Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

[Toddsterpatriot]

Have you ever seen a supply/demand curve?

strike one.

explain Seattle and San Francisco.

So you've never taken an Econ class.
Tell me again how a higher MW raises employment for low-skilled labor.

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike two.
explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong.

The supply/demand curve is wrong? Dude!

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike three.
.
You can't explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?

Explain your dogma.

 

[danielpalos]

For the same reason we cannot simply lower the tax rate to zero, to grow our economy. Same basic concept.

and, social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour, anyway.

the left doesn't believe in subsidizing, already rich capitalist "leaches".

IOW, the MW costs jobs if it's too high. You cannot, therefore, simply raise it as high as you want with no impact.

special pleading? a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is better than the fourteen dollar an hour equivalent from social services.

There is no unemployment under Capitalism, only underpayment.

You apparently believe we can double the national MW with no impact. That is foolish.

lol. the "impact" is a cost of living adjustment for Labor.

You're arguing from ignorance again. Here's a hint. The majority by far of Americans earn less than $20/hr. Double the MW to $15/hr and all those workers will demand raises, big ones. You would see a lot more on welfare, and you would immediately start complaining that $14/hr welfare is too little since MW jobs pay more.

Tell you what. Let's lower the cost of welfare until it's less than MW.

You are the ignorant one, my friend. A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage puts upward pressure on wages.

 

[danielpalos]

strike one.

explain Seattle and San Francisco.

So you've never taken an Econ class.
Tell me again how a higher MW raises employment for low-skilled labor.

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike two.
explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong.

The supply/demand curve is wrong? Dude!

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike three.
.
You can't explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?

Explain your dogma.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So you've never taken an Econ class.
Tell me again how a higher MW raises employment for low-skilled labor.

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike two.
explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong.

The supply/demand curve is wrong? Dude!

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike three.
.
You can't explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?

Explain your dogma.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which only one buyer interacts with many would-be sellers of a particular product.

One (or a few) buyer(s) explains why a higher MW doesn't decrease demand for labor?

Dude!!

You get funnier by the post.

 

[danielpalos]

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike two.
explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong.

The supply/demand curve is wrong? Dude!

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike three.
.
You can't explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?

Explain your dogma.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which only one buyer interacts with many would-be sellers of a particular product.

One (or a few) buyer(s) explains why a higher MW doesn't decrease demand for labor?

Dude!!

You get funnier by the post.

A statutory minimum wage makes, illegals out of "cheap employers".

Merely fixing a Bad moral Standard, for less fortunate illegals, is all they do.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong.

The supply/demand curve is wrong? Dude!

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike three.
.
You can't explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?

Explain your dogma.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which only one buyer interacts with many would-be sellers of a particular product.

One (or a few) buyer(s) explains why a higher MW doesn't decrease demand for labor?

Dude!!

You get funnier by the post.

A statutory minimum wage makes, illegals out of "cheap employers".

Merely fixing a Bad moral Standard, for less fortunate illegals, is all they do.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

Dude!

Examples of a Monopsony
Monopsonies take many different forms, but they most commonly occur when a single employer controls an entire labor market. When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages, which drives down employee costs for the business.



Read more: Monopsony Monopsony

 

[danielpalos]

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike three.
.
You can't explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?

Explain your dogma.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which only one buyer interacts with many would-be sellers of a particular product.

One (or a few) buyer(s) explains why a higher MW doesn't decrease demand for labor?

Dude!!

You get funnier by the post.

A statutory minimum wage makes, illegals out of "cheap employers".

Merely fixing a Bad moral Standard, for less fortunate illegals, is all they do.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

Dude!

Examples of a Monopsony
Monopsonies take many different forms, but they most commonly occur when a single employer controls an entire labor market. When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages, which drives down employee costs for the business.



Read more: Monopsony Monopsony

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?

Explain your dogma.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which only one buyer interacts with many would-be sellers of a particular product.

One (or a few) buyer(s) explains why a higher MW doesn't decrease demand for labor?

Dude!!

You get funnier by the post.

A statutory minimum wage makes, illegals out of "cheap employers".

Merely fixing a Bad moral Standard, for less fortunate illegals, is all they do.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

Dude!

Examples of a Monopsony
Monopsonies take many different forms, but they most commonly occur when a single employer controls an entire labor market. When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages, which drives down employee costs for the business.



Read more: Monopsony Monopsony

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

Are you giggling every time you type "monopsony"?

Dude, a monopsony would drive wages down, not increase them. See?

When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages,

So back to the questions you ran from....

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?​

 

[OnePercenter]

Doesn't work anymore. Regulations and regulations alone allow American workers to make a living wage, IE; Chick-fil-A.

Econ 101 No Longer Explains the Job Market

Allows millions of illegal aliens to flood the job market.
Expresses shock when low-skilled Americans don't see rising wages.
Blames "employer power".

Ummmm…..if you boot the illegals, you give more power to the employees.

Employers aren't going to give raises unless they're made too.

You're lying.

That's what tRumps US Department of Labor says.

From May 2017 to May 2018, real average hourly earnings decreased 0.1 percent

Real Earnings Summary

Chicks $17.00/hr was due to regulation.

US Department of Labor says.

They said that "Employers aren't going to give raises unless they're made too"?
You're lying.
Thanks for the link.

View attachment 200884

Average hourly earnings increased from $26.21 in May 2017 to $26.92 in May 2018.
What government regulation forced them to do that?

Chicks $17.00/hr was due to regulation.

Which one? Link?

According to YOUR LINK, the REAL hourly pay hasn't gone up in at least one year, AND if you factor in inflation, the number at the end of the year is actually less. Why are you so against the middle class making a living wage? A tRump/Putin manifesto?

If you read the orginal link you will find out why the operator increased pay.

 

[danielpalos]

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which only one buyer interacts with many would-be sellers of a particular product.

One (or a few) buyer(s) explains why a higher MW doesn't decrease demand for labor?

Dude!!

You get funnier by the post.

A statutory minimum wage makes, illegals out of "cheap employers".

Merely fixing a Bad moral Standard, for less fortunate illegals, is all they do.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

Dude!

Examples of a Monopsony
Monopsonies take many different forms, but they most commonly occur when a single employer controls an entire labor market. When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages, which drives down employee costs for the business.



Read more: Monopsony Monopsony

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

Are you giggling every time you type "monopsony"?

Dude, a monopsony would drive wages down, not increase them. See?

When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages,

So back to the questions you ran from....

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?​

Thanks Received:
773
Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike three.
.
You can't explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.
Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?

Explain your dogma.
Click to expand...
Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.
Click to expand...
Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which only one buyer interacts with many would-be sellers of a particular product.

One (or a few) buyer(s) explains why a higher MW doesn't decrease demand for labor?

Dude!!

You get funnier by the post.
Click to expand...
A statutory minimum wage makes, illegals out of "cheap employers".

Merely fixing a Bad moral Standard, for less fortunate illegals, is all they do.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.
Click to expand...
Dude!

Examples of a Monopsony
Monopsonies take many different forms, but they most commonly occur when a single employer controls an entire labor market. When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages, which drives down employee costs for the business.



Read more: Monopsony Monopsony
Click to expand...
The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which only one buyer interacts with many would-be sellers of a particular product.

One (or a few) buyer(s) explains why a higher MW doesn't decrease demand for labor?

Dude!!

You get funnier by the post.

A statutory minimum wage makes, illegals out of "cheap employers".

Merely fixing a Bad moral Standard, for less fortunate illegals, is all they do.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

Dude!

Examples of a Monopsony
Monopsonies take many different forms, but they most commonly occur when a single employer controls an entire labor market. When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages, which drives down employee costs for the business.



Read more: Monopsony Monopsony

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

Are you giggling every time you type "monopsony"?

Dude, a monopsony would drive wages down, not increase them. See?

When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages,

So back to the questions you ran from....

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?​

lol. You did not rebut these in any way. Nothing but diversion is all you have.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium. The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.

 

[hadit]

IOW, the MW costs jobs if it's too high. You cannot, therefore, simply raise it as high as you want with no impact.

special pleading? a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is better than the fourteen dollar an hour equivalent from social services.

There is no unemployment under Capitalism, only underpayment.

You apparently believe we can double the national MW with no impact. That is foolish.

lol. the "impact" is a cost of living adjustment for Labor.

You're arguing from ignorance again. Here's a hint. The majority by far of Americans earn less than $20/hr. Double the MW to $15/hr and all those workers will demand raises, big ones. You would see a lot more on welfare, and you would immediately start complaining that $14/hr welfare is too little since MW jobs pay more.

Tell you what. Let's lower the cost of welfare until it's less than MW.

You are the ignorant one, my friend. A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage puts upward pressure on wages.

And downward pressure on jobs. You're still ignoring the flaws in your argument.

 

[danielpalos]

special pleading? a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is better than the fourteen dollar an hour equivalent from social services.

There is no unemployment under Capitalism, only underpayment.

