Chris Matthews points out the stupidity of Antifa

[jc456]

If they did something worthy of celebration in their communities then that's fine, but don't make a statue of them sitting on a horse in their confederate uniform. Get a clue man, we all know what's going on

I seriously doubt you have any idea whatsoever about "what is going on" I can vouch for the fact you have no idea what happened in the civil war and reconstruction it is evident each time this subject comes up. They di what they had to do to try to keep as much of their homeland from being burned and their wives and children killed and raped as they could. Win or lose they did all they could to keep murdering vile disgusting scum invaders from taking what little they had from them. SO **** your taking down statues that stood for honor and valor, Not for any damn piece of shit Planter, they didn't fight in the war, they just took their money and caught a boat to some offshore kingdom and came back after to deal with the ******* carpetbaggers that were killing the freed slaves like slaughtering cattle. Your leftist scum narrative has about as much in common with truth as Norma Jean Baker has with Phyllis Ada Driver. The shit communist scum in the latest incarnation of antifa have nothing in common with ANY group of people who fought against hitler's murdering scum, in fact they are quite like them in most ways.

As interesting as your spun story about the civil war is, per this discussion it is irrelevant. I've heard the same type of accounts about the Nazis and hitler that justify what they did and paint them as heros. But for this situation we are talking about symbols that stand for a certain set of values. Like I said before if there is a statute of a community leader who happened to be with the confederate, who founded a school that's erected by his school, then I have no problem with that. But if he is in the town square wearing a military uniform, then that's a different story.

The simple facts that the Nazis and KKK rallied around one of these statues to fight for its preservation along with the history of erecting many of these statutes during Jim Crow as symbols to put Blacks in the place as they fought for their rights, it shows what many of these statues stand for, and those are not values that many Americans identify with

So are you saying that removing the symbols will help blacks? Now that the statues are down is hate resolved? What is your plan beyond the removal of history?

"Removing history" is such an over dramatic snowflake term. Makes me laugh when I hear y'all continue to use it. To answer your question, no of course moving or removing statues doesn't solve all our race problems, but it takes a stand and shows action against racist values, which we should all be able to unify around, especially after the events in Charolettsville. Instead of taking a unified stand against the Nazi and racist groups that are speaking out we embarrassingly fall into partisan arguments where people like you defend the statues on the side of the Nazi/KKK and try and turn the conversation towards the Left by attacking ANTIFA. You feed right into the agenda of the hate groups, and you were lead there by the careless words of our dear leader.

So why are you snowflakes tearing history apart? I condemn all hate groups including antifa. You?

 

[Slade3200]

If they did something worthy of celebration in their communities then that's fine, but don't make a statue of them sitting on a horse in their confederate uniform. Get a clue man, we all know what's going on

I seriously doubt you have any idea whatsoever about "what is going on" I can vouch for the fact you have no idea what happened in the civil war and reconstruction it is evident each time this subject comes up. They di what they had to do to try to keep as much of their homeland from being burned and their wives and children killed and raped as they could. Win or lose they did all they could to keep murdering vile disgusting scum invaders from taking what little they had from them. SO **** your taking down statues that stood for honor and valor, Not for any damn piece of shit Planter, they didn't fight in the war, they just took their money and caught a boat to some offshore kingdom and came back after to deal with the ******* carpetbaggers that were killing the freed slaves like slaughtering cattle. Your leftist scum narrative has about as much in common with truth as Norma Jean Baker has with Phyllis Ada Driver. The shit communist scum in the latest incarnation of antifa have nothing in common with ANY group of people who fought against hitler's murdering scum, in fact they are quite like them in most ways.

As interesting as your spun story about the civil war is, per this discussion it is irrelevant. I've heard the same type of accounts about the Nazis and hitler that justify what they did and paint them as heros. But for this situation we are talking about symbols that stand for a certain set of values. Like I said before if there is a statute of a community leader who happened to be with the confederate, who founded a school that's erected by his school, then I have no problem with that. But if he is in the town square wearing a military uniform, then that's a different story.

The simple facts that the Nazis and KKK rallied around one of these statues to fight for its preservation along with the history of erecting many of these statutes during Jim Crow as symbols to put Blacks in the place as they fought for their rights, it shows what many of these statues stand for, and those are not values that many Americans identify with

So are you saying that removing the symbols will help blacks? Now that the statues are down is hate resolved? What is your plan beyond the removal of history?

"Removing history" is such an over dramatic snowflake term. Makes me laugh when I hear y'all continue to use it. To answer your question, no of course moving or removing statues doesn't solve all our race problems, but it takes a stand and shows action against racist values, which we should all be able to unify around, especially after the events in Charolettsville. Instead of taking a unified stand against the Nazi and racist groups that are speaking out we embarrassingly fall into partisan arguments where people like you defend the statues on the side of the Nazi/KKK and try and turn the conversation towards the Left by attacking ANTIFA. You feed right into the agenda of the hate groups, and you were lead there by the careless words of our dear leader.

So why are you snowflakes tearing history apart? I condemn all hate groups including antifa. You?

I don't think history should be torn apart. I think statutes that represent confederate values can easily be moved to museums or modified in a way that reflect values that we can be proud of. I think if a statue was erected 80 years ago to signal a "**** you" to blacks then we can melt that ****** down and put a MLK statue in its place.

 

[jc456]

I seriously doubt you have any idea whatsoever about "what is going on" I can vouch for the fact you have no idea what happened in the civil war and reconstruction it is evident each time this subject comes up. They di what they had to do to try to keep as much of their homeland from being burned and their wives and children killed and raped as they could. Win or lose they did all they could to keep murdering vile disgusting scum invaders from taking what little they had from them. SO **** your taking down statues that stood for honor and valor, Not for any damn piece of shit Planter, they didn't fight in the war, they just took their money and caught a boat to some offshore kingdom and came back after to deal with the ******* carpetbaggers that were killing the freed slaves like slaughtering cattle. Your leftist scum narrative has about as much in common with truth as Norma Jean Baker has with Phyllis Ada Driver. The shit communist scum in the latest incarnation of antifa have nothing in common with ANY group of people who fought against hitler's murdering scum, in fact they are quite like them in most ways.

As interesting as your spun story about the civil war is, per this discussion it is irrelevant. I've heard the same type of accounts about the Nazis and hitler that justify what they did and paint them as heros. But for this situation we are talking about symbols that stand for a certain set of values. Like I said before if there is a statute of a community leader who happened to be with the confederate, who founded a school that's erected by his school, then I have no problem with that. But if he is in the town square wearing a military uniform, then that's a different story.

The simple facts that the Nazis and KKK rallied around one of these statues to fight for its preservation along with the history of erecting many of these statutes during Jim Crow as symbols to put Blacks in the place as they fought for their rights, it shows what many of these statues stand for, and those are not values that many Americans identify with

So are you saying that removing the symbols will help blacks? Now that the statues are down is hate resolved? What is your plan beyond the removal of history?

"Removing history" is such an over dramatic snowflake term. Makes me laugh when I hear y'all continue to use it. To answer your question, no of course moving or removing statues doesn't solve all our race problems, but it takes a stand and shows action against racist values, which we should all be able to unify around, especially after the events in Charolettsville. Instead of taking a unified stand against the Nazi and racist groups that are speaking out we embarrassingly fall into partisan arguments where people like you defend the statues on the side of the Nazi/KKK and try and turn the conversation towards the Left by attacking ANTIFA. You feed right into the agenda of the hate groups, and you were lead there by the careless words of our dear leader.

So why are you snowflakes tearing history apart? I condemn all hate groups including antifa. You?

I don't think history should be torn apart. I think statutes that represent confederate values can easily be moved to museums or modified in a way that reflect values that we can be proud of. I think if a statue was erected 80 years ago to signal a "**** you" to blacks then we can melt that ****** down and put a MLK statue in its place.

There's a difference between influential and proud. 600,000 citizens died and some of the statues are historic and define a time. You want MLK ask his family. We have holidays to define his time streets as well. Not sure your point.

 

[Slade3200]

As interesting as your spun story about the civil war is, per this discussion it is irrelevant. I've heard the same type of accounts about the Nazis and hitler that justify what they did and paint them as heros. But for this situation we are talking about symbols that stand for a certain set of values. Like I said before if there is a statute of a community leader who happened to be with the confederate, who founded a school that's erected by his school, then I have no problem with that. But if he is in the town square wearing a military uniform, then that's a different story.

The simple facts that the Nazis and KKK rallied around one of these statues to fight for its preservation along with the history of erecting many of these statutes during Jim Crow as symbols to put Blacks in the place as they fought for their rights, it shows what many of these statues stand for, and those are not values that many Americans identify with

So are you saying that removing the symbols will help blacks? Now that the statues are down is hate resolved? What is your plan beyond the removal of history?

"Removing history" is such an over dramatic snowflake term. Makes me laugh when I hear y'all continue to use it. To answer your question, no of course moving or removing statues doesn't solve all our race problems, but it takes a stand and shows action against racist values, which we should all be able to unify around, especially after the events in Charolettsville. Instead of taking a unified stand against the Nazi and racist groups that are speaking out we embarrassingly fall into partisan arguments where people like you defend the statues on the side of the Nazi/KKK and try and turn the conversation towards the Left by attacking ANTIFA. You feed right into the agenda of the hate groups, and you were lead there by the careless words of our dear leader.

So why are you snowflakes tearing history apart? I condemn all hate groups including antifa. You?

I don't think history should be torn apart. I think statutes that represent confederate values can easily be moved to museums or modified in a way that reflect values that we can be proud of. I think if a statue was erected 80 years ago to signal a "**** you" to blacks then we can melt that ****** down and put a MLK statue in its place.

There's a difference between influential and proud. 600,000 citizens died and some of the statues are historic and define a time. You want MLK ask his family. We have holidays to define his time streets as well. Not sure your point.

My point is that we can evaluate statues and monuments in a case by case basis. Some are historically relevant, some stand as anti-black confederate symbols. It would be like building a hitler monument in a Jewish neighborhood. Do you not understand that?

