Canadian Man Faces 2 Years in Prison for Passing Out Jesus Saves Pamphlets at Gay Pride Parade
A Christian bus driver in Toronto has been charged with a “hate crime” for distributing pamphlets saying homosexuality can lead to diseases and that Jesus can save gay people if they repent. Bill Whatcott “distributed anti-gay material which promoted hatred toward the gay community,” Toronto Police Service said in a statement, adding that he was arrested in Calgary and later returned to Toronto.
Well wonder how the leftards will handle it all when it blows back on themn.
Thank God hatespeech laws got shot down in America, or else we'd be facing the same SJW law nightmare!
I think it's time to do away with "hate crime" laws now. A crime is a crime, period. I say if it's violent enough, hang them within 2 weeks after the trial.
We've lost a lot of free speech remember Obama dreamed up his " HATE SPEECH" bs against gays etc.
10 reasons the U.S. is no longer the land of the free
Assassination of U.S. citizens
President Obama has claimed, as President George W. Bush did before him, the
right to order the killing of any citizen considered a terrorist or an abettor of terrorism. Last year, he approved the killing of
U.S. citizen Anwar al-Awlaqi and another citizen under this claimed inherent authority. Last month, administration officials affirmed that power, stating that the
president can order the assassination of any citizen whom he considers allied with terrorists. (Nations such as Nigeria, Iran and Syria have been routinely criticized for extrajudicial killings of enemies of the state.)
Indefinite detention
Under the law signed last month, terrorism suspects are to be held by the military; the president also has the authority to indefinitely detain citizens accused of terrorism. While the administration claims that this provision only codified existing law, experts widely
6 Major US Supreme Court Hate Speech Cases
=========================================================================
Defining Hate Speech
The
American Bar Association defines hate speech as "speech that offends, threatens, or insults groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, or other traits." While Supreme Court justices have acknowledged the offensive nature of such speech in recent cases like
Matal v. Tam (2017), they have been reluctant to impose broad restrictions on it.