China’s Carbon Output Now Twice That of the Entire Developed World

[Weatherman2020]

Yet our elite who ban lawnmowers, refrigerators, stoves etc for you don’t utter a peep to push China to action.

Why it’s almost as if China is behind the whole global warming thing and our leaders are doing their bidding for them to destroy our economy.

Forget that. Not almost. It is it.

 

[EMH]

The Chinese Communist Party knows the answer to the question

Why did homO go SILENT for TWO YEARS on this issue...

It was the GREATEST EVER THREAT TO HUMANITY

Then TWO YEARS OF SILENCE

Then BACK to being GREATEST EVER THREAT

Then purchase BEACHFRONT PROPERTY on an island last hit by Cat 5 winds in 1938....

obama climate silence 2010 2012 - Google Search

Because the leaders of the CCP know what our DoJ is hiding, even if we do not...

Right HUNTER BIDEN!!!!

$10 million in "consulting fees" for WHAT?????

 

[Crick]

Yet our elite who ban lawnmowers, refrigerators, stoves etc for you don’t utter a peep to push China to action.

Why it’s almost as if China is behind the whole global warming thing and our leaders are doing their bidding for them to destroy our economy.

Forget that. Not almost. It is it.

Interesting active graphic there. The scale changes so that the top of the list never appears to change. Here are a few other ways to look at CO2 data:

(from the same org as yours)

You should like this one

China and India’s CO2 emissions, in context

Are China and India wildly outpacing the U.S., United Kingdom, Germany and Japan on emissions of carbon dioxide? A chart

www.politifact.com

This came from a PolitiFact Fact Check and was rated "Half-True". Note the vertical scale here. China and India in the last century were third world nations with CO2 emissions a tiny fraction of US emissions. Since then, both have modernized (read added enormous numbers of motor vehicles and homes with heating and AC) and industrialized. At the 1990 line, where the graph seems to show them all equal, the US was putting out more than twice as much CO2 as China. So, each of those bars actually has its own absolute scale.

When your graph ends in 2020, China is producing 2,912 MT CO2 per year versus the US's 1,286 MT; 226% greater.
However when your graph began, China was producing 125 MT while the US produced 813 MT, a 650% lead. And China didn't exceed US emissions till 2008. Regarding who is more responsible for global warming, you need to take into account that very long lifespan of CO2 in the atmosphere. Virtually every shred of CO2 emitted since 1850 is still present. So, let's compare cumulative numbers; what portion of the excess CO2 in our air and heating our planet has a "Made in America" label:

The complex calculus of apportioning CO2 emissions liability: Maguire

How to reduce global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions will be a major topic at the upcoming COP27 United Nations climate summit in Egypt next week.

www.reuters.com

Obviously, the world needs everyone, including both China, the US and all the other major emitters, to act as rapidly as they can to reduce and eventually end CO2 emissions. However, this constant effort to say "if China won't do it, we shouldn't do it" is precisely characterized by the analogy someone posted here in the last couple of days about two guys in a sinking boat. When one stops bailing, the other says "well, if you're not going to bail, I'm not either" If you do not see that and what that actually portends for the human future on this planet, you have allowed your biases and preconceptions to render your judgement that of a two year old.

 

[Oddball]

Interesting active graphic there. The scale changes so that the top of the list never appears to change. Here are a few other ways to look at CO2 data:

(from the same org as yours)

You should like this one

China and India’s CO2 emissions, in context

Are China and India wildly outpacing the U.S., United Kingdom, Germany and Japan on emissions of carbon dioxide? A chart

www.politifact.com

This came from a PolitiFact Fact Check and was rated "Half-True". Note the vertical scale here. China and India in the last century were third world nations with CO2 emissions a tiny fraction of US emissions. Since then, both have modernized (read added enormous numbers of motor vehicles and homes with heating and AC) and industrialized. At the 1990 line, where the graph seems to show them all equal, the US was putting out 6.6 times the CO2 of China. So, each of those bars actually has its own absolute scale.

When your graph ends in 2020, China is producing 2,912 MT CO2 per year versus the US's 1,286 MT; 226% greater.
However when the graph began, China was producing 125 MT while the US produced 813 MT, a 650% lead. And China didn't cross the US till 2008. Regarding who is more responsible for global warming, you need to take into account that very long lifespan of CO2 in the atmosphere. Virtually every shred of CO2 emitted since 1850 is still present. So, let's compare those numbers.

