CASE FALLS APART: Capitol Hill Investigators Ask for 60-Day Delay to Build a Case Against Jan. 6 Protesters After FBI-Media Conspiracies Crumble

[toobfreak]

Who saw that coming? Answer: everyone who isn't a brainwashed prog.
CASE FALLS APART: Capitol Hill Investigators Ask for 60-Day Delay to Build a Case Against Jan. 6 Protesters After FBI-Media Conspiracies Implode

I especially liked the part where they admitted that all these terrible "insurgents" and "traitors" that the Dem prosecution tried so hard in the impeachment to vilify are finally admitted to have been WAVED INTO (invited) into the Capitol.

If it's not the house of the people then it is home to no one.

 

[Chillicothe]

POTUS was permitted to save an American election!

........................................................................................................

Ummm, poster 2bfreak, I would suggest you do a little due diligence on how our electoral protocols function by state. And how they check their own votes......by precinct, by county, by state. Their reviews, audits, recounts, and certifications.

My point, there are many layers of vetting.
And any elected official is subject to the same vetting of votes....township drain commissioner, to President of the United States.
It is a formalized procedure. Time worn and tested.

Don Trump's votes.....and Joe Biden's too......were sifted, sorted, secured, counted, and signed-off on by many layers of responsible people.

American citizens who work our elections take that job very very seriously.
If you haven't worked a precinct on voting day then you may be unaware.

I suspect that is the case.

 

[Chillicothe]

admitted that all these terrible "insurgents" and "traitors" ........ are finally admitted to have been WAVED INTO (invited) into the Capitol.

Also, poster 2bfeak, I think you are engaging in a little wishful thinking to bolster your desired narrative.
If any police gave way....it likely was because they themselves were unarmored and way undermanned, in the face of a charging murderous mob of angry vandals. They gave way for their own safety.

That may have happened at a a select doorway or two (there a lot of entry doors).....but as we have all seen by now those insurrectionists and assaulters were NOT being "waved in" by the cops they were savaging with clubs, chemicals, and thrown objects.

Nor, were they being "waved into" those windows we've seen smashed open with stolen police equipment.

It seems, and correct me if wrong, but it seems poster 2bfreak wants so desperately for the insurrectionists to just be innocent and awed tourists that he's engaging in a bit of personal fabulism.

 

[Batcat]

• but she was a right winger, so I suppose the shooting was justified to you.

• Not fire randomly into a crowd comes to mind.

• So a protestor was climbing through a window.Was she armed? Apparently not. Was she an immediate and serious threat to the life or health of the police officer or anyone he was protesting?

  [/QUOTE

......................................................................................................................................

I saw the exchanges up in the thread between the poster Coyote and the avatarees I quote above.
First, lemme say.....poster Coyote doesn't need me to be his 6. He can handle the fringie-ness offered by some of our more prolific and misinformed posters, thank you very much.

OK, having said that: RIP Ashley Babbitt. And comfort to her family. Hers was a tragic death. A wrongful death. 'Wrongful', we are sad to say.....by her own agency. By her own actions. And her own misunderstandings of a political dynamic that misled her. But, the primary agency of her misunderstandings.....was, regrettably, her own.

However, poor mis-informed Ms Babbitt went where angels fear tread.
Where she was explicitly warned NOT to go.
And she went in a manner that threatened duly authorized officers of the law who were oath-required to protect the space she violently breached.

And, tragically, it cost her.

Now, we have posters here who are suggesting the officer should have known she carried only a phone...and not a weapon. Another hinting she was shot only because she was, in his words, a "right-winger'. Another suggests that she ONLY climbed into a window.....and thus her shooting was wrongful.

...............................................................

OK, let's do this drill once again.
It has been presented several times on this venue:

Ms. Babbitt was an integral part of a violent mob who had already broken into the Capitol of the United States. She and her cohorts came to yet another locked door....to the Speaker's Lobby, a fairly sacrosanct part of the Capitol complex.

Behind that door were armed officers who were charged in their official duties to protect that doorway, that Lobby, that Capitol. And Ms.Babbitt and her co-conspirators reached that door and they violently...violently...began actions to breach it. (all of this has been presented as video from both outside the door, and from inside the lobby).

