Missourian said:
As a good faith gesture, I will answer this third off topic reply.
In return, please take a stab at my OP instead of repeatedly attempting to derail my thread.
I don't want to point a gun at anyone, ever, as long as I live.
I may someday be FORCED to do so to defend myself, my loved ones or even a complete stranger like you from death or grievous injury.
And in my minds eye, even under those circumstances, I do not relish the thought of being responsible for the death of another human being, even if it was self defense or the protection of an innocent person.
That's still someones child, and I will be the instrument that inflicts that pain on their innocent family and friends.
I've given this scenario much deliberation...I carry a firearm...and before that I was a soldier during the Cold-War who could have been called upon to kill to defend my country.
FTR I will die a happy man if I am never ever put in a position that I am forced to use a firearm against another human being.
So why do oppose a ban on Semi-automatic rifles?
Because I understand the axiom "Power Corrupts".
As the government becomes more and more powerful and centralized, the more corrupt it becomes.
Do I think it is a certainty that our government will become oppressive?
Not at all.
But I do see the POSSIBILITY that it could, someday in the future.
And to forestall that possibility, the founders gave us an uninfringable amendment, one that keeps, if not an equal power, a power that is formidable, to keep that oppressive nature of government in check...and every attempt to chip away that right lessens it's effectiveness...maybe someday to the point that a future corrupt government believes it is a manageable power.
The left mocks your desire to protect.... US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum