Charlie Kirk Shot and Killed at Utah Valley University

Yes. They are. They thrive on fear and division. They provoke it. They fan the flames. They feed on it.

Not in practice. The two shit parties have used their power to entrench themselves via the rules and the process. AND THEY FIGHT EVERY ******* EFFORT TO FIX THE PROBLEM.


Nobody wants your LW Marixst efforts to "fix" the system. You and your crew are a big reason the system is broken down//
 
He may have been starting to get a bit too loose with his words for some...

View attachment 1160723



Aside...

During a July 2025 episode of "The Charlie Kirk Show," Charlie Kirk and his guest, Tucker Carlson, engaged in a detailed discussion centered on the late financier Jeffrey Epstein and his alleged connections to Israeli intelligence. The conversation represented a notable instance of questioning the actions of a key U.S. ally on a prominent conservative platform.

The core of the discussion revolved around the theory that Epstein's sex trafficking and blackmail operations may have been conducted on behalf of a foreign intelligence agency, with Carlson specifically pointing to the possibility of Israeli involvement. Carlson articulated that it was "extremely obvious" that Epstein had "direct connections to a foreign government," and he argued that the reluctance in media and political circles to name Israel in this context was due to a climate of fear and censorship.

Both Kirk and Carlson were careful to frame their conversation as a matter of national interest and transparency, rather than an attack on Israel itself. They emphasized that asking critical questions about the potential influence of any foreign government on American soil should not be considered "hateful," "anti-Semitic," or "anti-Israel." Instead, they presented it as a fundamental right of citizens to hold their own government and foreign powers accountable.


Key points raised during their appearance included:

* Allegations of a Blackmail Scheme: Carlson put forward the idea that Epstein's activities were not merely the actions of an individual but were potentially part of a sophisticated blackmail operation designed to compromise influential American officials for the benefit of Israeli intelligence.

* Questioning Foreign Influence: Kirk echoed Carlson's concerns, stressing the need for open dialogue about the extent of foreign influence in American politics and affairs.

* The "Off-Limits" Nature of the Topic: A significant portion of the conversation was dedicated to the idea that it has become taboo to question the U.S.-Israel relationship or to suggest that Israeli intelligence could be involved in illicit activities on American soil. They argued that this unwillingness to engage in critical inquiry creates resentment and allows potentially harmful activities to go unexamined.

* High-Profile Connections: Carlson pointed to the known association between Epstein and former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak as a significant piece of circumstantial evidence that warranted further investigation.

In summary, the content of Charlie Kirk's and Tucker Carlson's discussion regarding Israel was not a broad critique of the nation's existence or general policies. Instead, it was a focused and pointed inquiry into the specific and serious allegations of Israeli intelligence potentially using Jeffrey Epstein as an asset to conduct a blackmail operation within the United States. They positioned their discussion as a necessary, albeit controversial, examination of national security and foreign influence.


4:45 PM · Sep 10, 2025
·
12K
Views





Relevant reading...


''There’s a growing firestorm of criticism aimed at Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA following Tucker Carlson’s controversial remarks at the organization’s recent Student Action Summit (SAS).
So, why the outrage?

It stems from a misunderstanding – especially among older, more traditional segments of the pro-Israel community – about what it takes to reach young people today. The MAGA coalition is broad, fragile, and filled with ideological crosscurrents. It is true, no doubt, that some genuine antisemites are trying to hijack the narrative. But few are fighting harder to stop them than Charlie Kirk."



So I dunno.

Queue Ben Shapiro to carry out the role for a more filtered, more controlled perspective aimed at the youth? Maybe that...


Interesting anomaly, if true...



And, for good measure?...





Yes, uncomfortable questions and fair conjecture may certainly sting where emotion and feelings prevail. But that's what serious people do. They ask uncomfortable questions...

Good post, thanks.

I'd guess it was an OP. By whom and why? I cannot say.
 
Nobody wants your LW Marixst efforts to "fix" the system. You and your crew are a big reason the system is broken down//
Their idea of “fixing the problem” is to give free shit to people who won’t get jobs, let violent criminals out of prison, and pay thugs $1000 a month not to steal stuff.
 
"conservative"

She had a disagreement with him, big ******* whoop.
And after her piece was published he started to receive hate texts calling him an "antisemite" and asking "Why is Megyn doing the bidding of Hamas?"
That's what you lefties never can understand, disagreements don't mean you then have to destroy the other person.
Yawn.
Which is what Kirk was trying to explain to you doddering morons.
Watch the video, he was actually trying to explain his astonishment at being called an "antisemite" as did Megyn Kelly.
 
Did you seriously just blame other posters for your own post being full of typos?

Really?


Yes. Board overloaded with LW Marxist maggots clogging the BandWith. I could not fix it or edit it fast enough to avoid dirty commee ridicule like from you. Board froze up as I hit post.
 
This was a horrible, awful, tragic, fucked up event. For many people.

AND, many who are so full of rage about it are the VERY SAME people who brush off and downplay school shooting after school shooting. Innocent children slaughtered in school.

So this attempt at moral superiority rings a little hollow.

VERY hollow.

I am genuinely curious, how exactly do people 'brush off and downplay' school shootings? Can you cite examples?
 
Yes. Board overloaded with LW Marxist maggots clogging the BandWith. I could not fix it or edit it fast enough to avoid dirty commee ridicule like from you. Board froze up as I hit post.
Me pointing out the absurdity of you blaming other people for your own typos constitutes “dirty commee (sic) ridicule”?
 
And after her piece was published he started to receive hate texts calling him an "antisemite" and asking "Why is Megyn doing the bidding of Hamas?"

Yawn.

Watch the video, he was actually trying to explain his astonishment at being called an "antisemite" as did Megyn Kelly.

Again, a disagreement.

If they were lefties they would all be crying and demanding they be removed from social media NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW
 
What does that have to do with Charlie Kirk’s assassination?
No idea if it does have anything to do with it, but when someone is assassinated looking at recent threats and hate messages sent to him seems entirely reasonable.
 
15th post
Rep. Byron Donalds:
“Laura, we can’t retreat from the crazy left. We simply can’t. If you do, you’re going to turn this country over to them. That’s not a provocative statement. That’s a statement of fact.

We have a responsibility in this moment to stand for the very principles that founded this nation, which is, yes, speaking your mind very clearly, petitioning your government, organizing, doing all those things, fighting for this Constitution, fighting for the future of America. That is the legacy of Charlie Kirk.

We can’t have a situation where now we’re fearful of even going out to eat with our loved ones or being outside. Obviously, the President, all the security measures they need to take, but we cannot retreat from this insanity. No, they win.

This country, and Charlie lived his life for this, this country is worth saving. It’s the best thing ever created on the face of the planet Earth. We’re 250 years in, and if we stand firm, we have another 250 years in front of.”
 
Again, a disagreement.

If they were lefties they would all be crying and demanding they be removed from social media NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW
Do you agree with his critics that he was an antisemite and Megyn Kelly now does the bidding of Hamas?
 
Back
Top Bottom