Charlie Kirk Shot and Killed at Utah Valley University

Just breaking now. Charlie Kirk has reportedly been shot in the neck at Utah Vallely University. His status is unknown.

Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk was shot on Wednesday at an event in Utah, a source confirmed to Just the News.

Kirk was speaking at an event in Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. Deseret News reported. Eyewitnesses stated that he was shot in the neck. His status is unclear.


JFC

One of two school shootings today.

Well, maybe more Americans will care about school shootings, now.
 
Hilarious

You maga suckers use anger to create crisis all the time.

It’s getting boring this false outrage.
Thats your syphilis infection talking. you have brain damage as a result of your untreated infection.
 
The Democrats are the party of Death and Destruction. Aborting millions of babies every year. Letting violent criminals out of jail so they can stab women on a subway. Shooting a guy who was speaking truth to freedom, and the only way Democrats can silence that guy, is with a bullet. Maybe it is time to start give some payback.

Duke Ferdinand anyone?
Shooting a guy who was speaking truth to freedom

Who shot Charley?
 
The right is just making Kirk a propaganda puppet with his death to stir up outrage and anger from the base.

It’s intellectually lazy
If you think that anyone needed to "stir up" outrage and anger from conservatives you're clueless, Otto! The left's violence has gone beyond the pale. You use bullets and riots when you can't win elections.
 
I doubt that, very much.
Duck AI had this to say:

Public Reactions​


The reactions to Kirk's speeches are polarized. Supporters argue that he is exercising his right to free speech and engaging in necessary debates on contentious issues. Critics, however, assert that his rhetoric contributes to a culture of intolerance and can incite violence or discrimination against marginalized groups.


  • Support for Free Speech: Many of Kirk's supporters view his statements as part of a broader conversation about free speech on college campuses, where they believe conservative voices are often silenced.
  • Condemnation from Opponents: Conversely, opponents argue that his comments can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and foster an environment of hate.
Kirk was recently shot during an event, which has drawn widespread attention and condemnation of political violence. This incident has overshadowed previous controversies, leading to discussions about the safety of public figures and the implications of political rhetoric in today's climate.


In summary, while Charlie Kirk's statements have led to accusations of hate speech, the interpretation of his words varies widely among different audiences. The ongoing debate about his rhetoric reflects broader societal tensions regarding free speech, political discourse, and the impact of language on marginalized communities.
AI is our new Snopes.com.

Yea, no one cares what AI has to say about pretty much anything.
 
I don't have a fraction of Kirk's experience in engaging with a hostile audience, and I even disagreed with him on something like religion. . . . but give me that mic and the opportunity, and I will pick right up where he left off.

There is no way his family could have been prepared enough for something like this.

I hope there is someone in the wings, ready to step into Charlie's circle.

The sooner the better.
Yelling loud and obnoxiously into a microphone doesn’t win arguments.

It makes you a small person.
 
The right is just making Kirk a propaganda puppet with his death to stir up outrage and anger from the base.

It’s intellectually lazy
the guy had millions of subscribers to his organization called Turning Point USA podcast .. he was a major influencer that reached millions of young college aged voters that helped Trump get elected ..
 
15th post
cartoon boy!!!! how'z it hanging? not more than a coupe inches, i'm sure.

anyhoo ... i didn't mean threatened the way you think ... perhaps if you rub them thar 2 remaining brain cells of yers ... a spark might just give you a clue!


Laugh while you can.
 
So, as I sit here seeing statements come out from all kinds of organizations mourning his loss....I wonder:

If this was some guy who got angry and pulled out a gun he brought with him....then I suspect it was just him. I can see where it might end there like it often does with school shooters. Disaffected or even just emotional.

In this case, it appears planned and the person who did it is a good shot. Also, there was an escape plan and I fear we may never know who did it.

My question is why:

1. His was not the worst language ever used.
2. He causes were not super specfic.
3. He is not aspirking (that I know of) to political office.

So why would someone want this done Either the shooter alone or someone who conspired with a professional.

Why?
 
The Democrats are the party of Death and Destruction. Aborting millions of babies every year. Letting violent criminals out of jail so they can stab women on a subway. Shooting a guy who was speaking truth to freedom, and the only way Democrats can silence that guy, is with a bullet. Maybe it is time to start give some payback.

Duke Ferdinand anyone?
I know you are upset .. but violence isn't the answer ..
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom