The Democratic leadership supports "best practices" in gender affirmation. Such "best practices" are not coincidentally decided by the same people who profit from the lifetime hormones, the multiple surgeries starting at whatever age, and the constant psychological therapies.
Surgeries happen to children, we have testimony from those who have come to regret it.
It isn't about parental consent, because if a doctor recommends surgery or hormones and the parent does not consent, CPS can take the children away for "medical neglect."
Supporting puberty suppressing hormones for a child is absurd. Why make a permanent change because a pubescent child is (imagine this!) sexually confused?
If more than twenty percent of people support these kind of abusive treatments of children, they are only hearing one side of the argument. Therefore all the more reason to make sure those who oppose it have a chance to speak.
And without being shot in the neck.
So . . . he deserved to die is your point?