could not get out of there fast enough...
Like a said the mob was just starting to feed off itself

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Freedom of speech is freedom of speech...you may not like what is being said but it is an individual's right to say it w/o fear of being attacked or arrested. AMERICA!!!!!

Wrong. Freedom of speech does not protect you from the reaction of people; only the government. that's what you Constitutional whiners never seem to get. There is no protection for you from me, when you are being a dick. It will result in exactly the reaction that one would expect it to result in. The only protection you have is from government interference. The First Amendment protects you fro attack, or arrest from the government, not from people you are offending.

Save it, you can't go around smacking people over what they say, hence freedom of speech

Actually, you can, as the lady with the base-ball bat rather aptly proved.

Was she arrested for it you ignorant toad? Get lost with this nonsense

Did it stop her from bashing him over the head?

Dude you're talking in circles and it offends me. Can I bash you over the head now? Stop with the nonsense already

 

[Czernobog]

Wrong. Freedom of speech does not protect you from the reaction of people; only the government. that's what you Constitutional whiners never seem to get. There is no protection for you from me, when you are being a dick. It will result in exactly the reaction that one would expect it to result in. The only protection you have is from government interference. The First Amendment protects you fro attack, or arrest from the government, not from people you are offending.

Save it, you can't go around smacking people over what they say, hence freedom of speech

Actually, you can, as the lady with the base-ball bat rather aptly proved.

Was she arrested for it you ignorant toad? Get lost with this nonsense

Did it stop her from bashing him over the head?

Dude you're talking in circles and it offends me. Can I bash you over the head now? Stop with the nonsense already

Ooo...implied threats from a big, bag anonymous internet troll. should I be skeered now? Feel free to piss up a rope.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Which is why he left because he knew what was going to be the follow up, he could not get out of there fast enough...
Like a said the mob was just starting to feed off itself

I hope he left to get some medical help..as to his preaching I would more call it "trolling for reactions"...none of that justifies his getting head knocked...

 

[Rustic]

The fact remains, the guy was harmless. What was to be had by going over in confronting/assaulting him?
Except for showing the true nature of that mob... In the long run that mob is only a harm to themselves.

If a person in a Trump rally swings a fist and decks a person as that person is being escorted out ....does that mean we can place the label "mob" on all who where there ? there was also cheering by the way when that happened...

Deflection noted
It looked to me there was one security guy there, you think he could've done anything about that mob?
No doubt him leaving saved his own life, even after he was thumped on the head he knew what was in store for him if he stayed...

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Save it, you can't go around smacking people over what they say, hence freedom of speech

Actually, you can, as the lady with the base-ball bat rather aptly proved.

Was she arrested for it you ignorant toad? Get lost with this nonsense

Did it stop her from bashing him over the head?

Dude you're talking in circles and it offends me. Can I bash you over the head now? Stop with the nonsense already

Ooo...implied threats from a big, bag anonymous internet troll. should I be skeered now? Feel free to piss up a rope.

One more stupid comment from you, toad and off to ignore you go. I got no time for your petty nonsense