Charlie Kirk to become the next MLK

[rightwinger]

Wow, more fake quotes and quotes taken out of context.


Like the “empathy” quote. He said he doesn’t like that word, because he prefers the word “sympathy”. Empathy implies you know what someone else is feeling, but the truth is you do not know how someone else actually feels. Sympathy is actually real.

Empathy means you feel things from their point of view…..Walk a mile in their shoes

Sympathy means you feel sorry for them

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Sources?

.

All they have is what their TV told them to say.

.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Noticably absent

And that is why I’d have no problem removing that mural.

 

[theHawk]

Empathy means you feel things from their point of view…..Walk a mile in their shoes

Sympathy means you feel sorry for them

Thanks for proving Charlie’s point. You can’t walk in someone else’s shoes.

It’s just virtue signaling to make it sound like you’ve experienced the same.

If I told you I empathize with a black man dealing with racism, would you believe it?

 

[Paddlefoot]

 

[dudmuck]

You showed me a meme with zero evidence to support the meme.

mistake passing civil rights --> Charlie Kirk once said passing the Civil Rights Act was a 'huge mistake'
called MLK awful --> Fact Check: Charlie Kirk called Martin Luther King Jr. 'awful'
if i see a black pilot --> Fact Check: Real Charlie Kirk quote about Black pilot qualifications circulates online
lgbtq is a social contagion -->
militia to protect white demographics -->

 

[Godboy]

mistake passing civil rights --> Charlie Kirk once said passing the Civil Rights Act was a 'huge mistake'
called MLK awful --> Fact Check: Charlie Kirk called Martin Luther King Jr. 'awful'
if i see a black pilot --> Fact Check: Real Charlie Kirk quote about Black pilot qualifications circulates online
lgbtq is a social contagion -->
militia to protect white demographics -->

Thank you for proving my point. First off, he didnt say "black women do not have brain processing power". In a discussion about Affirmative Action, he mentioned 4 black women who openly confess that they were hired because of Affirmative Action. All 4 of them ARE in fact stupid. That doesnt mean that ALL black women are stupid. He never said any such thing. You are a liar.

As for the other videos, there isnt one thing that he said that wasnt true. We can go through each individual video and debate their merits if you want, but youre going to lose that debate.

 

[rightwinger]

Thank you for proving my point. First off, he didnt say "black women do not have brain processing power". In a discussion about Affirmative Action, he mentioned 4 black women who openly confess that they were hired because of Affirmative Action. All 4 of them ARE in fact stupid. That doesnt mean that ALL black women are stupid. He never said any such thing. You are a liar.

As for the other videos, there isnt one thing that he said that wasnt true. We can go through each individual video and debate their merits if you want, but youre going to lose that debate.

Racist supports another racist

Those women are extremely bright and not only graduated from prestigious universities but excelled academically.

Something Kirk never managed to do

 

[ThisIsMe]

yea lets compare quotes

Yes, let's compare quotes, but when you do, post the full conversations, not just edited sentence fragments.

 

[rightwinger]

Yes, let's compare quotes, but when you do, post the full conversations, not just edited sentence fragments.

Why don’t you just post what you disagree with?

 

[LibertyKid]

Racist supports another racist

Conjecture and typical response from anyone that can't have a reasonable conversation.

Those women are extremely bright and not only graduated from prestigious universities but excelled academically.

BUT... what you refuse to acknowledge is how AA helped them to gain entrance because of their race and not because of merit. Which has been Kirk's point when it comes to DEI and AA. So what is more racist. Awarding based on merit, or awarding based on color of skin?

Something Kirk never managed to do

Again, completely tone deaf to Kirk's body of work.

 

[Godboy]

Racist supports another racist

Those women are extremely bright and not only graduated from prestigious universities but excelled academically.

Something Kirk never managed to do

They are retards and they have gone out of their way to be offensive and outright lie on countless occasions. Being black wont shield you from criticism, and calling us racists for it doesnt work anymore. You have officially lost that culture war.

 

[dudmuck]

Thank you for proving my point. First off, he didnt say "black women do not have brain processing power". In a discussion about Affirmative Action, he mentioned 4 black women who openly confess that they were hired because of Affirmative Action. All 4 of them ARE in fact stupid. That doesnt mean that ALL black women are stupid. He never said any such thing. You are a liar.

As for the other videos, there isnt one thing that he said that wasnt true. We can go through each individual video and debate their merits if you want, but youre going to lose that debate.

 

[Godboy]

What did he say that was racist? Quote is, but this time make a real quote. Dont give me false quotes anymore.

 

[rightwinger]

Conjecture and typical response from anyone that can't have a reasonable conversation.