As they began their battering of the door in their attempt to breach.....they were loudly and insistently warned to back off. They continued. And then a pistol in the hands of an officer was brandished. And the crowd was warned. The criminals on the other side of the door doing the battering acknowledged there was a gun present....and it was aimed in their direction. Yet, they continued battering.

A breach was effected. An opening was battered open. And into it quickly and aggressively Ms.Babbitt was thrust or jumped. Dressed in a concealing shroud that could have concealed C-4 explosives, a Glock17, or lipstick. The officers on the other side of the door fearing for their lives as the door was being battered down......had no way in this God's good green earth....what could be hidden in Ms.Babbitt's shrouded figure.

So, she and her group were expressly warned. But they continued. They advanced in an aggressive manner. In the face of an acknowledged firearm held by an officer of the law. And then Ms. Babbitt jumped into threatening proximity to those officers.

Tragically, it cost her.
By a well aimed, specifically aimed, bullet. Aimed at a threatening figure (male? female? who could tell?) who emerged into a space that was personally threatening to officers of the law.

Yes, indeed, it cost.

RIP, and may comfort come to her family[/quote]

Well perhaps we can look at it this way. We are lucky she was white as if she had been black BLM would still be protesting her death and would have burned Washington D.C. down.

Cops can shoot white people without a good reason to use lethal force and usually nothing happens.

Video of Shooting Death of Ashli Babbitt Raises Questions About Use of Deadly Force

Was it justified?

legalinsurrection.com

 

[Concerned American]

• but she was a right winger, so I suppose the shooting was justified to you.

• Not fire randomly into a crowd comes to mind.

• So a protestor was climbing through a window.Was she armed? Apparently not. Was she an immediate and serious threat to the life or health of the police officer or anyone he was protesting?

  [/QUOTE

......................................................................................................................................

I saw the exchanges up in the thread between the poster Coyote and the avatarees I quote above.
First, lemme say.....poster Coyote doesn't need me to be his 6. He can handle the fringie-ness offered by some of our more prolific and misinformed posters, thank you very much.

OK, having said that: RIP Ashley Babbitt. And comfort to her family. Hers was a tragic death. A wrongful death. 'Wrongful', we are sad to say.....by her own agency. By her own actions. And her own misunderstandings of a political dynamic that misled her. But, the primary agency of her misunderstandings.....was, regrettably, her own.

However, poor mis-informed Ms Babbitt went where angels fear tread.
Where she was explicitly warned NOT to go.
And she went in a manner that threatened duly authorized officers of the law who were oath-required to protect the space she violently breached.

And, tragically, it cost her.

Now, we have posters here who are suggesting the officer should have known she carried only a phone...and not a weapon. Another hinting she was shot only because she was, in his words, a "right-winger'. Another suggests that she ONLY climbed into a window.....and thus her shooting was wrongful.

...............................................................

OK, let's do this drill once again.
It has been presented several times on this venue:

Ms. Babbitt was an integral part of a violent mob who had already broken into the Capitol of the United States. She and her cohorts came to yet another locked door....to the Speaker's Lobby, a fairly sacrosanct part of the Capitol complex.

Behind that door were armed officers who were charged in their official duties to protect that doorway, that Lobby, that Capitol. And Ms.Babbitt and her co-conspirators reached that door and they violently...violently...began actions to breach it. (all of this has been presented as video from both outside the door, and from inside the lobby).

As they began their battering of the door in their attempt to breach.....they were loudly and insistently warned to back off. They continued. And then a pistol in the hands of an officer was brandished. And the crowd was warned. The criminals on the other side of the door doing the battering acknowledged there was a gun present....and it was aimed in their direction. Yet, they continued battering.

A breach was effected. An opening was battered open. And into it quickly and aggressively Ms.Babbitt was thrust or jumped. Dressed in a concealing shroud that could have concealed C-4 explosives, a Glock17, or lipstick. The officers on the other side of the door fearing for their lives as the door was being battered down......had no way in this God's good green earth....what could be hidden in Ms.Babbitt's shrouded figure.

So, she and her group were expressly warned. But they continued. They advanced in an aggressive manner. In the face of an acknowledged firearm held by an officer of the law. And then Ms. Babbitt jumped into threatening proximity to those officers.

Tragically, it cost her.
By a well aimed, specifically aimed, bullet. Aimed at a threatening figure (male? female? who could tell?) who emerged into a space that was personally threatening to officers of the law.

Yes, indeed, it cost.

RIP, and may comfort come to her family[/quote]

Well perhaps we can look at it this way. We are lucky she was white as if she had been black BLM would still be protesting her death and would have burned Washington D.C. down.

Cops can shoot white people without a good reason to use lethal force and usually nothing happens.

Video of Shooting Death of Ashli Babbitt Raises Questions About Use of Deadly Force

Was it justified?

legalinsurrection.com

Yeah, and democrats can open fire on republicans playing softball, wounding several and somehow that is hardly news, but a man with right wing ties parks in front of the VP's house and he is arrested for weapons violations. SMH.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

...The Feds dismissed the cases.

Ahhhhhhh.... so there WAS a Federal jurisdiction after all, eh? Mighty White of you to finally acknowledge that obvious fact.

Now... that was "The Feds" during the tenure of the RUMP Administration, wasn't it?

So... why didn't your Orange Baboon-God do a better job of it?

Biden dismissed the charges retard not trump

 

[Kondor3]

...The Feds dismissed the cases.

Ahhhhhhh.... so there WAS a Federal jurisdiction after all, eh? Mighty White of you to finally acknowledge that obvious fact.

Now... that was "The Feds" during the tenure of the RUMP Administration, wasn't it?

So... why didn't your Orange Baboon-God do a better job of it?

Biden dismissed the charges retard not trump

So why didn't your Orange Baboon-God fast-track the trials so that they concluded prior to the end of his term?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

...The Feds dismissed the cases.

Ahhhhhhh.... so there WAS a Federal jurisdiction after all, eh? Mighty White of you to finally acknowledge that obvious fact.

Now... that was "The Feds" during the tenure of the RUMP Administration, wasn't it?

So... why didn't your Orange Baboon-God do a better job of it?

Biden dismissed the charges retard not trump

So why didn't your Orange Baboon-God fast-track the trials so that they concluded prior to the end of his term?

President doesnt decide when cases are heard dumb ass

 

[lennypartiv]

Soon the truth will come out. Those responsible were from Antifa.

So you'd like there to be some type of of 9/11 style Commission to get to the bottom of this, right?

Exactly. The left wing should be exposed for their bad behavior.

 

[hadit]

So why didn't your Orange Baboon-God fast-track the trials so that they concluded prior to the end of his term?

Thank goodness we don't have any of those around. They sound scary. On a more relevant topic, could anyone not easily predict the screaming and wailing from the usual suspects had the president "fast tracked" the trials? They would screeching "cover-up" before the echoes died down.

 

[easyt65]

Americans who walked through Capitol doors being held open by Capitol Police and who simply walked around are being forced to endure Constitutional and Civil Rights-violating treatment that domestic Antifa & BLM terrorists who attempted to burn alive local and federal police and who murdered Americans while causing BILLIONS of dollars of damage to Democrat-run communities all over the US.

Even domestic terrorists arrested for attempting to murder police officers were allowed bail and were out of jail within 24hrs; meanwhile, there are 6 Jan members in jail who did far less and HAVE NOT BEEN CHARGED yet.


48 hours

Law enforcement can hold you for 48 hours before they must charge you.

How Long Can I Be Held in Custody by Law Enforcement? Arizona

In most cases, someone who is arrested will be taken into custody by law enforcement, processed into jail and then be formally charged. But..

dmcantor.com

 

[Coyote]

Americans who walked through Capitol doors being held open by Capitol Police and who simply walked around are being forced to endure ...

 

[Chillicothe]

"there are 6 Jan members in jail who did far less and HAVE NOT BEEN CHARGED yet."

Which ones?

Name names, poster easyt.

Batter up.
-----------------------------------------------------------

ps.... I love your description of "6 Jan members

"members"? That is gold! That is money!

I love this bar!

 

[Coyote]

Which ones?

Name names, poster easyt.

Batter up.
-----------------------------------------------------------

ps.... I love your description of "6 Jan members

"members"? That is gold! That is money!

I love this bar!

 

[Clipper]

If Democrats weren't doing so badly they wouldn't have to keep diverting everyone's attention with fabricated bullshit.

You're too use to having a crisis actor in Trump as president.

 

[MadChemist]

So... why didn't your Orange Baboon-God do just that while he was still in power?

Because he had not been sworn in yet.

Along with his ho VP.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Who saw that coming? Answer: everyone who isn't a brainwashed prog.

CASE FALLS APART: Capitol Hill Investigators Ask for 60-Day Delay to Build a Case Against Jan. 6 Protesters After FBI-Media Conspiracies Implode

The liberal fake new media oversold the January 6th protest and “riot” at the US Capitol was a terrorist attack, an armed insurgency, a pre-planned plot to take over the US Capitol.​

​

It was all a lie.​

​

** The protesters were not armed. ** There were NO GUNS confiscated from protesters in the US Capitol. ** The only shooting was by a Capitol Hill Police Lieutenant. ** There was NO PLOT to take over the US Capitol by Trump supporters. ** President Trump called for a peaceful protest. ** The Oath Keepers did not plan an armed insurgency. ** Total damages of possibly $100,000 to $1,000,000 dwarf the $2 BILLION in damages from the 2020 BLM-Antifa riots. ** Hundreds of protesters were waved into the US Capitol by police.​

​

Now federal prosecutors are in a bind. The case they promised is collapsing.​

​

On Friday prosecutors asked for 60 more days to invent a case against the protesters. They got nothing.​

Federal prosecutors submitted a filing Friday morning requesting a 60-day delay in a series of cases related to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, describing the massive undertaking as “likely the most complex investigation ever prosecuted by the Department of Justice.”

The big picture: More than 300 suspects have been charged in connection with the attack, which FBI Director Christopher Wray has described as “domestic terrorism.”

In addition to individual crimes like assault, trespassing and destruction of government property, federal prosecutors are investigating “conspiratorial activity” that began before Jan. 6. The Justice Department expects that at least 100 more individuals will be charged, according to the filing.

It's been more than half a year.

Per the Sixth Amendment's requirement for a speedy trial, if the prosecutors aren't ready to make their cases by now, then all charges need to be dropped.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.​

It's very specifically a point of the Sixth Amendment to not allow government to hold citizens indefinitely, on unproven charges.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

They need to prosecute all those people who have been burning down our cities. If they don't, the justice system is a sham.

So... why didn't your Orange Baboon-God do just that while he was still in power?

No baboon, orange or otherwise, has ever been in any position that would give it any authority or responsibility over such matters.

 

[surada]

Who saw that coming? Answer: everyone who isn't a brainwashed prog.

CASE FALLS APART: Capitol Hill Investigators Ask for 60-Day Delay to Build a Case Against Jan. 6 Protesters After FBI-Media Conspiracies Implode

The liberal fake new media oversold the January 6th protest and “riot” at the US Capitol was a terrorist attack, an armed insurgency, a pre-planned plot to take over the US Capitol.​

​

It was all a lie.​

​

** The protesters were not armed. ** There were NO GUNS confiscated from protesters in the US Capitol. ** The only shooting was by a Capitol Hill Police Lieutenant. ** There was NO PLOT to take over the US Capitol by Trump supporters. ** President Trump called for a peaceful protest. ** The Oath Keepers did not plan an armed insurgency. ** Total damages of possibly $100,000 to $1,000,000 dwarf the $2 BILLION in damages from the 2020 BLM-Antifa riots. ** Hundreds of protesters were waved into the US Capitol by police.​

​

Now federal prosecutors are in a bind. The case they promised is collapsing.​

​

On Friday prosecutors asked for 60 more days to invent a case against the protesters. They got nothing.​

Federal prosecutors submitted a filing Friday morning requesting a 60-day delay in a series of cases related to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, describing the massive undertaking as “likely the most complex investigation ever prosecuted by the Department of Justice.”

The big picture: More than 300 suspects have been charged in connection with the attack, which FBI Director Christopher Wray has described as “domestic terrorism.”

In addition to individual crimes like assault, trespassing and destruction of government property, federal prosecutors are investigating “conspiratorial activity” that began before Jan. 6. The Justice Department expects that at least 100 more individuals will be charged, according to the filing.

My God.. Don't you have your own tabloids in the UK? Why on earth would you read trash like Gateway Pundit?

 

[bripat9643]

My God.. Don't you have your own tabloids in the UK? Why on earth would you read trash like Gateway Pundit?

I'm an American, dumbass, and the GP is far better than any of those fake news tabloids.