You apparently believe we can double the national MW with no impact. That is foolish.

lol. the "impact" is a cost of living adjustment for Labor.

You're arguing from ignorance again. Here's a hint. The majority by far of Americans earn less than $20/hr. Double the MW to $15/hr and all those workers will demand raises, big ones. You would see a lot more on welfare, and you would immediately start complaining that $14/hr welfare is too little since MW jobs pay more.

Tell you what. Let's lower the cost of welfare until it's less than MW.

You are the ignorant one, my friend. A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage puts upward pressure on wages.

And downward pressure on jobs. You're still ignoring the flaws in your argument.

You are the only one with flaws in your argument. You can't explain Seattle or San Francisco, the left can.

 

[danielpalos]

Doesn't work anymore. Regulations and regulations alone allow American workers to make a living wage, IE; Chick-fil-A.

Econ 101 No Longer Explains the Job Market

Allows millions of illegal aliens to flood the job market.
Expresses shock when low-skilled Americans don't see rising wages.
Blames "employer power".

Ummmm…..if you boot the illegals, you give more power to the employees.

Employers aren't going to give raises unless they're made too.

You're lying.

That's what tRumps US Department of Labor says.

From May 2017 to May 2018, real average hourly earnings decreased 0.1 percent

Real Earnings Summary

Chicks $17.00/hr was due to regulation.

US Department of Labor says.

They said that "Employers aren't going to give raises unless they're made too"?
You're lying.
Thanks for the link.

View attachment 200884

Average hourly earnings increased from $26.21 in May 2017 to $26.92 in May 2018.
What government regulation forced them to do that?

Chicks $17.00/hr was due to regulation.

Which one? Link?

why are so many other capitalists, so cheap?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Allows millions of illegal aliens to flood the job market.
Expresses shock when low-skilled Americans don't see rising wages.
Blames "employer power".

Ummmm…..if you boot the illegals, you give more power to the employees.

Employers aren't going to give raises unless they're made too.

You're lying.

That's what tRumps US Department of Labor says.

From May 2017 to May 2018, real average hourly earnings decreased 0.1 percent

Real Earnings Summary

Chicks $17.00/hr was due to regulation.

US Department of Labor says.

They said that "Employers aren't going to give raises unless they're made too"?
You're lying.
Thanks for the link.

View attachment 200884

Average hourly earnings increased from $26.21 in May 2017 to $26.92 in May 2018.
What government regulation forced them to do that?

Chicks $17.00/hr was due to regulation.

Which one? Link?

According to YOUR LINK, the REAL hourly pay hasn't gone up in at least one year, AND if you factor in inflation, the number at the end of the year is actually less. Why are you so against the middle class making a living wage? A tRump/Putin manifesto?

If you read the orginal link you will find out why the operator increased pay.

According to YOUR LINK, the REAL hourly pay hasn't gone up in at least one year,

Why would you bring up REAL pay?
You think corporations don't give raises unless they're forced.
When did government force them in the last year? Link?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which only one buyer interacts with many would-be sellers of a particular product.

One (or a few) buyer(s) explains why a higher MW doesn't decrease demand for labor?

Dude!!

You get funnier by the post.

A statutory minimum wage makes, illegals out of "cheap employers".

Merely fixing a Bad moral Standard, for less fortunate illegals, is all they do.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

Dude!

Examples of a Monopsony
Monopsonies take many different forms, but they most commonly occur when a single employer controls an entire labor market. When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages, which drives down employee costs for the business.



Read more: Monopsony Monopsony

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

Are you giggling every time you type "monopsony"?

Dude, a monopsony would drive wages down, not increase them. See?

When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages,

So back to the questions you ran from....

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?​

Thanks Received:
773
Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike three.
.
You can't explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.
Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?

Explain your dogma.
Click to expand...
Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.
Click to expand...
Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which only one buyer interacts with many would-be sellers of a particular product.

One (or a few) buyer(s) explains why a higher MW doesn't decrease demand for labor?

Dude!!

You get funnier by the post.
Click to expand...
A statutory minimum wage makes, illegals out of "cheap employers".

Merely fixing a Bad moral Standard, for less fortunate illegals, is all they do.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.
Click to expand...
Dude!

Examples of a Monopsony
Monopsonies take many different forms, but they most commonly occur when a single employer controls an entire labor market. When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages, which drives down employee costs for the business.



Read more: Monopsony Monopsony
Click to expand...
The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which only one buyer interacts with many would-be sellers of a particular product.

One (or a few) buyer(s) explains why a higher MW doesn't decrease demand for labor?

Dude!!

You get funnier by the post.

A statutory minimum wage makes, illegals out of "cheap employers".

Merely fixing a Bad moral Standard, for less fortunate illegals, is all they do.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

Dude!

Examples of a Monopsony
Monopsonies take many different forms, but they most commonly occur when a single employer controls an entire labor market. When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages, which drives down employee costs for the business.



Read more: Monopsony Monopsony

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

Are you giggling every time you type "monopsony"?

Dude, a monopsony would drive wages down, not increase them. See?

When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages,

So back to the questions you ran from....

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?​

lol. You did not rebut these in any way. Nothing but diversion is all you have.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium. The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."​

Outlawing cheaper labor didn't buy up the labor, it kept the labor unemployed.​

You did not rebut these in any way.

You claimed a monopsony, which lowers wages, is credited with higher wages.
You don't know what a supply/demand curve is.

Were you this stupid before all the weed?

 

[hadit]

You apparently believe we can double the national MW with no impact. That is foolish.

lol. the "impact" is a cost of living adjustment for Labor.

You're arguing from ignorance again. Here's a hint. The majority by far of Americans earn less than $20/hr. Double the MW to $15/hr and all those workers will demand raises, big ones. You would see a lot more on welfare, and you would immediately start complaining that $14/hr welfare is too little since MW jobs pay more.

Tell you what. Let's lower the cost of welfare until it's less than MW.

You are the ignorant one, my friend. A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage puts upward pressure on wages.

And downward pressure on jobs. You're still ignoring the flaws in your argument.

You are the only one with flaws in your argument. You can't explain Seattle or San Francisco, the left can.

I already did. You didn't like the explanation so you ignored it.

 

[danielpalos]

A statutory minimum wage makes, illegals out of "cheap employers".

Merely fixing a Bad moral Standard, for less fortunate illegals, is all they do.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

Dude!

Examples of a Monopsony
Monopsonies take many different forms, but they most commonly occur when a single employer controls an entire labor market. When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages, which drives down employee costs for the business.



Read more: Monopsony Monopsony

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

Are you giggling every time you type "monopsony"?

Dude, a monopsony would drive wages down, not increase them. See?

When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages,

So back to the questions you ran from....

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?​

Thanks Received:
773
Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike three.
.
You can't explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.
Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?

Explain your dogma.
Click to expand...
Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.
Click to expand...
Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which only one buyer interacts with many would-be sellers of a particular product.

One (or a few) buyer(s) explains why a higher MW doesn't decrease demand for labor?

Dude!!

You get funnier by the post.
Click to expand...
A statutory minimum wage makes, illegals out of "cheap employers".

Merely fixing a Bad moral Standard, for less fortunate illegals, is all they do.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.
Click to expand...
Dude!

Examples of a Monopsony
Monopsonies take many different forms, but they most commonly occur when a single employer controls an entire labor market. When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages, which drives down employee costs for the business.



Read more: Monopsony Monopsony
Click to expand...
The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

A statutory minimum wage makes, illegals out of "cheap employers".

Merely fixing a Bad moral Standard, for less fortunate illegals, is all they do.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

Dude!

Examples of a Monopsony
Monopsonies take many different forms, but they most commonly occur when a single employer controls an entire labor market. When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages, which drives down employee costs for the business.



Read more: Monopsony Monopsony

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

Are you giggling every time you type "monopsony"?

Dude, a monopsony would drive wages down, not increase them. See?

When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages,

So back to the questions you ran from....

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?​

lol. You did not rebut these in any way. Nothing but diversion is all you have.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium. The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

Outlawing cheaper labor didn't buy up the labor, it kept the labor unemployed.​

You still can't explain Seattle and San Francisco, right wingers. Fallacy is all you seem to have.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Dude!

Examples of a Monopsony
Monopsonies take many different forms, but they most commonly occur when a single employer controls an entire labor market. When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages, which drives down employee costs for the business.



Read more: Monopsony Monopsony

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

Are you giggling every time you type "monopsony"?

Dude, a monopsony would drive wages down, not increase them. See?

When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages,

So back to the questions you ran from....

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?​

Thanks Received:
773
Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike three.
.
You can't explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.
Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?

Explain your dogma.
Click to expand...
Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.
Click to expand...
Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which only one buyer interacts with many would-be sellers of a particular product.

One (or a few) buyer(s) explains why a higher MW doesn't decrease demand for labor?

Dude!!

You get funnier by the post.
Click to expand...
A statutory minimum wage makes, illegals out of "cheap employers".

Merely fixing a Bad moral Standard, for less fortunate illegals, is all they do.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.
Click to expand...
Dude!

Examples of a Monopsony
Monopsonies take many different forms, but they most commonly occur when a single employer controls an entire labor market. When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages, which drives down employee costs for the business.



Read more: Monopsony Monopsony
Click to expand...
The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

Dude!

Examples of a Monopsony
Monopsonies take many different forms, but they most commonly occur when a single employer controls an entire labor market. When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages, which drives down employee costs for the business.



Read more: Monopsony Monopsony

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

Are you giggling every time you type "monopsony"?

Dude, a monopsony would drive wages down, not increase them. See?

When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages,

So back to the questions you ran from....

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?​

lol. You did not rebut these in any way. Nothing but diversion is all you have.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium. The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

Outlawing cheaper labor didn't buy up the labor, it kept the labor unemployed.​

You still can't explain Seattle and San Francisco, right wingers. Fallacy is all you seem to have.

As soon as you answer the questions you ran from....

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?

….I'll be happy to explain Seattle and San Francisco

 

[danielpalos]

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

Are you giggling every time you type "monopsony"?

Dude, a monopsony would drive wages down, not increase them. See?

When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages,

So back to the questions you ran from....

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?​

Thanks Received:
773
Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike three.
.
You can't explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.
Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?

Explain your dogma.
Click to expand...
Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.
Click to expand...
Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which only one buyer interacts with many would-be sellers of a particular product.

One (or a few) buyer(s) explains why a higher MW doesn't decrease demand for labor?

Dude!!

You get funnier by the post.
Click to expand...
A statutory minimum wage makes, illegals out of "cheap employers".

Merely fixing a Bad moral Standard, for less fortunate illegals, is all they do.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.
Click to expand...
Dude!

Examples of a Monopsony
Monopsonies take many different forms, but they most commonly occur when a single employer controls an entire labor market. When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages, which drives down employee costs for the business.



Read more: Monopsony Monopsony
Click to expand...
The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

Are you giggling every time you type "monopsony"?

Dude, a monopsony would drive wages down, not increase them. See?

When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages,

So back to the questions you ran from....

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?​

lol. You did not rebut these in any way. Nothing but diversion is all you have.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium. The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

Outlawing cheaper labor didn't buy up the labor, it kept the labor unemployed.​

You still can't explain Seattle and San Francisco, right wingers. Fallacy is all you seem to have.

As soon as you answer the questions you ran from....

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?

….I'll be happy to explain Seattle and San Francisco

Reading comprehension helps.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Are you giggling every time you type "monopsony"?

Dude, a monopsony would drive wages down, not increase them. See?

When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages,

So back to the questions you ran from....

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?​

Thanks Received:
773
Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike three.
.
You can't explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.
Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?

Explain your dogma.
Click to expand...
Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.
Click to expand...
Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium.

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which only one buyer interacts with many would-be sellers of a particular product.

One (or a few) buyer(s) explains why a higher MW doesn't decrease demand for labor?

Dude!!

You get funnier by the post.
Click to expand...
A statutory minimum wage makes, illegals out of "cheap employers".

Merely fixing a Bad moral Standard, for less fortunate illegals, is all they do.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.
Click to expand...
Dude!

Examples of a Monopsony
Monopsonies take many different forms, but they most commonly occur when a single employer controls an entire labor market. When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages, which drives down employee costs for the business.



Read more: Monopsony Monopsony
Click to expand...
The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

The left has results, not excuses. Only the right wing does that, by custom and habit, until it is indistinguishable from any moral.

Are you giggling every time you type "monopsony"?

Dude, a monopsony would drive wages down, not increase them. See?

When this happens, the sellers, in this case the potential employees, compete for the few jobs available by accepting lower wages,

So back to the questions you ran from....

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?​

lol. You did not rebut these in any way. Nothing but diversion is all you have.

Monopsony explains why there is a lower unemployment rate at the new equilibrium. The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

Capitalism explains why more people are looking for work at that price point.

That Concept, applies. Government simply "co-opts" any wages lower than the statutory minimum wage and "acts like a single employer who bought up all labor cheaper than the minimum wage."

Outlawing cheaper labor didn't buy up the labor, it kept the labor unemployed.​

You still can't explain Seattle and San Francisco, right wingers. Fallacy is all you seem to have.

As soon as you answer the questions you ran from....

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?

….I'll be happy to explain Seattle and San Francisco

Reading comprehension helps.

The economic factor is that there are no, lawful buyers for less than the minimum wage; a de jure, monopsony.

Is there more demand for unskilled labor at $7.25/hour or at $15/hour?
What about at $20/hour? $30/hour?