BUT... what you refuse to acknowledge is how AA helped them to gain entrance because of their race and not because of merit. Which has been Kirk's point when it comes to DEI and AA. So what is more racist. Awarding based on merit, or awarding based on color of skin?

Again, completely tone deaf to Kirk's body of work.

AA may have given them an opportunity but it was the women themselves who excelled once given that opportunity.
Charlie Kirk was given the opportunity to attend college but he dropped out

 

[LibertyKid]

AA may have given them an opportunity but it was the women themselves who excelled once given that opportunity.

Excel is completely subjective.

Charlie Kirk was given the opportunity to attend college but he dropped out

And look at how successful he was. His whole point about college is that there are many liberal arts paths in college that come with mountains of debt with little ROI in the marketplace. It's plain and simple. Paths like sciences, engineering, mathematics, medicine, yes, require higher levels of education, but the ROI is there to justify potential costs of the education and those are the paths Charlie encouraged.

Charlie was a proponent of the trades, bringing back factory work to Americans. He understood that not everyone is college bound or college fit.

But, you probably didn't realize that, and are hanging on the idea that he 'dropped out of college' as some sort of moral merit badge for your argument. Rather, it just shows how ignorant you are. And his body of work absolutely validates how smart one can be outside of a college education as most of the students he debated, didn't have critical thinking skills or the ability to formulate an unbiased point.

 

[rightwinger]

Excel is completely subjective.

Wrong again
Once admitted to prestigious universities they still had to do the work, still had to pass the exams, still had to compete with white students
They graduated at the top of their class

 

[rightwinger]

But, you probably didn't realize that, and are hanging on the idea that he 'dropped out of college' as some sort of moral merit badge for your argument

What it shows is that as a young adult, Charlie did not have the personal commitment to complete the work.

That he ultimately succeeded is no more impressive than a Kardashian

 

[Death-Ninja]

(an opinion piece)


MLK was an awful man...a lousy husband and a derelict father not mention a shameless plagiarist; But he was a figurehead for the people at a time when they needed hope. More than anything else about MLK it was his timing... he was at the right place at the right time backing the right issue.

For that reason people tend to look away from the particulars and focus on the larger issue which at the time was equal civil rights for all human beings. Always and forever a righteous cause!

We face a similar situation today with the onslaught of deviance attacking normalcy and tradition. Less than 1% of the population has managed to grab the public podium and are working very hard to make changes in society that 99% of society does not want. It will not succeed but it has grown into an oppressive movement using tactics like cancel culture, political arm bending and now we have moved to violence.

Charlie Kirk also had unusually good timing. He rose up in the midst of this onslaught to become a figurehead for the traditionalists, the normals.

He had a message that resonated with them and while he certainly wasn't perfect ( geez you think MLK thought about perfect when he was screwing around with the prostitutes from City to City? ) this message had a legitimate foundation.

Now with his martyrdom we will see that message amplified a thousand times. Whatever it is the confessed shooter sought to accomplish will be overturned many fold in the other direction.

Just the other day..... 24 hours after Kirk's death I drove by the YWCA mural wall in my city which up till then was inhabited by the most exquisite work of art demonstrating the growth of a young black girl into womanhood, motherhood and then old age against the backdrop of an urban setting. I grew to love that picture..... To my great dismay it was being whitewashed to be replaced by an image of Charlie Kirk.

Prophetic much?

Yes I think so.

This pretty much explains why you murdered him, make no mistake fascist democrat demoniac's, Robinson pulled the trigger, but virtually every fascist democrat extant put him in position to do so! This is why you did so, you are demonically driven people, yes, demonically driven, and you hate God, and the hour is so very late for you,

Tucker Carlson Reveals the “Sin” That Cost Charlie Kirk His Life | The Gateway Pundit | by Vigilant Fox

This article originally appeared on vigilantfox.com and was republished with permission.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

"That “sin,” Carlson said, was Kirk’s profound love for God and Jesus Christ. He never hid his faith, and it guided everything he did. But as Carlson explained, even though Christianity is a peaceful religion, it paradoxically enrages many."

 

[rightwinger]

Let’s look at the hypocrisy of Charlie Kirk mocking Ketanji Brown Jackson
“Can’t be taken seriously because you steal a white persons slot”

Jackson graduated at the top of her HS class was admitted to Harvard University graduating at the top of her class then graduating Harvard Law at the top of her class
Then mocks her for being selected to the Supreme Court because she was a black woman….DEI Hire

Now compare Jackson to black Conservative icon Clarence Thomas. Thomas admits he was admitted at Holy Cross because of AA. He was accepted at Harvard Law the same way.
Clarence Thomas was appointed to the Supreme Court as the most qualified conservative black judge to replace the first black Justice Thurgood Marshall.
A DEI hire

Yet Thomas is to be taken seriously but not Jackson