 

[The Original Tree]

Chris Matthews on Removing Statues of American Leaders: ‘Where Do We Stop?’

You know you're a wackadoodle movement when even the loons in your own party call you out for your bs.

I'm guessing Matthews isn't getting a tingle up his leg from this movement?

I thought ANTIFA was an anarchist movement. What makes you say it's a democrat cause?

It's not Anarchist, it's Communist, They practice Cultural Marxism as well, and their funding comes from George Soros. In fact, Soros has funded every paid riot to date since the election and is wanted in Russia and Hungary for funding the same kind of seditious acts, and attempts to subvert the governments of his host countries.

 

[The Original Tree]

So are you saying that removing the symbols will help blacks? Now that the statues are down is hate resolved? What is your plan beyond the removal of history?

"Removing history" is such an over dramatic snowflake term. Makes me laugh when I hear y'all continue to use it. To answer your question, no of course moving or removing statues doesn't solve all our race problems, but it takes a stand and shows action against racist values, which we should all be able to unify around, especially after the events in Charolettsville. Instead of taking a unified stand against the Nazi and racist groups that are speaking out we embarrassingly fall into partisan arguments where people like you defend the statues on the side of the Nazi/KKK and try and turn the conversation towards the Left by attacking ANTIFA. You feed right into the agenda of the hate groups, and you were lead there by the careless words of our dear leader.

So why are you snowflakes tearing history apart? I condemn all hate groups including antifa. You?

I don't think history should be torn apart. I think statutes that represent confederate values can easily be moved to museums or modified in a way that reflect values that we can be proud of. I think if a statue was erected 80 years ago to signal a "**** you" to blacks then we can melt that ****** down and put a MLK statue in its place.

There's a difference between influential and proud. 600,000 citizens died and some of the statues are historic and define a time. You want MLK ask his family. We have holidays to define his time streets as well. Not sure your point.

My point is that we can evaluate statues and monuments in a case by case basis. Some are historically relevant, some stand as anti-black confederate symbols. It would be like building a hitler monument in a Jewish neighborhood. Do you not understand that?

No one is going to let YOU & ANTIFA evaluate anything.

I have no issues with Putting such things on the ballot though.

 

[Slade3200]

"Removing history" is such an over dramatic snowflake term. Makes me laugh when I hear y'all continue to use it. To answer your question, no of course moving or removing statues doesn't solve all our race problems, but it takes a stand and shows action against racist values, which we should all be able to unify around, especially after the events in Charolettsville. Instead of taking a unified stand against the Nazi and racist groups that are speaking out we embarrassingly fall into partisan arguments where people like you defend the statues on the side of the Nazi/KKK and try and turn the conversation towards the Left by attacking ANTIFA. You feed right into the agenda of the hate groups, and you were lead there by the careless words of our dear leader.

So why are you snowflakes tearing history apart? I condemn all hate groups including antifa. You?

I don't think history should be torn apart. I think statutes that represent confederate values can easily be moved to museums or modified in a way that reflect values that we can be proud of. I think if a statue was erected 80 years ago to signal a "**** you" to blacks then we can melt that ****** down and put a MLK statue in its place.

There's a difference between influential and proud. 600,000 citizens died and some of the statues are historic and define a time. You want MLK ask his family. We have holidays to define his time streets as well. Not sure your point.

My point is that we can evaluate statues and monuments in a case by case basis. Some are historically relevant, some stand as anti-black confederate symbols. It would be like building a hitler monument in a Jewish neighborhood. Do you not understand that?

No one is going to let YOU & ANTIFA evaluate anything.

I have no issues with Putting such things on the ballot though.

Why am I in the same boat as ANTIFA? Thats a rather ignorant statement.

 

[Slade3200]

Chris Matthews on Removing Statues of American Leaders: ‘Where Do We Stop?’

You know you're a wackadoodle movement when even the loons in your own party call you out for your bs.

I'm guessing Matthews isn't getting a tingle up his leg from this movement?

I thought ANTIFA was an anarchist movement. What makes you say it's a democrat cause?

It's not Anarchist, it's Communist, They practice Cultural Marxism as well, and their funding comes from George Soros. In fact, Soros has funded every paid riot to date since the election and is wanted in Russia and Hungary for funding the same kind of seditious acts, and attempts to subvert the governments of his host countries.

I know you like to paint the commie picture but I'm not seeing it as accurate. While i'm sure there are some socialists and perhaps some communists in the ranks the over whelming message from ANTIFA has been an Anti - Racism, facism, capitalism, sexism etc. effort. They basically fight the far-right and follow an the actions that much closer resemble anarchy and protest. I haven't seen them pushing a political agenda or ideology so I don't know where you see them trying to institute a communistic political system, please link if you have evidence of that.

 

[blackhawk]

Chris Matthews on Removing Statues of American Leaders: ‘Where Do We Stop?’

You know you're a wackadoodle movement when even the loons in your own party call you out for your bs.

I'm guessing Matthews isn't getting a tingle up his leg from this movement?

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.