Charlie Kirk Shot and Killed at Utah Valley University

Yep, nothing about this makes any sense.

Is it possible he rebelled against his upbringing, sure, lots of kids do.

But until and unless there is some social media evidence of such, none of this makes any sense at all.

a5wivh.jpg






a5wjdb.jpg


a5wjaj.jpg

Are we seeing the first seedlings of some conspiracy theory that Robinson was framed?

I told you it wouldn’t take long around here…..
 
That the same list you went through after the election?
Looks like you still need to go use it.
I am a grown up.

I skipped denial: I didnt accuse Trump of cheating at all. He won fair and square. I am man enough to admit that.

I skipped anger-depression and went straight to acceptance and shifted to how it would benefit me personally. It is what it is. I have voted for the loser in half the elections I have cast a vote in. I may have stopped for a second in anger at Biden for running again.
 
Are we seeing the first seedlings of some conspiracy theory that Robinson was framed?

I told you it wouldn’t take long around here…..
Make it make sense, I'm open minded.
 
Not playing your victim. I am merely pointing out that this guy was a Trump and Kirk hater. You guys acts as if there are no Democrats in red states. We have many in my red state, but they generally live on the other side of the tracks.
Sigh

Everyone knew the shooter did not like/agree with Kirk.

Personally, my first clue was when he shoot him in the neck on live television

But in the days in between the shooting and today, you people have been practically creaming in your jeans in the anticipation that the shooter would be some hair-dyed transsexual from California.

That’s kind of the whole point
 
who is that targeted at? hate is directed at something or someone. advise?
People that die from gun violence, simp.

Read the other quotes in the article, dumb ****....since you wanted to see them. --

He also said Black women "do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person's slot to go be taken somewhat seriously."​

 
Sigh

Everyone knew the shooter did not like/agree with Kirk.

Personally, my first clue was when he shoot him in the neck on live television

But in the days in between the shooting and today, you people have been practically creaming in your jeans in the anticipation that the shooter would be some hair-dyed transsexual from California.

That’s kind of the whole point
No the whole point is he is dead and you have shifted to a crisis over what the killer was speculated to be
Deflection defeated
 
Yep, nothing about this makes any sense.

Is it possible he rebelled against his upbringing, sure, lots of kids do.

But until and unless there is some social media evidence of such, none of this makes any sense at all.



a5wjaj.jpg

Couldnt be more of a maga product if I tried to draw one up.

I appreciate the right leaning posters rethinking their assumptions about this case.

Kids do dumb shit and some of their dumb shit is utterly devastating.
 
Make it make sense, I'm open minded.
No, I’m not the one disagreeing with the police, the president, the FBI, the kid’s father, the photographic evidence that all says this kid is the shooter

You’re the one implying they’re all wrong

You’re the one making the outrageous claims

Its on YOU to make YOUR claims make sense

That’s how it works
 
People that die from gun violence, simp.

Read the other quotes in the article, dumb ****....since you wanted to see them. --

He also said Black women "do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person's slot to go be taken somewhat seriously."​

He did not say black people but rather identified one person he was speaking about
 
Kids do dumb shit and some of their dumb shit is utterly devastating.
Did he really write trans propaganda on his bullets and weapons?

Couldnt be more of a maga product if I tried to draw one up.
Anyone that has studied political science would come to that conclusion as well. All of the metrics were there.

I still have no idea what the motive for this was.
 
Sigh

Everyone knew the shooter did not like/agree with Kirk.

Personally, my first clue was when he shoot him in the neck on live television

But in the days in between the shooting and today, you people have been practically creaming in your jeans in the anticipation that the shooter would be some hair-dyed transsexual from California.

That’s kind of the whole point
It was the legacy media that implied this.
 
15th post
What? What does being left wing have to do with getting dates with hot chicks in school?

I did okay in school in that department and politics never entered into it one way or the other. I don’t recall having strong political feelings at that age. I had other things on my mind, and most the “hot chicks” I knew cared even less about politics than I did


Peer pressure. If you get labeled a RW kook you are laughed at, shunned. Out. Even a Christian is a bad label i bet? As low as JHS if you admitted your parents voted Nixon? I'd bet you were out of the clique. No hot chicks want to be out of the norm. It's a long story. Not all but 95% or more. Maybe it's a bit different now? Or worse? I don't know. Those with HS kids these will know more.

In particular back to Vietnam war days. Try being a patriot at Webster College or NYU. That kind of peer pressure.
 
Last edited:
Jesus Christ

Like I said, how about when he shot him in the neck?
But your post implied that he was, a priori, a Kirk hater.



Is his shooting of Kirk the only data point on how you drew that conclusion?
 
People that die from gun violence, simp.
we've had centuries of people dying from guns. for you to think that guns unalive is your issue. too stupid to know that objects can't pull a trigger. What did this guy arrested have to do with gun violence?
 
Back
Top Bottom