Charlie Kirk will now be even more influential

I just accept them.
I accept them too.

If you were born male, you're male.

If you were born female, you're female.

I accept that as the established science. My feelings or your feelings are never going to change that.

If you believe you are a XY female with a penis, you are 100% allowed to believe that.

But you cannot force me to believe that.
 
I support gay people. Have always done so. But trannies are mentally deranged.

I have ALWAYS stated that.
As Have I, I've stated EVERY TIME that I don't understand the trans, but I accept them and certainly don't HATE them or Humiliate them...... Like KIRK did.

but it is none of my business, I don't condone it, and as a teacher, I have NEVER taught it, as you*** have claimed.....(*** you) as in the cult blaming me as a teacher of this nefarious indoctrination, of which I have NEVER done.
 
XY = Male
XX = Female

I've never denied that......if you believe otherwise, just post the evidence.

You are not required to participate, I don't participate either.
I just accept them.
Crossdressing, gayness, etc has been around since humans existed.
I don't understand, but once again, it is NOT up to me to judge or humiliate those that participate.
When a tranny demands I refer to them as "they/them, I politely say no. If you present as female I will call you she. If you present as male I will refer to you as him.

That's it.

If they can't accept that, then **** them.
 
The topic was Trans and Gay, and how KIRK despised and Humiliated Them.
NOT Illegals.

Did KIRK demean the Trans and the Gay? Yes or No?


No LIES from me.
KIRK despised the trans and the Gays.
KIRK defied the word of GOD and Jesus by demeaning these people.
They are people, right?
its demeaning for not accepting that a biological male can be or is a woman ? that's a very.. very low bar ..
 
When a tranny demands I refer to them as "they/them, I politely say no. If you present as female I will call you she. If you present as male I will refer to you as him.

That's it.

If they can't accept that, then **** them.
I teach school.
I have some, very few, students that identify as trans.
Why? I will never understand.

Do I treat them equally, of course.

I have NEVER had a 'trans' student DEMAND that I call them a certain way.
Have YOU?
Have you ever actually encountered a trans individual that "DEMANDED" from you.
I have, and they/them/she/it/etc..... just haven't.

Answer honestly.
 
Charlie Kirk will eventually be remembered for who and what he actually was. I feel very sorry for his children, because they are going to have to hear it.
Who do you think he was ? All I ever seen him do is give people a chance to give their side of an argument and debate, respectfully. It's intolerant people like yourself that always tired to shut him down.
 
I teach school.
I have some, very few, students that identify as trans.
Why? I will never understand.

Do I treat them equally, of course.

I have NEVER had a 'trans' student DEMAND that I call them a certain way.
Have YOU?
Have you ever actually encountered a trans individual that "DEMANDED" from you.
I have, and they/them/she/it/etc..... just haven't.

Answer honestly.
Yes. More than once. And they were hateful about it.
 
Who do you think he was ? All I ever seen him do is give people a chance to give their side of an argument and debate, respectfully. It's intolerant people like yourself that always tired to shut him down.
You can stop lying. Kirk was intolerant, racist, and sexist. His debates were his effort to tell everybody else how wrong they were. But now that he has been gunned down, people on the right want to sanitize him and expect everybody else to create a Charlie Kirk that didn't exist, and if we don't, then we're evil.
 
Yes. More than once. And they were hateful about it.
OK,

1) did they randomly approach you and attack you?

or

2) Was it some other type of interaction you had.


Seriously, I'm trying to have some discourse here.
Let's go.

Was it 1) or 2)
 
OK,

1) did they randomly approach you and attack you?

or

2) Was it some other type of interaction you had.


Seriously, I'm trying to have some discourse here.
Let's go.

Was it 1) or 2)
As you know, I live in Missouri.



"Sir" and "Ma'am" are drilled into folks of my generation from a very young age. It's automatic. "Yes Sir", "Yes Ma'am", "pardon me, Ma'am".

Well... it ain't as easy as it used to be to make an accurate identification. A "thank you, Sir" can cause a major problem.

And it's not as easy as you might think to stifle an ingrained habit of 40 years.

If you have stubble on your chin... I'm likely going to call you Sir.
 
As you know, I live in Missouri.



"Sir" and "Ma'am" are drilled into folks of my generation from a very young age. It's automatic. "Yes Sir", "Yes Ma'am", "pardon me, Ma'am".

Well... it ain't as easy as it used to be to make an accurate identification. A "thank you, Sir" can cause a major problem.

And it's not as easy as you might think to stifle an ingrained habit of 40 years.

If you have stubble on your chin...
SO........

1) did they randomly approach you and attack you?

or

2) Was it some other type of interaction you had.


Seriously, I'm trying to have some discourse here.
Let's go.

Was it 1) or 2)
 
SO........

1) did they randomly approach you and attack you?

or

2) Was it some other type of interaction you had.


Seriously, I'm trying to have some discourse here.
Let's go.

Was it 1) or 2)
I just answered that.
 
I just answered that.
Not really, you avoided it.

So......just directly answer with 1) or 2)

1) did they randomly approach you and attack you?

or

2) Was it some other type of interaction you had.
 
15th post
Not really, you avoided it.

So......just directly answer with 1) or 2)

1) did they randomly approach you and attack you?

or

2) Was it some other type of interaction you had.
Are you a crazy person?

I've answered this question.

Is critical thinking beyond your skill level, "educator"?

So is it 1) you're an imbecile who can't debate without stupidly injecting the strawman "and attacked you"?

Or 2) is there some other reason you're unable to extrapolate from my reply that it was a random interaction EXACTLY as I described?

1) or 2)???
 
Last edited:
Not really, you avoided it.

So......just directly answer with 1) or 2)

1) did they randomly approach you and attack you?

or

2) Was it some other type of interaction you had.
Here is my response.

It is not rocket science.

It is straightforward and unambiguous.

Reply to it like you have some common sense or go **** yourself... The choice is entirely up to you... but if this is the quality of the skills of an educator in America, it's no wonder students are failing to learn.

______________

'As you know, I live in Missouri.



"Sir" and "Ma'am" are drilled into folks of my generation from a very young age. It's automatic. "Yes Sir", "Yes Ma'am", "pardon me, Ma'am".

Well... it ain't as easy as it used to be to make an accurate identification. A "thank you, Sir" can cause a major problem.

And it's not as easy as you might think to stifle an ingrained habit of 40 years.

If you have stubble on your chin... I'm likely going to call you Sir.'
 
I've answered this question.
You didn't.
Why can't you directly answer the question?



So......just directly answer with 1) or 2)

1) did they randomly approach you and attack you?

or

2) Was it some other type of interaction you had.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom