Child Announces That They're A Boy At LGBT Event

Child or not, he/she/it should have to grow up knowing that he/she/it is not a normal person.

I would not sit by and condone this person and tell them they're "brave" and "special." A freak should know that they're a freak.


Very true, I was just saying this is what they have been brainwashed to think and feel.
 
you have to be gentle with children..AND you have to be gentle with young men and women who have already been convinced by other unwitting adults to think they are what they want to believe..rather than what they truly are.

Those adults say...'yes..you must be YOU and them they proceed to tell them that they are something that they are not.
 
you have to be gentle with children..AND you have to be gentle with young men and women who have already been convinced by other unwitting adults to think they are what they want to believe..rather than what they truly are.

Those adults say...'yes..you must be YOU and them they proceed to tell them that they are something that they are not.


Exactly!
 

Child Announces That They're A Boy At LGBT Event​


Im-a-real-boy.webp
 
Somehow if I decided to announce that I was a cat at that age or not, I don't think that I would get the same reaction. (It says that "he" came out at the age of two. Man, "he" must be a genius because at that age I was just starting my potty training so I could come out of diapers.)



Gee, you don't suppose "he" could have been influenced by his woke parents, do you?
 
I know these kids are being brainwashed. How can a child children possibly know at the age of two what gender they are on the inside when they probably don't even understand it (or at least fully) on the outside yet and what the difference is?
Theyism

How can we take your objection seriously when you keep using "they" with a singular antecedent? That collectivist and literally brain-damaging idiocy was the original assault on our language by the Leftist tongue-twisters. It is necessary to go back to the beginning of their Movement and rub out every initial influencing that was on their agenda in 1964.
 
Lol that's not very nice. Funny, but not nice. Let me just point out that the child is an innocent victim here though. As I said before,.. brainwashed.
They Are the Children Our Parents Warned Us Against

Innocent my ass! That coddled nasty weirdo shouldn't be let near any normal children.
 
Last edited:
Obviously.
It's amazing to me how minors under 18 don't have many legal rights, younger than 16, basically none and yet these woke parents think that their children can decide for themselves what "gender" they are, even down to 2 years old. How totally pathetic.
 
Where?

What law?
All over the place. it is common practice in the schools here in WA and there is a law here as well to include minors as 'protected people' that need not obtain parental consent or even parental notification for gender dysphoria or 'gender affirming care' whatever that may mean outside of the aforementioned gender dysphoria.

(38)(a) "Protected individual" means:
p. 8 SSB 5889.PL
1 (i) An adult covered as a dependent on the enrollee's health
2 benefit plan, including an individual enrolled on the health benefit
3 plan of the individual's registered domestic partner; or
4 (ii) A minor who may obtain health care without the consent of a
5 parent or legal guardian, pursuant to state or federal law.
6 (b) "Protected individual" does not include an individual deemed
7 not competent to provide informed consent for care under RCW
8 11.88.010(1)(e).
9 (39) "Sensitive health care services" means health services
10 related to reproductive health, sexually transmitted diseases,
11 substance use disorder, gender dysphoria, gender affirming care,
12 domestic violence, and mental health.
...

(4) A health carrier or insurer must direct all communication
29 regarding a protected individual's receipt of sensitive health care
30 services directly to the protected individual receiving care, or to a
31 physical or email address or telephone number specified by the
32 protected individual. A carrier or insurer may not disclose nonpublic
33 personal health information concerning sensitive health care services
34 provided to a protected individual to any person, including the
35 policyholder, the primary subscriber, or any plan enrollees other
36 than the protected individual receiving care, without the express
37 written consent or verbal authorization on a recorded telephone line
38 of the protected individual receiving care.
 
All over the place. it is common practice in the schools here in WA and there is a law here as well to include minors as 'protected people' that need not obtain parental consent or even parental notification for gender dysphoria or 'gender affirming care' whatever that may mean outside of the aforementioned gender dysphoria.

(38)(a) "Protected individual" means:
p. 8 SSB 5889.PL
1 (i) An adult covered as a dependent on the enrollee's health
2 benefit plan, including an individual enrolled on the health benefit
3 plan of the individual's registered domestic partner; or
4 (ii) A minor who may obtain health care without the consent of a
5 parent or legal guardian, pursuant to state or federal law.
6 (b) "Protected individual" does not include an individual deemed
7 not competent to provide informed consent for care under RCW
8 11.88.010(1)(e).
9 (39) "Sensitive health care services" means health services
10 related to reproductive health, sexually transmitted diseases,
11 substance use disorder, gender dysphoria, gender affirming care,
12 domestic violence, and mental health.
...

(4) A health carrier or insurer must direct all communication
29 regarding a protected individual's receipt of sensitive health care
30 services directly to the protected individual receiving care, or to a
31 physical or email address or telephone number specified by the
32 protected individual. A carrier or insurer may not disclose nonpublic
33 personal health information concerning sensitive health care services
34 provided to a protected individual to any person, including the
35 policyholder, the primary subscriber, or any plan enrollees other
36 than the protected individual receiving care, without the express
37 written consent or verbal authorization on a recorded telephone line
38 of the protected individual receiving care.
If those parents live with their children and love them. They would not have these issues.
 
If those parents live with their children and love them. They would not have these issues.
Your opinion of what they should do is irrelevant. I have not even made a value judgment statement in this thread yet. The point was that asking why they care is bullshit as the left is passing policies and laws to force parents out of the process. Once again, this is a clear example of 'how dare you notice what I am doing.'

The point stands.
 
Your opinion of what they should do is irrelevant. I have not even made a value judgment statement in this thread yet. The point was that asking why they care is bullshit as the left is passing policies and laws to force parents out of the process. Once again, this is a clear example of 'how dare you notice what I am doing.'

The point stands.

No, it doesn't. Is your point that the children's parent(s) have no idea what their kids are doing that the school knows more?
 
No, it doesn't. Is your point that the children's parent(s) have no idea what their kids are doing that the school knows more?
Nope, because that is not what I said.

I know, it is tough to deal with the fact you tried to pretend this was not happening and that laws were not getting passed but you cannot refute a direct post of the law and the school policies.

So now you deflect. It is a case of complaining that the right reacts to the laws and policies the left are pushing. A point you have not dealt with because you cant.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom