Capitalism: The Holy Grail of Economics

[danielpalos]

Unfettered capitalism and the industrial revolution led to nightmarish working conditions and poverty for all.

of course that's liberal, very stupid, and backwards. People would have stayed on their farms if the jobs they took make them poorer. A child could have figured that out, just not a liberal.

how many safety regulations did capitalists come up with during the Twenties, other than new fangled ways to show off their wealth.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Unfettered capitalism and the industrial revolution led to nightmarish working conditions and poverty for all.

of course that's liberal, very stupid, and backwards. People would have stayed on their farms if the jobs they took make them poorer. A child could have figured that out, just not a liberal.

how many safety regulations did capitalists come up with during the Twenties, other than new fangled ways to show off their wealth.

always enough to stay ahead of the competition by offering the best safety in the world rather than lose their best workers to those who did offer the best safety.

Feel stupid yet??

 

[Indeependent]

Unfettered capitalism and the industrial revolution led to nightmarish working conditions and poverty for all.

of course that's liberal, very stupid, and backwards. People would have stayed on their farms if the jobs they took make them poorer. A child could have figured that out, just not a liberal.

how many safety regulations did capitalists come up with during the Twenties, other than new fangled ways to show off their wealth.

always enough to stay ahead of the competition by offering the best safety in the world rather than lose their best workers to those who did offer the best safety.

Feel stupid yet??

Hey, asswipe, I'm still waiting for that list of MNCs that started in the US.
Can't get it up?

 

[danielpalos]

6. "Brooks used the precipitous drop in poverty rates as a data point in his broader argument that work is one of the most important factors in generating happiness. And not just creative, fun work—any work, even Walmart jobs, he says. It doesn't matter if you make minimum wage or Brooks's own$645,000 salary—the important thing is experiencing "earned success," he explains, or "the belief that you're creating value with your life and that you're creating value in the lives of other people." Is America to Thank for the Global Decline in Poverty?





7. Let's look at the opposite doctrine....that of the fool/ideologue, Barack Obama: do away with the work requirement in the welfare bill:

"Obama kills welfare reform
Determined to destroy Bill Clinton’s signature achievement, President Obama’s administration has opened a loophole in the 1996 welfare reform legislation big enough to make the law ineffective. Its work requirement — the central feature of the legislation — has been diluted beyond recognition by the bureaucrats at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

On Thursday of last week, HHS issued regulations that modified — gutted — the work requirement. ... The regs say that “vocational educational training or jobsearch/readiness programs” “count as well” in meeting the basic condition that recipients work in order to receive welfare benefits." Obama kills welfare reform

dear, Only the right has lost its clue and its Cause, when it comes to a moral of "goodwill toward men". It is why the social left has to pick up that ethical slack.

 

[Indeependent]

6. "Brooks used the precipitous drop in poverty rates as a data point in his broader argument that work is one of the most important factors in generating happiness. And not just creative, fun work—any work, even Walmart jobs, he says. It doesn't matter if you make minimum wage or Brooks's own$645,000 salary—the important thing is experiencing "earned success," he explains, or "the belief that you're creating value with your life and that you're creating value in the lives of other people." Is America to Thank for the Global Decline in Poverty?





7. Let's look at the opposite doctrine....that of the fool/ideologue, Barack Obama: do away with the work requirement in the welfare bill:

"Obama kills welfare reform
Determined to destroy Bill Clinton’s signature achievement, President Obama’s administration has opened a loophole in the 1996 welfare reform legislation big enough to make the law ineffective. Its work requirement — the central feature of the legislation — has been diluted beyond recognition by the bureaucrats at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

On Thursday of last week, HHS issued regulations that modified — gutted — the work requirement. ... The regs say that “vocational educational training or jobsearch/readiness programs” “count as well” in meeting the basic condition that recipients work in order to receive welfare benefits." Obama kills welfare reform

dear, Only the right has lost its clue and its Cause, when it come to a moral of "goodwill toward men". It is why the social left has to pick up that ethical slack.

The Right never had it; they should at least be honest and admit such.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Unfettered capitalism and the industrial revolution led to nightmarish working conditions and poverty for all.

of course that's liberal, very stupid, and backwards. People would have stayed on their farms if the jobs they took make them poorer. A child could have figured that out, just not a liberal.

how many safety regulations did capitalists come up with during the Twenties, other than new fangled ways to show off their wealth.

always enough to stay ahead of the competition by offering the best safety in the world rather than lose their best workers to those who did offer the best safety.

Feel stupid yet??

Hey, asswipe, I'm still waiting for that list of MNCs that started in the US.
Can't get it up?

capitalists always came up with enough to stay ahead of the competition in offering the best in world on the job safety possible rather than lose their best workers to those who did offer the best possible safety. Now you understand the glory of Republican capitalism- right?

Feel stupid yet??

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

, Only the right has lost its clue and its Cause, when it comes to a moral of "goodwill toward men"..

dear the right is for capitalism which just eliminated 40% of the world's poverty in China?? How stupid are you??

 

[Indeependent]

Unfettered capitalism and the industrial revolution led to nightmarish working conditions and poverty for all.

of course that's liberal, very stupid, and backwards. People would have stayed on their farms if the jobs they took make them poorer. A child could have figured that out, just not a liberal.

how many safety regulations did capitalists come up with during the Twenties, other than new fangled ways to show off their wealth.

always enough to stay ahead of the competition by offering the best safety in the world rather than lose their best workers to those who did offer the best safety.

Feel stupid yet??

Hey, asswipe, I'm still waiting for that list of MNCs that started in the US.
Can't get it up?

capitalists always came up with enough to stay ahead of the competition in offering the best in world on the job safety possible rather than lose their best workers to those who did offer the best possible safety. Now you understand the glory of Republican capitalism- right?

Feel stupid yet??

Concrete examples, asswipe.
Still waiting for the top 10 MNC list that originated in the US.

 

[danielpalos]

, Only the right has lost its clue and its Cause, when it comes to a moral of "goodwill toward men"..

dear the right is for capitalism which just eliminated 40% of the world's poverty in China?? How stupid are you??

dear, you fail to understand that our form of socialism is the best in the world, and the right proves it by complaining about the least wealthy and their EBT card expenditures.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

dear, you fail to understand that our form of socialism is the best in the world,

if you're trying to say that our mixed economy is mixed with more capitalism than most others and thus is the best in the world you are correct. Do you have any idea what you are trying to say??

 

[danielpalos]

dear, you fail to understand that our form of socialism is the best in the world,

if you're trying to say that our mixed economy is mixed with more capitalism than most others and thus is the best in the world you are correct. Do you have any idea what you are trying to say??

dear, that in our mixed-market economy, socialism bails out capitalism as business as usual, everyday.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

dear, you fail to understand that our form of socialism is the best in the world,

if you're trying to say that our mixed economy is mixed with more capitalism than most others and thus is the best in the world you are correct. Do you have any idea what you are trying to say??

dear, that in our mixed-market economy, socialism bails out capitalism as business as usual, everyday.

and????????????

 

[danielpalos]

dear, you fail to understand that our form of socialism is the best in the world,

if you're trying to say that our mixed economy is mixed with more capitalism than most others and thus is the best in the world you are correct. Do you have any idea what you are trying to say??

dear, that in our mixed-market economy, socialism bails out capitalism as business as usual, everyday.

and????????????

why not cease and desist in the special pleading of the Right regarding one dictionary definition of a political-science term.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

dear, you fail to understand that our form of socialism is the best in the world,

if you're trying to say that our mixed economy is mixed with more capitalism than most others and thus is the best in the world you are correct. Do you have any idea what you are trying to say??

dear, that in our mixed-market economy, socialism bails out capitalism as business as usual, everyday.

and????????????

why not cease and desist in the special pleading of the Right regarding one dictionary definition of a political-science term.

dear, if socialism in your retarded mind somehow bailout capitalism so what? Do you then want to bring back Hitler Stalin or Mao or neither?? Do you have any idea where your retarded mind is taking you?

 

[Indeependent]

dear, you fail to understand that our form of socialism is the best in the world,

if you're trying to say that our mixed economy is mixed with more capitalism than most others and thus is the best in the world you are correct. Do you have any idea what you are trying to say??

dear, that in our mixed-market economy, socialism bails out capitalism as business as usual, everyday.

and????????????

why not cease and desist in the special pleading of the Right regarding one dictionary definition of a political-science term.

dear, if socialism in your retarded mind somehow bailout capitalism so what? Do you then want to bring back Hitler Stalin or Mao or neither?? Do you have any idea where your retarded mind is taking you?

Why does everything in your ever rotting brain have to skew to extremes?
Id Great Britain slaughtering their citizens?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Id Great Britain slaughtering their citizens?

Do you mean is GB slaughtering its citizens?

 

[danielpalos]

dear, you fail to understand that our form of socialism is the best in the world,

if you're trying to say that our mixed economy is mixed with more capitalism than most others and thus is the best in the world you are correct. Do you have any idea what you are trying to say??

dear, that in our mixed-market economy, socialism bails out capitalism as business as usual, everyday.

and????????????

why not cease and desist in the special pleading of the Right regarding one dictionary definition of a political-science term.

dear, if socialism in your retarded mind somehow bailout capitalism so what? Do you then want to bring back Hitler Stalin or Mao or neither?? Do you have any idea where your retarded mind is taking you?

dear; it is your false dichotomy and begging the question. any more diversions? socialism starts with a social Contract; ours is defined in our federal and State Constitutions.

 

[Indeependent]

Id Great Britain slaughtering their citizens?

Do you mean is GB slaughtering its citizens?

My bad.
Is GB slaughtering its citizens? Nope!

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Id Great Britain slaughtering their citizens?

Do you mean is GB slaughtering its citizens?

My bad.
Is GB slaughtering its citizens? Nope!

ok GB is not slaughtering its citizens. And??????????????????????????

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

socialism starts with a social Contract; ours is defined in our federal and State Constitutions.

dear stupid, and???????Do you have any idea what you're point is????????