The complex calculus of apportioning CO2 emissions liability: Maguire

How to reduce global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions will be a major topic at the upcoming COP27 United Nations climate summit in Egypt next week.

www.reuters.com

Obviously, the world needs everyone, including both China, the US and all the other major emitters, to act as rapidly as they can to reduce and eventually end CO2 emissions. However, this constant effort to say "if China won't do it, we shouldn't do it" is precisely characterized by the analogy someone posted here in the last couple of days about two guys in a sinking boat. When one stops bailing, the other says "well, if you're not going to bail, I'm not either" If you do not see that and what that actually portends for the human future on this planet, you have allowed your biases and preconceptions to render your judgement that of a two year old.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Interesting active graphic there. The scale changes so that the top of the list never appears to change. Here are a few other ways to look at CO2 data:

(from the same org as yours)

You should like this one

China and India’s CO2 emissions, in context

Are China and India wildly outpacing the U.S., United Kingdom, Germany and Japan on emissions of carbon dioxide? A chart

www.politifact.com

This came from a PolitiFact Fact Check and was rated "Half-True". Note the vertical scale here. China and India in the last century were third world nations with CO2 emissions a tiny fraction of US emissions. Since then, both have modernized (read added enormous numbers of motor vehicles and homes with heating and AC) and industrialized. At the 1990 line, where the graph seems to show them all equal, the US was putting out 6.5 times the CO2 of China. So, each of those bars actually has its own absolute scale.

When your graph ends in 2020, China is producing 2,912 MT CO2 per year versus the US's 1,286 MT; 226% greater.
However when the graph began, China was producing 125 MT while the US produced 813 MT, a 650% lead. And China didn't cross the US till 2008. Regarding who is more responsible for global warming, you need to take into account that very long lifespan of CO2 in the atmosphere. Virtually every shred of CO2 emitted since 1850 is still present. So, let's compare those numbers.

The complex calculus of apportioning CO2 emissions liability: Maguire

How to reduce global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions will be a major topic at the upcoming COP27 United Nations climate summit in Egypt next week.

www.reuters.com

Obviously, the world needs everyone, including both China, the US and all the other major emitters, to act as rapidly as they can to reduce and eventually end CO2 emissions. However, this constant effort to say "if China won't do it, we shouldn't do it" is precisely characterized by the analogy someone posted here in the last couple of days about two guys in a sinking boat. When one stops bailing, the other says "well, if you're not going to bail, I'm not either" If you do not see that and what that actually portends for the human future on this planet, you have allowed your biases and preconceptions to render your judgement that of a two year old.

Per capital is a bigger fucking fraud that AGW in the first place.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The Per Capita Fraud is how you know the CCP is behind the AGW Scam

 

[Oddball]

The Per Capita Fraud is how you know the CCP is behind the AGW Scam

It's the stale old scam of the numbers grifters....

If the raw numbers don't support you, deflect with percentages....If the percentages don't support you, divert with raw numbers.

 

[Oddball]

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Interesting active graphic there. The scale changes so that the top of the list never appears to change. Here are a few other ways to look at CO2 data:

(from the same org as yours)

You should like this one

China and India’s CO2 emissions, in context

Are China and India wildly outpacing the U.S., United Kingdom, Germany and Japan on emissions of carbon dioxide? A chart

www.politifact.com

This came from a PolitiFact Fact Check and was rated "Half-True". Note the vertical scale here. China and India in the last century were third world nations with CO2 emissions a tiny fraction of US emissions. Since then, both have modernized (read added enormous numbers of motor vehicles and homes with heating and AC) and industrialized. At the 1990 line, where the graph seems to show them all equal, the US was putting out more than twice as much CO2 as China. So, each of those bars actually has its own absolute scale.

When your graph ends in 2020, China is producing 2,912 MT CO2 per year versus the US's 1,286 MT; 226% greater.
However when your graph began, China was producing 125 MT while the US produced 813 MT, a 650% lead. And China didn't exceed US emissions till 2008. Regarding who is more responsible for global warming, you need to take into account that very long lifespan of CO2 in the atmosphere. Virtually every shred of CO2 emitted since 1850 is still present. So, let's compare cumulative numbers; what portion of the excess CO2 in our air and heating our planet has a "Made in America" label:

The complex calculus of apportioning CO2 emissions liability: Maguire

How to reduce global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions will be a major topic at the upcoming COP27 United Nations climate summit in Egypt next week.

www.reuters.com

Obviously, the world needs everyone, including both China, the US and all the other major emitters, to act as rapidly as they can to reduce and eventually end CO2 emissions. However, this constant effort to say "if China won't do it, we shouldn't do it" is precisely characterized by the analogy someone posted here in the last couple of days about two guys in a sinking boat. When one stops bailing, the other says "well, if you're not going to bail, I'm not either" If you do not see that and what that actually portends for the human future on this planet, you have allowed your biases and preconceptions to render your judgement that of a two year old.

^ All the proof you ever need that The Climate Scam is all for the benefit of the CCP

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It's the stale old scam of the numbers grifters....

If the raw numbers don't support you, deflect with percentages....If the percentages don't support you, divert with raw numbers.

Now we know the IPCC hired Bernie Madoff's accountant

 

[jwoodie]

the analogy someone posted here in the last couple of days about two guys in a sinking boat. When one stops bailing, the other says "well, if you're not going to bail, I'm not either"

That is a stupid analogy. If two people bailing is required to keep the boat from sinking, then only one person bailing will not prevent the boat from sinking. And if the boat isn't really sinking, the person who keeps on bailing will collapse from exhaustion.

 

[Oddball]

Obviously, the world needs everyone, including both China, the US and all the other major emitters, to act as rapidly as they can to reduce and eventually end CO2 emissions. However, this constant effort to say "if China won't do it, we shouldn't do it" is precisely characterized by the analogy someone posted here in the last couple of days about two guys in a sinking boat. When one stops bailing, the other says "well, if you're not going to bail, I'm not either" If you do not see that and what that actually portends for the human future on this planet, you have allowed your biases and preconceptions to render your judgement that of a two year old.

Fucking idiotic analogy, as the others who are alleged to be bailing are actually poking more holes in the boat, while one guy is supposed to keep bailing.

It's little wonder that you liberoidals can't meme.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Interesting active graphic there. The scale changes so that the top of the list never appears to change. Here are a few other ways to look at CO2 data:

(from the same org as yours)

You should like this one

China and India’s CO2 emissions, in context

Are China and India wildly outpacing the U.S., United Kingdom, Germany and Japan on emissions of carbon dioxide? A chart

www.politifact.com

This came from a PolitiFact Fact Check and was rated "Half-True". Note the vertical scale here. China and India in the last century were third world nations with CO2 emissions a tiny fraction of US emissions. Since then, both have modernized (read added enormous numbers of motor vehicles and homes with heating and AC) and industrialized. At the 1990 line, where the graph seems to show them all equal, the US was putting out more than twice as much CO2 as China. So, each of those bars actually has its own absolute scale.

When your graph ends in 2020, China is producing 2,912 MT CO2 per year versus the US's 1,286 MT; 226% greater.
However when your graph began, China was producing 125 MT while the US produced 813 MT, a 650% lead. And China didn't exceed US emissions till 2008. Regarding who is more responsible for global warming, you need to take into account that very long lifespan of CO2 in the atmosphere. Virtually every shred of CO2 emitted since 1850 is still present. So, let's compare cumulative numbers; what portion of the excess CO2 in our air and heating our planet has a "Made in America" label:

The complex calculus of apportioning CO2 emissions liability: Maguire

How to reduce global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions will be a major topic at the upcoming COP27 United Nations climate summit in Egypt next week.

www.reuters.com

Obviously, the world needs everyone, including both China, the US and all the other major emitters, to act as rapidly as they can to reduce and eventually end CO2 emissions. However, this constant effort to say "if China won't do it, we shouldn't do it" is precisely characterized by the analogy someone posted here in the last couple of days about two guys in a sinking boat. When one stops bailing, the other says "well, if you're not going to bail, I'm not either" If you do not see that and what that actually portends for the human future on this planet, you have allowed your biases and preconceptions to render your judgement that of a two year old.

It’s the FACT that no one is even TRYING to push China into improving.

Which validates the point that this entire manmade global warming we need to act now is total BS intent on destroying the West.

And bad analogy. The people in the lifeboat are sitting back watching 5 people in the lifeboat drill holes in the hull.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Here's where the AGW Cult shows us that it's only the CO2 per capital that is melting the ice caps:

 

[Crick]

It's the stale old scam of the numbers grifters....

If the raw numbers don't support you, deflect with percentages....If the percentages don't support you, divert with raw numbers.

You seem to be criticizing the people on your side of this argument.

 

[Oddball]

You seem to be criticizing the people on your side of this argument.

No, I'm criticizing warmer shit posters like you.

You don't GAF about the emissions from China and India....Just admit it.

 

[Crick]

That is a stupid analogy. If two people bailing is required to keep the boat from sinking, then only one person bailing will not prevent the boat from sinking. And if the boat isn't really sinking, the person who keeps on bailing will collapse from exhaustion.

As hard as this is to believe, you may be overthinking this. The point is that bailing is in BOTH their best interests regardless of what the other fellow is doing.

 

[Crick]

No, I'm criticizing warmer shit posters like you.

You don't GAF about the emissions from China and India....Just admit it.

No. I do care about their emissions. I care about everyone's emissions because we ALL have to stop if this is going to work. What I don't like to hear is the ignorant, shortsighted and jingoistic proposition that we shouldn't have to do anything until they do. That is simply childish bullshit.

 

[ding]

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. ~crick and apu

 

[toobfreak]

China’s Carbon Output Now Twice That of the Entire Developed World​

Really makes US the suckers having the boob Biden slapping all of these useless restraints, restrictions and expenses on us which will do absolutely NOTHING for the planet so long as China and India crank it out like no tomorrow!